Le 25/01/2016 20:55, Georg Baum a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 21/01/2016 15:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Sigh. Now that I can test it with an older compiler (gcc 4.6, Ubuntu
12.04) I find that it does not compile in C++98 mode because of
boost::next/prior. This has been fixed already in master, so I
cherry-picked the commits (see attached).
So what shall I do with this patch? In my view it improves the
situation. The only reason for not pushing it would be if we revert the
boost update patch.
I did not reply since the original code is from me, so I am obviously
biased, but IMO this would be safe enough to apply.
Richard?
JMarc
