ied from an existing installation.
> After copying you just need to check the Path Preferences (Tools →
> Preferences... → Paths).
> This assumes that you have TeX installed and do not rely on the LyX
> installer to do this for you.
>
> Kind regards,
> Hugo
>
>
the Path Preferences (Tools →
Preferences... → Paths).
This assumes that you have TeX installed and do not rely on the LyX
installer to do this for you.
Kind regards,
Hugo
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
> I have a problem when installing LyX 2.06. (Windows 7)
> It always stops when compiling python script. (see attachment)
> I have tried to uninstall all including miktex, the install using the bundle
> installer, it also stops at the sam
Christian del Castillo wrote:
> Problem still is - I work in Korea, with a PC in English Win XP, but Lyx
> installed into Japanese version for me.
It's rather unlikely that LyX uses Japanese localization just like that. Do
you have set up Japanese for your OS in some way?
Usually, LyX uses the d
e I know.
Thank you.
=
'Christian' Carmelo del Castillo, Ph.D.
Aquatic Biotechnology Center,
Gyeongsang National University,
TEL: +82-55-751-6732 FAX: +82-55-762-6733
MOBILE: +82-01-5737-1521
e-mail: chia...@msn.com
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
> Maybe the source in SVN still contains basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe, but when I build the installers
> I always include the latest version.
But the problem is real and probably Vincent is right:
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg150268.html
Can you please have a look?
(I btw
Joost Verburg schreef:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
I don't understand. I ship already basic-miktex-2.7.3248.exe.
>
Joost's installer doesn't. It downloads "basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe"
from "http://www.ctan.org/get/systems/win32/miktex/setup/";.
Aha, this explains a lot
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
I don't understand. I ship already basic-miktex-2.7.3248.exe.
>
Joost's installer doesn't. It downloads "basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe"
from "http://www.ctan.org/get/systems/win32/miktex/setup/";.
Aha, this explains a lot. This is a one year old
Vincent van Ravesteijn schrieb:
I don't understand. I ship already basic-miktex-2.7.3248.exe.
>
Joost's installer doesn't. It downloads "basic-miktex.2.7.2960.exe" from
"http://www.ctan.org/get/systems/win32/miktex/setup/";.
Aha, this explains a lot. This is a one year old version that is no
On 29/10/2008 21:01, leuven edwin wrote:
added suggestions and simplified the general donation
OK, thanks, I will move the new page as there's no more comment.
Abdel.
added suggestions and simplified the general donation
edwin
abdel wrote:
> I am fine with the changes and simplifications except that I miss the
> paragraph that indicates how to suggest a project. But perhaps you're
> right that this should be decided on the feature poll page.
i removed that because it seemed incomplete: it only mentioned how to find
ide
On 29/10/2008 20:15, leuven edwin wrote:
abdel wrote:
http://www.lyx.org/Donate-Draft
I reorganized it a bit following Ed's advice.
i did some more edits. perhaps someone with an opinion can have a look?
I am fine with the changes and simplifications except that
abdel wrote:
>> http://www.lyx.org/Donate-Draft
>
> I reorganized it a bit following Ed's advice.
i did some more edits. perhaps someone with an opinion can have a look?
thanks, ed.
will have a look at it tonight...
ed.
From: Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 09:05
To: Christian Ridderström
Cc: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Donation page (Was: windows lyx installer)
On 28/10/2008 08:47
On 28/10/2008 08:47, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Would you care to make a suggestion of what it should look like? To
prepare the way for you, I created 'Draft'-version of the page where
you can make the suggestion, see:
http://www.lyx.org/
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Would you care to make a suggestion of what it should look like? To
prepare the way for you, I created 'Draft'-version of the page where
you can make the suggestion, see:
http://www.lyx.org/Donate-Draft
I reorganized it a bit following Ed'
On 27/10/2008 19:01, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, leuven edwin wrote:
perhaps we should think about adding a checked checkbox "Tell me how
to donate!" linking to http://www.lyx.org/Donate at the end of the
windows installer.
another suggestion is to move the projects tab
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, leuven edwin wrote:
perhaps we should think about adding a checked checkbox "Tell me how to
donate!" linking to http://www.lyx.org/Donate at the end of the windows
installer.
another suggestion is to move the projects table to the top of the
webpage and add a first row w
perhaps we should think about adding a checked checkbox "Tell me how to
donate!" linking to http://www.lyx.org/Donate at the end of the windows
installer.
another suggestion is to move the projects table to the top of the webpage and
add a first row with a "General Donation". there is too much
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What do you mean. When you set the option to install LyX for all users,
a global file association for .lyx is set. When a user logs in, why
should he change this? But anyway, when he wants to do this, he can do
this via the folder options of the Windows file explorer as for all
> Your installer does not always take user specific settings into account (file
associations etc.).
What do you mean. When you set the option to install LyX for all users, a global file association
for .lyx is set. When a user logs in, why should he change this? But anyway, when he wants to do
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
That's what I meant, not all programs work when you don't install them
with admin priviledges. The Ghostscript developers will also not change
this.
I btw. could convince them today to provide Windows binaries for the
version 8.62 they released 2 months ago as this fixes some b
> A bundled subset of Python is installed, you don't need to have Python
installed.
>
>>What about Ghostscript?
>
> Ghostscript currently requires administrator privileges to install.
That's what I meant, not all programs work when you don't install them with admin priviledges. The
Ghostscr
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I tested out yesterday to install LyX as user-only using your latest
installer. The installation works, but the system I get is not complete
and not very useful - regarding image preview. I ve a full Python
installation, but what if I don't have, does it work to install Python
>>We have these restrictions here too and the admins absolutely don't like
that users install
>> things. Even when it is possible with user permissions, some things will
automatically be undone
>> when relogin. I discussed this with our admins a few times and they
convinced me not to offer
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What is btw. pplatex for?
The DVI post-processing for change tracking.
Joost
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
But haven't you done so the time Christian tried to bring us working
together? I had this time rewritten major parts of my code as suggested
by Christian. The plan was that these parts will be taken and other
parts of your installer to create a new one which code we both
under
>>Please, only install additional software if it is not already installed.
>
> I think the most important reason why Uwe wants to bundle this software is
because the already
> installed version may be outdated.
This is one reason (especially for ImageMagick), the other one the download size
y of working. You've worked on the
installers of
> external components and I've been working on all the tools directly linked to
LyX. Both have
> helped to improve the quality of LyX on Windows.
Indeed.
>>And he doesn't need to collaborate with me? I don't un
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Joost Verburg wrote:
I think you misunderstood me.
I think the word 'misunderstanding' probably plays a huge part in the
"dramas" we see on mailing lists... Perhaps it played a central part in
the recent drama about embedding although I can't say as I didn't follow
it.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Are you aware that is has been a huge amount of work to create proper
Windows ports of Aspell, the Aspell dictionaries, gettext, iconv,
pplatex etc. and to make this all MSVC compatible? You have included all
these things in your installer. That's of course fine with me
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:51:04PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Are you aware that is has been a huge amount of work to create proper
> Windows ports of Aspell, the Aspell dictionaries, gettext, iconv,
> pplatex etc. and to make this all MSVC compatible? You have included all
> these things in
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Uwe, this is just my 2 cents, if you still don't want to merge your
effort with Joost's just say "no", no need for another drama after the
embedding stuff :-)
I'm also not interested in long discussion without results. I just want
to say that I don't have strong opini
ectly linked to LyX. Both have helped to improve the
quality of LyX on Windows.
And he doesn't need to collaborate with me? I don't understand why
someone who joined the LyX installer business much later, don't need to
collaborate with me, but did always what he want without
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
My installer had this time some Windows specific settings, so that LyX
under Windows looked a bit different than the Linux version, that not
all developers liked, but these changes were requested by users.
This was the reason why your installer was not accepted as the official
> if this is true how did it happen, that your installer is an alternative one?
Angus started a Windows installer, I joined him and sent a lot of patches. Angus later retired and I
took over and created my installer. About a year later Joost appeared on the devel-list, and
announced his install
t's all.
> Time has passed and I reckon there are more and more Windows users;
so you'd do us all a great
> favor if you'd try to collaborate with Joost.
And he doesn't need to collaborate with me?
I had the impression that's what he tried to do with his mes
omeone
> who joined the LyX installer business much later, don't need to collaborate
> with me, but did always what he want without contacting me before. This is
> no basis for a collaboration, I gave up that a collaboration is possible.
that i understand, its harder to get some
ven't
used code by Joost until now, btw.)
> Time has passed and I reckon there are more and more Windows users; so you'd
do us all a great
> favor if you'd try to collaborate with Joost.
And he doesn't need to collaborate with me? I don't understand why someone wh
On Friday 18 April 2008 09:30:07 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Uwe, this is just my 2 cents, if you still don't want to merge your
> effort with Joost's just say "no", no need for another drama after the
> embedding stuff :-)
I always thought that Fridays are perfect for dramas. :-)
> Abdel.
--
Joost Verburg wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem is that you always did your own thing with the installer.
I have never had a chance to contribute or discuss with you before you
do a change.
I always ask the developers for comments when I add new features (other
than NSIS code optimization
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem is that you always did your own thing with the installer. I
have never had a chance to contribute or discuss with you before you do
a change.
I always ask the developers for comments when I add new features (other
than NSIS code optimization and things like that).
Joost Verburg schrieb:
I've recently rewritten large parts of the official installer in trunk.
Everything should now be much easier to understand (no more stack usage
for functions, more comments and meaningful variable names) and has also
been updated to use the latest NSIS technologies (Mod
Tim schrieb:
That link gives me a warning that the certificate is
bad and the site should not be trusted.
You can ignore this, or simpliy use my link and replace "https" by "http".
regards Uwe
Hi Uwe,
That link gives me a warning that the certificate is
bad and the site should not be trusted.
Pavel Sanda gave me this link which works fine:
ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/publishing/tex/lyx/bin/1.5.2
So I've used it.
Thanks for working on Lyx. It is superb and works
great.
Tim
--- Uwe Stöhr
Hi Pavel,
That link works great. Thank you.
You should put a note on
http://www.lyx.org/download/
to say the server is down. Otherwise you risk
having newbies give up too quickly and
searching for some other alternative tool.
Lyx is great. It is incredibly useful. Thanks for
working on it!
ftp.lyx.org is down.
Here's an alternative download repository:
https://developer.berlios.de/projects/lyxwininstall/
regards Uwe
> I tried ftp to ftp.lyx.org with no success.
>
> Is the server down?
yes, it seems to be down.
you can try mirrors
(eg ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/publishing/tex/lyx/bin/1.5.2 )
pavel
Hi,
I've tried to download LyX-1.5.2-1-Installer.exe
several times from several different computers from
this page:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/Windows
with no success.
I turned off my firewall and virus checker but it did
not help.
I tried ftp to ftp.lyx.org with no success.
Is the server down
Hi All,
thanks for the nice software.
I'd like to mention that there are some problems during Lyx installation if
there is a proxy needed to download the aspell dictionaries.
A solution might be to take the proxy setting from Miktex or to specify a
separate window were the proxy can be specifi
Joost Verburg schrieb:
I'm not using the Aspell 0.60.x releases because of their broken
Windows support. Currently in use is a Windows port of a recent Aspell
CVS version. I'll prepare a new pre-compiled Qt4 when there is
agreement about the installers.
0.60.5 was released after you grabbed you
I'm not using the Aspell 0.60.x releases because of their broken Windows
support. Currently in use is a Windows port of a recent Aspell CVS
version. I'll prepare a new pre-compiled Qt4 when there is agreement
about the installers.
Joost
Joost Verburg schrieb:
Edwin Leuven wrote:
lyx is nearing it's first beta for the 1.5 release and we could use
some help with the installer. we were hoping you could free some time
for this.
BTW: Do you have any plans to update lyx-windows-deps-msvc-qt4.zip?
There are new versions of both qt
Bo Peng wrote:
If everyone including Uwe thinks this is a good idea we can have a
single official installer very soon.
I am not sure about others...
i think we all agree that only one official installer is needed, and
personally i think joost's one is the obvious choice here.
furthermore,
Bo Peng wrote:
If everyone including Uwe thinks this is a good idea we can have a
single official installer very soon.
I am not sure about others...
AFAIK Uwe explicitly said that he was waiting for Joost to reappear in
order to work with him. Now that you are here and motivated again Joost,
I prefer to use provide an official and
unmodified LyX version and believe that changes should be discussed on
the list and implemented on all platforms.
These are the current consensus regarding windows installer and is
exactly the reason your installer is the official one.
Although it would
Edwin Leuven wrote:
lyx is nearing it's first beta for the 1.5 release and we could use some
help with the installer. we were hoping you could free some time for this.
It took me a lot of time to write an installer that complies with all
the requirements of the LyX users and developers, based
dear joost,
lyx is nearing it's first beta for the 1.5 release and we could use some
help with the installer. we were hoping you could free some time for this.
thanks!
regards, edwin
PS sorry if this request reaches you more than once, but some mails to
your sf account have been bouncing:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I've seen you on the NSIS-lists and know that you'll build us a perfect
installer. I now understand what you want to achieve. A thing that is
missing in my installer is indeed a method to update only LyX or only a
third party program when there's a problem with it.
Exactly wh
Joost Verburg wrote:
Because I already wrote lots of NSIS-based Windows installers, it is
possible for me to provide you all with hack-free scripts that make
everything a lot easier. If we now decide to go on with this integrated
solution, we can really take LyX/Win to the next level.
I've s
Hello Uwe,
Just my two cents on that issue:
Your installer helped me convinced some people to use LyX so I think
that everybody agrees that it is very good. I can only suggest that you
wait until Joost publish his new installer; maybe he have very good
reasons to rewrite it instead of patchin
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I'm advertising my installer solution here not only because of the
installer itself, it costs more time to get the installer working with
the third party programs. The actual MiKTeX version was build for my
installer and some new features are in now to be able to configure
MiK
Bo Peng wrote:
The problems are with licenses, and size of installers, and admin right.
The only complaint I received was the admin right problem. I asked
several times about the licence issues and they are correct now - means
there is no license issue at the moment. And about the size, my s
Hello LyXers,
under
http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id=9016
you find a new LyX installer for Windows version 1.1 that still comes with
LyX 1.3.7 but with many changes behind the scenes and some bug fixes.
To learn more about the LyX installer
Michael Gerz wrote:
Angus,
if you intend to build another LyX 1.3.7 installer, could you please
update the qtwin library at the same time? Christian has committed a
patch today that looks interesting. Among others, it may address the
flickering problems seen on Windows.
If you visit http://w
Am Mittwoch, 18. Januar 2006 23:08 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Michael Gerz wrote:
>
> > Angus,
> >
> > if you intend to build another LyX 1.3.7 installer, could you please
> > update the qtwin library at the same time? Christian has committed a
>
> Eh... I think you got
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Angus,
>
> if you intend to build another LyX 1.3.7 installer, could you please
> update the qtwin library at the same time? Christian has committed a
Eh... I think you got the wrong name there, unless there's another
Christian on this list.
/Christ
Angus,
if you intend to build another LyX 1.3.7 installer, could you please
update the qtwin library at the same time? Christian has committed a
patch today that looks interesting. Among others, it may address the
flickering problems seen on Windows.
I will check the recent qtwin patch with
69 matches
Mail list logo
