On 22 Oct 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[...]
> Lars> Is the need for lyxstring that _real_?
>
> Lars> the last months should imply that it is not.
>
> I have not compiled 1.3.0cvs on my tru64 station for ages (I do it on
> linux because the machine is faster).
I haven't compiled or even updated 1.3.0cvs since early August because
I simply do not have the room for two compiled LyX trees anymore -- in
fact I can barely fit a compiled 1.3.0cvs and a maintainer-cleaned
1.2.x. I used to be able to fit both compiled trees when I could use
lyxstring for both. However, as there are now a number of reports of
daily use of 1.3.0 being successful I'll risk switching to using
1.3.0cvs for my thesis and keep my fingers crossed.
Allan. (ARRae)
P.S. You still haven't answered the `du -s` question for your many
trees (std::string vs lyxstring).
