Re: Key-binding documentation dilemma

[Angus Leeming]

Ummm...

Aren't you wanting three different insets for your three different types of 
info. My quick (and fully working) hack does exactly what your 

describe-function-binding line-end -> "C-e"

would do. I guess that you could use the one inset, but don't see why.

Angus



On Monday 04 December 2000 12:33, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Gentlemen,
> |
> | I've written the inset proposed by Jean-Marc. Currently, it's a little
> | cumbersome to use:
> |
> | Eg, type in the minibuffer:
> |
> | shortcut-insert line-end
>
> But this is not what we really want... we want an inset that shows the
> output of a lyx variable.
>
> the command to get the would f.ex. be:
>
> describe-variable default-language -> "norsk"
> describe-function-binding line-end -> "C-e"
> describe-binding C-x C-s           -> "buffer-save"
>
> What we want is a inset that encapsulates this.
>
>         Lgb