geLog
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/config/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.86.2.40
diff -u -p -r1.86.2.40 ChangeLog
--- config/ChangeLog18 Feb 2005 17:25:09 - 1.86.2.40
+++ config/ChangeLog22 Feb 2005 05:47:52 -
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2005-02-22
Try this patch instead if you really want to stick to obsoleted rule
types. How nobody else has had a problem is a mystery.
Allan. (ARRae)
Index: Makefile.am
===
RCS file:
/usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/frontends/xforms/forms
Angus wrote:
> This is a gnu make-ism, isn't it? At the moment the XForms frontend
> builds with non-gnu makes. I don't think that we should change that.
Automake generates plenty of entries with the "%.a: %.b" format.
Take a look at your Makefiles. They appear to be libtool related
mostly but t
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jean-Marc> Thanks for the tip. I'd rather use #include
> Jean-Marc> "support/snprintf.h" since this uses our own implementation
> Jean-Marc> if needed. Can you confirm that i
The recent backported bug fix for bug 1523 breaks compilation because
snprintf() is unknown. Note this is lyx-1.3.x cvs I'm talking about.
I haven't checked 1.4.x because it won't compile on this machine at
all.
Index: lyxlength.C
I'm trying to compile lyx-1.3.x cvs and found I need the following
change in order to avoid errors from make-3.79.1 which say it doesn't
know how to make .C files.
BTW, I'm not subscribed so please CC me as I don't get much time to
check the archive. Oh and I've looked at 1.4.0cvs and am very
imp
I took a look at the lovely new web design at:
http://devedge.netscape.com/
It all works well so long as you have javascript enabled -- turn off
javascript and you have the same problems you're reporting about my
mods.
That said, the javascript they are using is a modified form of one
a
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:17:27PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > How many other pages do you visit that let you change the website
> > design?
>
> Several. Admittedly they usually require login :)
Are they actually using a cookie
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 05:38:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > What is your setting for:
> >
> > Edit->Preferences->advanced->cache->Compare the page in the
> > cache to the page on the network
>
> Wh
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> I don't have another page I've seen that has this problem
How many other pages do you visit that let you change the website
design?
Do they have cache-control directives in the header?
Like:
(which doesn't mean you can't cache the page BTW)
I've
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> > Can you send me a cutdown screenshot please.
>
> http://movementarian.org/pinmenu.png
This should be fixed now.
Allan. (ARRae)
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
[...]
> I don't have another page I've seen that has this problem
Must be our rewriting of a single line that does it.
What is your setting for:
Edit->Preferences->advanced->cache->Compare the page in the
cache to the page on the network
I have "eve
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> But the thing *does* cycle !!
And _your_ problem is?
(...recorded in the mail archives somewhere)
Allan. (ARRae) Cycling environment depth ROCKS!
The three-column and the two-column styles use different
padding/margin methods to achieve the same thing. Does one work and
not the other?
In either case they work in Mozilla-1.1 and as far as I can see if
Mozilla-HEAD gets this bit wrong it's a new bug in Mozilla.
I have noticed that sometime
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:41:48PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Most Westernised folks at least will be familiar with the "recycle"
> > triangle. It's a small jump to make a similar association here.
>
> But we can
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:36:33PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I also changed the default to simple-blue and removed the non-existant
> > options from site_preferences.php3.
>
> Yay. The pinmenu extends out of the left of the backgr
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 03:40:47PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > redraw the arrow as a cycle?
> >
> > /->-\
> > | |
> > \-<-/
> >
> > (hopefully a little prettier than this nightmare)
>
> Step
I've made a few small changes to the CSS on my site so that the italic
headings are gone and run all combos through the CSS validator -- I
get colour warnings (color and no background/background-color set and
such) that I'll tweak away sometime.
I have only validated the XHTML of a few pages (mai
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> You guessed it. Mozilla is too bloated for my box = slow.
> netscape 6,7+ too ugly for words.
You try Opera6 and I'll try to make time to get my website update
netscape4 "friendly."
Allan. (ARRae)
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:23:01PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> > It could also become cyclic.
>
> It used to be (which explains why there was only one icon there in the
> first place) but that's really not good UI (see the list archives)
UI smUI.
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> For me the Navigate menu is behind the sponsor thank you, and does not
> work.
Which browser and version thereof?
If you are using netscape 4 there doesn't seem to be much I do about
this other than limit to one column.
Allan. (ARRae)
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Well I tried to use 'customize' to get away from your `fancy' black
> > theme, but it seems that there is no escape. How is it supposed to
> > work?
> >
> > JMarc
>
> The only 'themes' that seem to work are the 'simp
On 6 Mar 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have just moved the web pages over to aussie.
[...]
> Please report all and any problems to me.
The Customise cookies don't seem to work anymore.
Perhaps you have:
auto_globals = false
(which I admit is a good thing) but our scripts currently
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I am clearly a brain dead zombie.
Surely, you meant muttonhead?
Allan. (ARRae)
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:09:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > As John has noted, these differnet LFUNs are sufficiently similar to make
> > the thought of collapsing them together attractive.
> >
> > My question: should I use these switches or shoul
On 26 Feb 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> What has Matthias to do with anything?
> (He is not my contact at Trolltech.)
he's the only name we know associated with Trolltech.
Allan. (ARRae)
On 25 Feb 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Joao> Is there someone with a recent tetex that can confirm if the
> Joao> option --src-specials to latex is enabled?
>
> Note that since LyX generates the LaTeX code by itself, it would not
> be too difficult to add src-special by ourselves, for examp
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > A 20 second scan of the code in LoadQueue.C suggests that push_front()
> > and pop_front() is the reason your queue is acting like a stack.
> >
> > Try pushing on one end and popping off the othe
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> 1) I'm still investigating how to solve the startup problem. (images get
> loaded in reverse order). Clues welcomed.
A 20 second scan of the code in LoadQueue.C suggests that push_front()
and pop_front() is the reason your queue is acting like a st
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:44:11PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I think I have just about cleaned up the controllers code so that it is now
> > transparent. As a result of this clean-up I have managed to replace all
> > those boost::signals in fronten
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Allan Rae wrote:
> Yes, but I haven't gotten around to it yet. Will update again and
> commit today.
Haven't had time after all. Feel free to make the one line change
yourself.
Allan. (ARRae)
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:15:37PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > +2003-01-27 Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > +
> > + * insetinclude.C (loadIfNeeded): included files might be under
> > + VCS control so we need l
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> My last trip a few weeks ago was Berlin-London for ~50 EUR (one way,
> including taxes) with a company called "buzz" and it was ok. No food on
> board (well, there was, but you would have to pay extra) but I really don't
> care about that for a two hours
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
> > lottery.
>
> Is that the price of spending the whole life upside down?
No the price for sp
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Currently it looks like neither Asger, Angus and John could come if we
> insisted June 20th.
>
> Currently I have (5 - "ok", 0 - "not ok"):
I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
lottery. I am however making good progress o
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 3:54 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:52:31PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > André, here's a patch to get it to work on this little test case. Else it
> > > get's lost in an infinite loop in handle_op
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 08:54, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Allan Rae wrote:
> > > What I'd like to know is how did Angus know I have purple on my
> > > desktop (as icon backgrounds and title bars as it happens)
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 6:41 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Angus> Why not move lgt into the top level dir?
> >
> > I thought about it, but before moving things around in cvs, ho
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:59:28AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
[...]
> > | I have never been able to use that interface, and it buys us precisely
> > | nothing, and costs a lot.
Poor John, failed at Emacs but rules with vi. When are you vi guys
goi
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:08:25AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> >
> >> Making shorcuts consistent would accelerate user interaction. In fact, I
> >> find a PITA every cleverness in choosing shorcuts. In the
> >> Layout-
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:27:22PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
> > Have I said that I really do not like the dialogs at all?
> > I'd prefere an application completely without dialogs...
>
> Wouldn't we all ? However, this is not possible.
Menues, t
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 12:28:42AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> >> Anyway, they're configurable aren't they, so if Martin wants gold with
> >> purple linings he can have that too.
> >
> > Hey, how about you leave Allan alone n
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, [utf-8] José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 February 2003 18:12, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> > Don't worry. His default colour scheme is _really_ nasty ;-)
>
> It gives a new meaning to dark ages. ;-)
So you don't like black and gold? Or at least black background with
yell
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:39:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > > The chosen scheme doesn't seem to be properly persistent. Cookie problem
> >
> > have even worse problems when using the current LyX website -- try
>
&g
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:58:31PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
> >
> > > > http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~rae/www-user/
> >
> > Comments :
> >
> > The chosen
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:58:31PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
>
> > > http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~rae/www-user/
>
> Comments :
>
> The chosen scheme doesn't seem to be properly persistent. Cookie problem
> ?
Browser problem. As best as I can see from my te
and you can see what a mess I've made here:
http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~rae/www-user/
There is still a bit of cleaning up to do in the php code and in the
css but it should all look good in links, lynx, IE, Konq and Mozilla
(and its derivatives). Don't tell me it's broken in Netscape 4
b
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:37:19PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Does someone want to comment on this bug fix? For example, may I
> > commit it or not? The bug isn't in Bugzilla as far as I can see
> > but that doesn't m
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Allan Rae wrote:
> An annoying bug in multipart document support occurs when you use a
> VCS like RCS on the documents. Load the master, update DVI to get all
> the other parts loaded, now try to edit one of the auto-loaded docs.
> You can't because t
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Rod Pinna wrote:
> > I keep getting "Error 400" when trying to access bugzilla.lyx.org.
> > Any ideas?
>
> You get that with http://... (at least I do). Try it with https://...
Thanks Rod. It seems out bugzilla mailer inserts the wrong protocol
for the website.
Allan. (ARRa
nsets/ChangeLog23 Jan 2003 16:23:41 - 1.552
+++ src/insets/ChangeLog30 Jan 2003 04:05:54 -
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2003-01-27 Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * insetinclude.C (loadIfNeeded): included files might be under
+ VCS control so we need loadLy
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=848
I get "Error 400" attempting to get to bugzilla.lyx.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> ---
so you won't have to put up with my making suggestions I haven't time
to help implement. That's my Christmas present to you all ;-)
I will take a copy of the latest CVS HEAD and lyx-1.2.x just in case I
get bored with playing powermanga, watching DVDs or playing on my
brothers Playstation2 (or I
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:35:53AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > > The preference of an external editor should be stated by setting the
> > > EDITOR environment variale to an appropriate value. No need to re-invent
> > > the wheel...
> >
> > That'
On 4 Dec 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, John Levon wrote:
> |
> | [...]
> | > With all that administration, I'm even less inclined to do so then.
> | >
> | > CVS is worse at ha
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, John Levon wrote:
[...]
> With all that administration, I'm even less inclined to do so then.
>
> CVS is worse at handling conflicts in such cases than patch is
But at least CVS allows others to keep up to date with your work and
fiddle along with you. All you need to do is w
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 11:39:49PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > | I intend to soon when I find a merging guide that works as advertised
> > | (neither of Lars' do)
> >
> > sure they do...
> > (what is not working?)
>
> Trying to merge up trunk c
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Michael A. Koziarski wrote:
> Oh don't forget that cursed music, hip-hop. It's enough
> > to make you fire a gun next to both ears to remove all trace of hearing
> > =)
> >
>
> I'm of the opinion that going to south australia at all is reason enough
> to something similar with
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:22:26PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Now all you have to do is repeat it again in a months time.
>
> *cough*. What have I done to myself !
see:
http://www.lyx.org/news/20001220.php3#editorial1
Allan. (ARRae)
Good work, John. This looks very good.
Now all you have to do is repeat it again in a months time.
Thanks,
Allan. (ARRae)
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Here's the patch. It works fine.
It's looks okay to me too. Although a little extra whitespace in the
substituted code below would be nice (hint: ...str(), 1)
# For all lines containing "fl_add" and a string containing |
@@ -89,12 +89,12 @@ s/\(
While searching with Google to try to find some other sites on the web
that are proud to use XHTML-strict for their web site (in particular
anyone else who uses instead of for formatting) I found
a nice menu structure at:
http://www.webstandards.org/
I quite like their separation of en
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I have been playing a little with the scripts we use to modify the code
> output by fdesign. I have used "sort" to create a minimal list of the
> functions called by the .C file:
>
> EXTERN_FUNCS=extern.tmp
> sed -n 's/extern void \(.*\)/extern "C" void
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:29:04PM +, John Levon wrote:
>
> > Angus, how on earth are we supposed to cope with "Save" ? Must we really
> > add another type to the state machine ? (if there is workaround, we can
> > remove unused PreferencesPolicy)
>
> A
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:09:20PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
[...]
> > If you type fast and you use an unstable cvs LyX you might want to
> > autosave every few seconds. I've been running 30 second autosaves for
> > years -- not t
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:32:08PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I'm still unsure what that gets us. You know what the math parser
> > does. I don't -- other than to guess it creates math insets which
> > Bullets a
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 05:59:56PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > > Can't we (ab)use mathed for the bullets? The validate() would come for
> >
> > How?
>
> Do
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Can't we (ab)use mathed for the bullets? The validate() would come for
How?
> free, and we could store real strings as the parser is already there.
Hmmm... we have strings now. It's just we choose to let the user have
free rein -- and what works now
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 01:22:53PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > It's what is already done. The temporary variables could have been
> > kept in the dialog implementation but by keeping them in the buffer
> > params when you sw
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Allan,
>
> What are these for in bufferparams?
>
> boost::array temp_bullets;
>
> Sorry if I am being thick.
They are used as temporary storage by the GUI frontend -- well XForms
anyway as seen here:
void FormDocument::ChoiceBulletSize(FL_OBJECT * ob, l
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > > I can preview newfile9 but not newfile10. Does anyone know what is wrong
> > > here?
> >
> > \usepackage{pifont}
> > (for \ding{118}) is missing in the preamble.
> ah!
>
> > XForms' dialog inserts it.
>
> no it doesn't. these bullets are usually not s
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On Tue Nov 12, 2002 05:22, Allan Rae wrote:
> > The thing is the bullet tabs were always supposed to have the current
> > bullet "pushed" for whatever level you were setting (ie. the
> > pseudo-push-button was suppose
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:33:04PM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > > Does this count as comment? ;-)
> >
> > I guess not ;-)
> >
> > At the moment the various bullets are put/defined in static strings
> > within the Bullet class. If you have a look in Bul
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> >>
> >>A click on [Apply] should disable the Restore/OK/Apply and
> >>change "Cancel" into "Close"; at least that happens in other
> >>dialogs.
> >>
> >>In the Bibtex dialog, OK and Apply remain enabled.
> >>
> >>Is that a bug in Dial
On 23 Oct 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> IMHO the only benefit with lyxstring now is that it makes lyx
> Lars> compile on some os where it would otherwise get linking errors.
>
> A datapoint with 1.2.2cvs (I know this i
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:23:49PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > up. Sure this doesn't get the Qt Document code written but it still
> > benefits Qt because once the controller is known to work your Qt
>
> Edwin has already w
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> It just makes me sad to see scarce resources (developer time) being directed
> towards the xforms frontend which in turn delays qt with in turn delays inset
> unification which in turn etc etc
We have three frontends. I'm sure there are a few people (mo
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:09:39PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
[...]
> > Geodynamics Conference and "Disaster Area" a thrash-metal, punk,
>
> Seems a bit low-key for them, no ?
They're building up to the climax... You can
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, John Levon wrote:
> > Allan. (ARRae) Now to get home through the dust storm.
> > http://abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s709170.htm
>
> That's nothing ! We're having *quakes*. Well, tremors. Everyone's
> running round like headless chickens; it's kind of unusual (like
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:10:25PM +0200, Asger Kunuk Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>
> > So, opening up will be like pissing in your pants to keep warm.
[...]
> It's still a pity nobody has time for lyx development news any more IMHO
I'm quoting out of context b
On 23 Oct 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> du -s build/src/lyx qt/src/lyx string/src/lyx
> 67692 build/src/lyx
> 82380 qt/src/lyx
> 63820 string/src/lyx
>
> du -sh build qt string
> 368Mbuild
> 468Mqt
> 351Mstring
>
>
> Seems that the only benefit with lyxstring now is faster c
On 22 Oct 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[...]
> Lars> Is the need for lyxstring that _real_?
>
> Lars> the last months should imply that it is not.
>
> I have not compiled 1.3.0cvs on my tru64 station for ages (I do it on
> linux because the machine is faster).
I haven't compiled or even upd
On 19 Oct 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> | Will include all that in my big patch to GUI for 1.4.0cvs, when it's ready.
>
> I am also doing this change as part of the qtclean-2 patch, so you
> will have a couple of conflicts to resolve, sorry about
On 21 Oct 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I thought I should just check out the alleged rumours that lyx could
> not be compiled with included string anymore...
>
> It took me less than 30 minutes to fix it up... it does not seem that
> you lyxstring zealots have tried very hard...
See we told
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Rob Lahaye wrote:
[...]
> Thanks Allan. That helps.
> *BUT*: we are violating the configurable printing setup from the
> preferences here, by allowing input that is very, very specific to
> dvips.
Maybe. How else are people going to specify a number of single pages
or a numbe
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
[...]
> > Related GUI/Coding issues:
> >
> > - Should comma input be permitted ONLY for From field,
> > and not for To field? In other words should we disable following:
> >from 43 to 56,73 ?
> >
> > - And if so, disabl
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, John Levon wrote:
[...]
> iirc the problem was that that code doesn't have a good idea of where
> one title ends and the other begins. At least, that was the problem I
> hit when trying to fix the menus to behave in a bearable manner.
Whatever became of the experimental menu c
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:04:54AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
[...]
> > 4. Sometime between win 3.1.0 and win98 certain windows apps were used to have
> > "Keyboard" topic in their help system. I don't think that was such a bad
> > idea. I personally wouldn't
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
> > Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> But, sure, this is a sample piece of code. You may find this preferable:
> >> CheckedGlueLength(FL_OBJECT * input,
> >> FL_OBJECT * choice,
> >> FL_OBJECT * label=input);
>
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Rob Lahaye wrote:
[...]
> Why does this function only work on check and button widgets?
> When I do, for example:
>
> bc().addReadOnly(dialog_->choice_width_unit)
>
> the choice widget is not disabled for a readonly document!
>
> Does this function only apply to a limite
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Of course if we can test whether the pipe is open before
> attempting to unlink it, then we could definitely delete pipes
> that are closed...
>
> Angus (ignorance showing once again).
Can't we just connect to the pipe (like a client) say "Hello" and if
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Norbert Koksch wrote:
> (Corrected message after hint of Angus Leeming)
>
> I have the following problem:
>
> Sometimes LyX (cvs, xforms 1.0RC4) chrashes with collapsing X-Window after
> generating of the ppm files for the preview.
[...]
> Angus Leeming asked me for a backtra
Finally online again to catchup with your doings. Seem to be making
good progress so far...
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, R. Lahaye wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> >
> > However, there is some serious problems. Different invocations of the
> > print dialog is forgetting various settings such as number of
On 5 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> | Centralising the email addresses etc. in CREDITS means we don't have
> | patches that touch heaps of files like Angus committed recently when
> | he changed his email address. I
On 4 Sep 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> | Fair point. So your preferred heading is
> |
> | /*
> | * \file PreviewLoader.C
> | * Read the file COPYING
> | *
> | * \author Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | */
> |
> | I believe that we
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> The setw() call above should obviously be passed the required number of
> digits. Given the number of snippets, nsnippets, what's the elegant way to
> get ndigits? This is clearly brain-dead:
>
> ndigits = 1 + int(log10(double(nsnippets)));
>
> but
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, R. Lahaye wrote:
> Allan Rae wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
> >
> > Certainly get rid of the option to name which lastfiles
> > file to use (although even this can useful when dealing with multiple
> > LyX versions since
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
>
> Uh how do the people using more than 9 files in lastfiles actually do it
> ? They must hack the source. Any reason they can't continue doing so ?
9 looks a reasonable limit when we're appending lastfiles within the
menu but if as was suggested we move l
On 28 Aug 2002, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > \bind "mouse-button-1" "cursor-set"
> | > \global_inset_bind "mouse-button-1" "popup-dialog"
> |
> | Or maybe
> |
> | \localbind "insetname" "mouse-button-1" "popup-dialog"
> |
> | with "insetname" bei
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 08:11:41PM +0200, Philipp Reichmuth wrote:
>
> > Of course, one could configure a maximum of 9, display up to 9 in the
> > list and then break it at 7 to populate the submenu with 3 entries,
> > but then the configurability loses a
1 - 100 of 1755 matches
Mail list logo
