On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 05:06:16PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:36:30PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > My understanding is that you would use an additional bunch of scripts > > called 'submaster' to do that. I am not sure though, and it might even > > be possible to use 'submaster' together with real CVS. > > I see, I hadn't realised there was additional bumf on top for this. > > I still think the cost-benefit ratio says we shouldn't do anything. > We'd be exchanging minor inconveniences for a significant barrier to new > developers. > > We don't even use branches right now, so what real point is there in > subversion?
Renaming files without losing the change history comes to mind. And yes, I dispise lyxtext.h + text.C + text2.C + text3.C. Andre'
