>> Yes, when I add
>> \usepackage{geometry}
>> to the preamble, the DVI output is also correct.
>
> not here (class article, texlive 2008, xdvi). what example file do you
> use for the experiments?
The one I attached in the bugreport. It works for me with all document
classes.
>> I have only f
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > i can confirm this problem with pdf, but geometry does not seem to help
> with
> > dvi here. have you actually tried it with dvi?
>
> Yes, when I add
> \usepackage{geometry}
> to the preamble, the DVI output is also correct.
not here (class article, texlive 2008, xdvi). what
>> This would of course be a fileformat change.
>
> the changes in format files are missing then.
I will of course also commit these things when I commit.
>> (I haven't added the Japanese paper sizes because these were recently added
>> to the geometry package ans thus not yet available on all L
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>This would of course be a fileformat change.
the changes in format files are missing then.
> (I haven't added the Japanese paper sizes because these were recently added
> to the geometry package ans thus not yet available on all LaTeX
> distributions by default.)
maybe we cou
The attached patch adds support for all paper sizes supported by the LaTeX-package geometry. This
would of course be a fileformat change. OK to go in?
(I haven't added the Japanese paper sizes because these were recently added to the geometry package
ans thus not yet available on all LaTeX distri
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > Current 1.4cvs
> > In Custom margins, you cannot enter anything in bottom margin. The
> > cursor moves, but the entry does not display.
>
> I cannot reproduce neither with xforms nor with qt frontend. All works as
> expected.
>
> Juergen.
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Current 1.4cvs
> In Custom margins, you cannot enter anything in bottom margin. The
> cursor moves, but the entry does not display.
I cannot reproduce neither with xforms nor with qt frontend. All works as
expected.
Juergen.
Current 1.4cvs
In Custom margins, you cannot enter anything in bottom margin. The
cursor moves, but the entry does not display.
It would be very convenient if, when a paper size is selected and Custom
sizes is selected, the current (default) sizes were displayed.
Thanks,
Garst
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 02:31:49PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My default paper is US letter, but this is not picked up by
> layout-document-paper, which tries to use cm unless I explicitly
> specify letter again.
yep. bug #146
thanks
john
--
"We're standing th
On Thursday 04 October 2001 09:53, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Jürgen, it would be better GUI-design to input integers only in the
> > width input and to use a choice for the units. That way we have valid
> > input always; no need for any feedback or checks at all. The e
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jürgen, it would be better GUI-design to input integers only in the
> width input and to use a choice for the units. That way we have valid
> input always; no need for any feedback or checks at all. The example
> to follow is in FormGraphics.C if you want to take up the chal
> P.S. Angus, the buttoncontroller for the latex log dialog complains about
> missing transitions in the OkCancelPolicy. This dialog should be
> using the IgnorantPolicy since Update is not equivalent to an OK
> (policy wise).
> In fact the state machine for the latex log dial
On Thursday 04 October 2001 09:01, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Allan Rae wrote:
> > The new design is better than what I had thought of and the logic
> > seems spot-on. I've tested all sorts of combinations of stuff and it
> > produces the right results. Very nice indeed.
>
> Thanks :-)
>
>
Allan Rae wrote:
> The new design is better than what I had thought of and the logic
> seems spot-on. I've tested all sorts of combinations of stuff and it
> produces the right results. Very nice indeed.
Thanks :-)
> All that is missing are some feedback messages to tell me to include
> units
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> OK, here is the result of my work on the paper tab.
> I have tried to combine the wishes of Allan, Jug and me and make it
> impossible to enter any senseless data AFAICS. Moreover, the tab looks
> a little bit more logical now IMHO.
> I hope this
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 16:18, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> OK, here is the result of my work on the paper tab.
> I have tried to combine the wishes of Allan, Jug and me and make it
> impossible to enter any senseless data AFAICS. Moreover, the tab looks
> a little bit more logical now IMH
OK, here is the result of my work on the paper tab.
I have tried to combine the wishes of Allan, Jug and me and make it
impossible to enter any senseless data AFAICS. Moreover, the tab looks
a little bit more logical now IMHO.
I hope this ends the discussion on the geometry button, which has
c
On 03-Oct-2001 Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Hmm... I would like to keep the "custom paper" entry in the papersize
> choice, because that's how it's like in bad wordprocessors. But if you
> really have such strong feelings against the geometry button, I'll just
> rename it. A less cryptic nam
get back to a4 settings wouldn't
> you or do you propose to clear all custom settings as soon as a user
> changes the settings of either Special or Papersize?
>
> Big surprise for some users I would image who might have hoped they
> could just switch to a standard papersize for
ser convenience so they could get back to a4 settings wouldn't you or do
you propose to clear all custom settings as soon as a user changes the
settings of either Special or Papersize?
Big surprise for some users I would image who might have hoped they could
just switch to a standard papersize
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> In case, it has not been re-mentionned already in this thread: what
> about making the margin fields inactive when 'use geometry' is off.
> It is much more intuitive IMO.
Already done in my tree (among other things). But the button still
disturbs (me).
Jürgen
> JM
Am Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2001 17:15 schrieb Juergen Vigna:
> You're very patient #:O)
I know ;-)
> Well if you find a way to have "Geometry margins" in the "Special"
> drop down box which also honors the "Papersize" drop down box then go
> for it. Right now if you select something in the "Special
On 02-Oct-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> In case, it has not been re-mentionned already in this thread: what
> about making the margin fields inactive when 'use geometry' is off. It
> is much more intuitive IMO.
That would be the easiest solution and each "User" immediately sees what
for th
On 02-Oct-2001 Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> OK. Last try: Would it satisfy your needs if I would delete the button
You're very patient #:O)
> and add a way to chose the default margins of geometry (all the other
> features of that package can be chosen without the button currently)?
> If y
Am Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2001 11:01 schrieb Juergen Vigna:
> > Yes, I read that thread. I didn't really see a consensus there and
> > since it is still a topic on Michael's list I think it should be
> > discussed again.
>
> I don't. I just want a GUI way of selection deselecting that package
> (and
On 02-Oct-2001 Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>> Yes, I read that thread. I didn't really see a consensus there and
>> since it is still a topic on Michael's list I think it should be
>> discussed again.
>
> I don't. I just want a GUI way of selection deselecting that package
> (and maybe others too)
> Yes, I read that thread. I didn't really see a consensus there and
> since it is still a topic on Michael's list I think it should be
> discussed again.
I don't. I just want a GUI way of selection deselecting that package
(and maybe others too)
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
Am Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2001 09:32 schrieb Juergen Vigna:
> On 01-Oct-2001 Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> >> Let's get rid of this geometry button!
> >
> > Agreed! But have we decided when LyX should chose geometry
> > automatically? I am not very familiar with the geometry package, so
> > I need s
On 01-Oct-2001 Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> Let's get rid of this geometry button!
>
> Agreed! But have we decided when LyX should chose geometry
> automatically? I am not very familiar with the geometry package, so I
> need some hints.
We already discussed this and this button has to be t
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Got it.
Phew...
> Why not group the form like so. (ok, it ain't pretty, but that'll
> come eventually).
so == StarOffice?? Are you serious ;-)? Well I'll have a look how it
could be rearranged a little bit better.
> Note also Special should be active only if the paper i
On Monday 01 October 2001 16:03, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Ahhh. But you would never be able to turn it off!
>
> OK ;-)
>
> > > > You might rearrange the dialog so that Special goes in the
> > > > Margins box perhaps. On second thoughts, perhaps not, but I'm
> > > >
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ahhh. But you would never be able to turn it off!
OK ;-)
> > > You might rearrange the dialog so that Special goes in the
> > > Margins box perhaps. On second thoughts, perhaps not, but I'm
> > > sure that it could be arranged more coherently.
> >
> > I'm not shure either.
On Monday 01 October 2001 15:25, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Thanks. Strange enough: it worked for me, but you are the expert and
> the attached patch (FormDocument2.diff) is corrected ;-)
Ahhh. But you would never be able to turn it off!
> > You might rearrange the dialog so that Special goe
On Monday 01 October 2001 12:21, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it intended to add some more options here eventually?
Don't think so.
> If not, you might apply the attached patch. It disables the "Special"
> choice if landscape is chosen and resets it to "None".
Good idea.
> This is
Hi,
Is it intended to add some more options here eventually?
If not, you might apply the attached patch. It disables the "Special"
choice if landscape is chosen and resets it to "None".
This is one more step towards the new "Don't Allow Senseless Values
(TM)" approach in the 1.2.0 Dialogs ;-)
35 matches
Mail list logo
