Am 29.01.2016 um 22:46 schrieb Georg Baum:
There are cases where users do not need the latest version. We had this
discussion several times now, and I am not entering it again.
That there are cases where the old version can still be used it not the
point, the point is that there are cases whe
Am 30.01.2016 um 02:11 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
I propose
that Uwe reverts the layout file changes and makes the 504-505 step an
empty
conversion.
Why? So we want to ship a layout for ACM that nobody can use?
So in fact you are proposing to revert a valid fix the re-enable a
feature of LyX.
Your
Am 29.01.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Georg Baum:
So what are we going to do now?
The tex2lyx tests are currently failing because of wrong versions (I guess
because Guillaume did resolve them with git and did not regenerate them
after merging his patches with the ACM layout update).
I don't understa
Am 27.01.2016 um 02:15 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
If you like, I can
add a fileformat change to update existing AGUTeX files to the new class
file. If you want this, this should be done before the beta release.
Hi Scott,
do you have any opinion/decision about this patch?
thanks and regards
Uwe
Am 30.01.2016 um 00:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
Tests seem
to be failing for others but not for you.
As Kornel wrote, he used a wrong version of siggraph. Now it works for
him and Günter reported the same.
regards Uwe
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:32:23PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:11:09AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >>
> >> Am I mistaken or nobody gave Uwe the +1 to do this format increment?
> >
> > As discussed in the other thread, you are correct.
>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:53:36AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-01-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 07:07:43AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> > 3365 - TEMPLATES_export/templates/ACM-siggraph_dvi (Failed)
> >> ...
>
> >> It works with the new version. H
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:47:04AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 27.01.2016 um 23:20 schrieb Kornel Benko:
>
> >Also many tex2lyx tests fail, but that is another story.
>
> I don't see this. I followed strictly the steps in Development.lyx and run
> all the scripts.
Exactly which steps do you tak
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:45:52AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 28.01.2016 um 04:54 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> >Please always post complete patches. Are you worried about file size
> >when attaching a patch?
>
> So you really want to see a patch where more then 300 files where only a
> number i
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:46:24PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> > Am 28.01.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> >
> >> How can the issue be solved if a minimum version is required? I'm
> >> guessing the old version will never work.
> >>
> >> Should the tests assume that the
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 um 13:03:02, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
>> Le 27/01/2016 18:55, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
>> > I have found the motivation to re-do the format increase and the
>> > patches are now committed.
>>
>> Congratulation for your persistence.
>
>
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 28.01.2016 um 17:31 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
>> How can the issue be solved if a minimum version is required? I'm
>> guessing the old version will never work.
>>
>> Should the tests assume that the developer running the tests has the
>> newest version of the LaTeX files ne
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:11:09AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
>>
>> Am I mistaken or nobody gave Uwe the +1 to do this format increment?
>
> As discussed in the other thread, you are correct.
So what are we going to do now?
The tex2lyx tests are currently failing be
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 24.01.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Georg Baum
> :
>>
>> This is the idea, yes, but before implementing it I'd like to know
>> whether it works in principle. This would require a two step approach for
>> the case that no command line option is given: Parse in latin1 encoding
>> u
Le 25/01/2016 20:55, Georg Baum a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 21/01/2016 15:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Sigh. Now that I can test it with an older compiler (gcc 4.6, Ubuntu
12.04) I find that it does not compile in C++98 mode because of
boost::next/prior. This has been fixed
On 01/28/2016 07:11 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 um 13:03:02, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >> Le 27/01/2016 18:55, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >>> I
> have found the
motivation to re-do the format increase and the patches >>> are now
committed. >> >> Congratulation fo
On 2016-01-28, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 07:07:43AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
...
>> >3365 - TEMPLATES_export/templates/ACM-siggraph_dvi (Failed)
>> ...
>> It works with the new version. However, as these templates are for a
>> not-on-CTAN class, I vote to add them t
Hi Uwe,
I attach the screenshot to this mail. It seems there is no corresponding
strings included in .nsh files.
Best regards,
Koji
On 2016年01月28日 08:26, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 27.01.2016 um 09:29 schrieb Koji Yokota:
>
>> I browsed the Windows installer for 2.2 alpha a little bit and found the
18 matches
Mail list logo
