Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ummm... | | Aren't you wanting three different insets for your three different types of | info. My quick (and fully working) hack does exactly what your | | describe-function-binding line-end -> "C-e" | | would do. I guess that you could use the one inset, but don't see | why. Why have three identical insets? And insets have no business poking around in the bindings list, that is the task of lyxfuncs. We can easily also have lyxfunc like "today" instead of using ert... "show-variable author" Why go for the specific implementation when a generic implementation will be just as easy _and_ be a lot more powerful. Lgb
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Amir Karger
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Angus Leeming
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Allan Rae
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Allan Rae
- Re: Key-binding documentati... John Weiss
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Angus Leeming
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Key-binding documentati... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma John Weiss
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemm... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Key-binding documentation d... mike . ressler
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Allan Rae
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Garst R. Reese
- Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma Amir Karger