Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:11:09AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> >> Am I mistaken or nobody gave Uwe the +1 to do this format increment? > > As discussed in the other thread, you are correct.
So what are we going to do now? The tex2lyx tests are currently failing because of wrong versions (I guess because Guillaume did resolve them with git and did not regenerate them after merging his patches with the ACM layout update). Does anybody give a +1 subsequently for the ACM layout update? If yes, we should update the version numbers of the tex2lyx tests. If not, I propose that Uwe reverts the layout file changes and makes the 504-505 step an empty conversion. If we do none of the two options then I do not know what our rules are good for. Georg
