On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 05:06:16PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> We don't even use branches right now, so what real point is there in
> subversion?
...
However, I'd agree that there are more important things to fix right
now.
Andre'
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 05:06:16PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:36:30PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > My understanding is that you would use an additional bunch of scripts
> > called 'submaster' to do that. I am not sure though, and it might even
> > be possible to use
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:36:30PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> My understanding is that you would use an additional bunch of scripts
> called 'submaster' to do that. I am not sure though, and it might even
> be possible to use 'submaster' together with real CVS.
I see, I hadn't realised there w
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:47:53AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > I've recently seen a presentation on the subversion/submaster combo and
> > I was pretty impressed, especially with it's 'offline capabilities'.
>
> Um, are you sure
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Yep, a tiny little utility library, but you have to install the
John> whole bleeding thing. But that's only one bit. I do not think
John> it's worth the upheaval for the very small additional benefits
John> you get.
I see.
John> I'd ra
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 11:01:11AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I agree, we should not create a barrier preventing entry of new
> developers... and also avoid annoying existing ones :)
>
> Concerning the requirements of the client, they seem to be:
>
> - APR from apache 2.0
>
> If I u
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Of course, this makes it as useless in my eyes as CVS, but I'm
John> probably bigoted on this issue. It might work for such a tiny
John> group as the lyx developers, though I don't relish trying to
John> meet its requirements (and I have
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I've recently seen a presentation on the subversion/submaster combo and
> I was pretty impressed, especially with it's 'offline capabilities'.
Um, are you sure? AFAIUI subversion has no real support for distributed
development, as
Angus Leeming wrote:
Thanks, Ling. I have a patch, which I'll post once cvs responds
again...
Ok, nothing wrong with cvs. It just took it ages to ascertain all the
changes to the po files that were caused by the invocation of
msgmerge by 'make distdir'.
Attached is the gtk patch, as promised. Pleas
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> I was pretty impressed, especially with it's 'offline capabilities'.
s/it's/its/
[In theory, I know the rules...]
Andre'
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:29:08PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:39:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
> > I have "look at subversion and try it out" on my agenda.
>
> Please no. You have to install a load of Apache crap (even if you don't
> need to use webdav)
Hm..
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 13:29, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:39:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> > I have "look at subversion and try it out" on my agenda.
>
> Please no. You have to install a load of Apache crap (even if you
> don't need to use webdav)
Come on, with
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:39:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I have "look at subversion and try it out" on my agenda.
Please no. You have to install a load of Apache crap (even if you don't
need to use webdav)
john
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:59:09PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>> >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > Lars> So that is my suggestion anyway, move the documentation files
>> > Lars> i
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:59:09PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Lars> So that is my suggestion anyway, move the documentation files
> > Lars> into lyx-devel, modify the rpm.spec so that document
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | So this will mean a bit more work for me, but it seems to be
Lars> the most | reasonable approach nevertheless.
Lars> Now I am confused. What do you want?
Go ahead, merge the repositories. The only risk is that I forget to
u
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Currently we have a BRANCH_1_3_X in lyxdoc. Actually, this is a reason
| to kepp lyxdoc as it is: when there is a new version, the lyxdoc
| repository is usually not branched until the need arises to document
| 1.4.0cvs features separately. For ex
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> So that is my suggestion anyway, move the documentation files
| Lars> into lyx-devel, modify the rpm.spec so that documentation is in
| Lars> its own rpm. (or at least the tr
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Or was your mention of 'cp' just the crude cp *.lyx
>> lyx-devel/lib/doc/ ; cvs add lyx-devel/lib/doc/*.lyx version?
Georg> I would prefer this one.
OK.
Georg> Does the documentation split mean that there are now two
Georg> documentatio
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> So that is my suggestion anyway, move the documentation files
> Lars> into lyx-devel, modify the rpm.spec so that documentation is in
> Lars> its own rpm. (or at least the translated docs)
>
>
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> So that is my suggestion anyway, move the documentation files
Lars> into lyx-devel, modify the rpm.spec so that documentation is in
Lars> its own rpm. (or at least the translated docs)
Can you do that on the cvs repository itse
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I do not think that shipping docs separately makes sense, since they
| are a needed part of LyX distribution. What we could do is separate
| some language packages, but this would mean a lot of different
| packages.
And it is easy enough to use t
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Sure it is called: cp.
I did not know it was so easy... We'll have to be careful about
LaTeXConfig.lyx.in, I guess.
Lars> But then we are back to the original problem: why we split them.
Lars> (size and such, otoh if we decid
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
| Lars> You need to run this from a shell where CVSROOT is declared
| Lars> correctly, | so that the documentation can be e
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> You need to run this from a shell where CVSROOT is declared
Lars> correctly, | so that the documentation can be extracted from its
Lars> repository.
Lars> I'd like to hav
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| You need to run this from a shell where CVSROOT is declared correctly,
| so that the documentation can be extracted from its repository.
I'd like to have the docs be in its own distribution, to avoid hacks
like that.
| Angus> 2. There are still
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Attached is the gtk patch, as promised. Please confirm it
> works for you.
>
> Angus> Jean-Marc, does this look OK to you?
>
> Yes, but I have a question: why do we have all these xpm files in
> src/frontends/gimages? Aren't they something that the other
> fro
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> 1. The make process seems to hang here: [ -f
> doc/UserGuide.lyx ] || { cvs -Q export -r HEAD -d doc lyxdoc
> || \ echo "WARNING: Unable to get LyX Documentation from
> CVS!" ; true ; }
>
> You need to run this from a shell where CVSROOT is declared
> correctly
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ling Li wrote:
>> Compiled OK. Just one small problem:
>> src/frontends/gtk/gimages/*.xpm are not included in the
>> distribution tar ball (make dist-bzip2).
>
> Thanks, Ling. I have a patch, which I'll post once cvs responds
> again...
Ok, nothing wrong with cvs. It just t
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Ling Li wrote:
>> Compiled OK. Just one small problem:
>> src/frontends/gtk/gimages/*.xpm are not included in the
>> distribution tar ball (make dist-bzip2).
Angus> Thanks, Ling. I have a patch, which I'll post once cvs responds
An
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Attached is the gtk patch, as promised. Please confirm it works
Angus> for you.
Angus> Jean-Marc, does this look OK to you?
Yes, but I have a question: why do we have all these xpm files in
src/frontends/gimages? Aren't they somet
Ling Li wrote:
> Compiled OK. Just one small problem: src/frontends/gtk/gimages/*.xpm
> are not included in the distribution tar ball (make dist-bzip2).
Thanks, Ling. I have a patch, which I'll post once cvs responds
again...
Jean-Marc, I note two things when I 'make distdir' from a
builddir !=
Compiled OK. Just one small problem: src/frontends/gtk/gimages/*.xpm are
not included in the distribution tar ball (make dist-bzip2).
--Ling
33 matches
Mail list logo
