toolbar button icons in manuals

2015-12-08 Thread Guenter Milde
Dear Uwe, dear LyX developers, looking at the latest changes in Math.lyx, I see 1. The protected space before the button-icons replaced by an ordinary space. This may lead to line breaks before the icon, e.g. ... ... ... . den Werkzeugleistenknopf [TeX]

Re: 2 compilation questions

2015-12-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 um 07:49:40, schrieb Stephan Witt > Am 09.12.2015 um 06:30 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 21:59:12, schrieb Richard Heck > > > >> On 12/08/2015 06:33 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >>> Am 08.12.2015 um 07:47 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > >

Re: 2 compilation questions

2015-12-08 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 09.12.2015 um 06:30 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 21:59:12, schrieb Richard Heck > >> On 12/08/2015 06:33 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >>> Am 08.12.2015 um 07:47 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: >>> Indeed libintl is not used anymore since 2.1. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>>

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

2015-12-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 um 00:33:23, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:25:10AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 20:09:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > > > > I will try 5.6 beta when it is released. If I cannot reproduce and you > > >

Re: Style question

2015-12-08 Thread Richard Heck
On 12/09/2015 12:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Regarding the following code: > > - > void Text::selectWord(Cursor & cur, word_location loc) > { > LBUFERR(this == cur.text()); > CursorSlice from = cur.top(); > CursorSlice to = cur.top(); > getWord(from, to, loc); > - > > It is not

Style question

2015-12-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
Regarding the following code: - void Text::selectWord(Cursor & cur, word_location loc) { LBUFERR(this == cur.text()); CursorSlice from = cur.top(); CursorSlice to = cur.top(); getWord(from, to, loc); - It is not easy to know whether "to" and "from" are equal to each other because

Re: Link to latest pre-release

2015-12-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:37:37AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > like > > http://www.lyx.org/Download/latest-pre > > the link might fit here > http://www.lyx.org/RoadMap Creating the symlink worked well and I posted the link on the RoadMap. When announcing beta, do you th

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

2015-12-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:25:10AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 20:09:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > I will try 5.6 beta when it is released. If I cannot reproduce and you > > > > can reproduce, we should confirm we are using the same Qt version and > > >

Re: 2 compilation questions

2015-12-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 21:59:12, schrieb Richard Heck > On 12/08/2015 06:33 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Am 08.12.2015 um 07:47 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > > > >> Indeed libintl is not used anymore since 2.1. > > > > Thanks. > > > > So the the remaining point is to rename our Qt4 folder

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

2015-12-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 20:09:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:02:14AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 18:23:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > > > > Beca

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

2015-12-08 Thread Richard Heck
On 12/08/2015 05:48 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > my goal is (or I should say it was) that as many people as possible > use LyX. On over 90% of all desktop PCs Windows is used as OS so to > reach my goal I have to focus on Windows, no matter if I like that OS > or not. This may be true in a global sense,

Re: 2 compilation questions

2015-12-08 Thread Richard Heck
On 12/08/2015 06:33 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 08.12.2015 um 07:47 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > >> Indeed libintl is not used anymore since 2.1. > > Thanks. > > So the the remaining point is to rename our Qt4 folder to "Qt", right? > This is not important but since we agreed to rely on Qt 5 we sh

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

2015-12-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:02:14AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 18:23:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > > Because neither Stephan nor Uwe can reproduce #9683, I have marked it as > > > > "os=

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

2015-12-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 18:23:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > Because neither Stephan nor Uwe can reproduce #9683, I have marked it as > > > "os=unix". Do you agree that #9683 is not a blocker for releasing 2.2.0 > > >

Re: 2 compilation questions

2015-12-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 08.12.2015 um 07:47 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Indeed libintl is not used anymore since 2.1. Thanks. So the the remaining point is to rename our Qt4 folder to "Qt", right? This is not important but since we agreed to rely on Qt 5 we should rename before 2.2.0 final is released. rega

MSCV 2013 LyX dependencies are available

2015-12-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Here are the required dependencies to build LyX with MSVC 2013: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX-Windows-Deps/ It contains a fresh compiled version of libhunspell, iconv and zlib. It contains also a bundled Python 2.7, latest Ghostscript and latest ImageMagick to be able to build a Windows installer. I c

Re: use FindCXX11Compiler.cmake also for MSVC

2015-12-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 08.12.2015 um 23:55 schrieb Kornel Benko: Can you set in development/cmake/modules/FindCXX11Compiler.cmake:93 set(FLAG) instead of set(FLAG "") I tried this but this doesn't make a difference. Also if I comment out the cxx11 part in regex.h the compilation fails as soon a

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

2015-12-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Because neither Stephan nor Uwe can reproduce #9683, I have marked it as > > "os=unix". Do you agree that #9683 is not a blocker for releasing 2.2.0 > > with Qt 5.5.1 on Mac and Windows? (There is potentially another blocker > > in

Re: use FindCXX11Compiler.cmake also for MSVC

2015-12-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 23:55:02, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 23:10:21, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > > > Am 08.12.2015 um 08:51 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > > > I cannot test, since I don't have MSVC. > > > In _my_ implementation of cmake modules (cmake 3.4) the MSVC_

Re: using std_regex on Windows leads to 135 compilation errors

2015-12-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 08.12.2015 um 02:40 schrieb Kornel Benko: Try this patch. With a clean tree I applied the attached cmake patch. Now CXX11 is true but I get many of these compilation errors: "D:\LyXGit\Master\compile-2013\lyx.sln" (ALL_BUILD Ziel) (1) -> "D:\LyXGit\Master\compile-2013\ALL_BUILD.vcxproj.m

Re: use FindCXX11Compiler.cmake also for MSVC

2015-12-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 23:10:21, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > Am 08.12.2015 um 08:51 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > I cannot test, since I don't have MSVC. > > In _my_ implementation of cmake modules (cmake 3.4) the MSVC_VERSION is > > defined for MSVC. > > Applying this patch breaks the compilat

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

2015-12-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 08.12.2015 um 06:13 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Uwe, there is no point why you should burn out because of this. If Windows users have very little spirit to contribute back, you simply announce the stop for a few months or work just on manuals, which is your biggest strength anyway and let new volunt

Re: use FindCXX11Compiler.cmake also for MSVC

2015-12-08 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 08.12.2015 um 08:51 schrieb Kornel Benko: I cannot test, since I don't have MSVC. In _my_ implementation of cmake modules (cmake 3.4) the MSVC_VERSION is defined for MSVC. Applying this patch breaks the compilation. I get the error FATAL_ERROR "A C++11 compatible compiler is required." S

Re: [LyX/master] Make Math.lyx compilable again.

2015-12-08 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:02:24PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 05:47:23PM +0100, Günter Milde wrote: > > commit b50df82e7aba9008bda00928ba25d81ed1f8bc73 > > Author: Günter Milde > > Date: Tue Dec 8 17:42:20 2015 +0100 > > > > Make Math.lyx compilable again. > >

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

2015-12-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 15:25:14, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:26:15AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > > Am 06.12.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 21:45:23, schrieb Stephan Witt > > > > > >> Am 06.12.2015 um 21:00 schr

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

2015-12-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:26:15AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 06.12.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 21:45:23, schrieb Stephan Witt > > > >> Am 06.12.2015 um 21:00 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > >> > >>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Korne

Re: #9840: Instant preview when leaving math inset becomes freezingly slow after a while

2015-12-08 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 03/11/2015 18:13, LyX Ticket Tracker a écrit : #9840: Instant preview when leaving math inset becomes freezingly slow after a while -+ Reporter: gadmm | Owner: lasgouttes Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.2.0 Component: gener

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

2015-12-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:58:27PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > But what I can reproduce is bug #9889. > > With Qt 5.4.2 the Advanced-Find-and-Replace dialog is resizable with 5.5.1 > > it isn't. > > Open Advanced-Find-and-Replace dialog and try some shortcuts there. Does it > work for you? >

Re: [LyX/master] Make Math.lyx compilable again.

2015-12-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 14:02:24, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 05:47:23PM +0100, Günter Milde wrote: > > commit b50df82e7aba9008bda00928ba25d81ed1f8bc73 > > Author: Günter Milde > > Date: Tue Dec 8 17:42:20 2015 +0100 > > > > Make Math.lyx compilable again. >

Re: [LyX/master] Fix a debug comment

2015-12-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:04:33PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I do not really care actually. I was maybe trying to start a flame war > without knowing it :) OK I will do nothing then unless someone thinks I should. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [LyX/master] Make Math.lyx compilable again.

2015-12-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 05:47:23PM +0100, Günter Milde wrote: > commit b50df82e7aba9008bda00928ba25d81ed1f8bc73 > Author: Günter Milde > Date: Tue Dec 8 17:42:20 2015 +0100 > > Make Math.lyx compilable again. > > After removing "unneded" PNG files from the repo, this manual failed.

Re: [LyX/master] Explain why we do not update the local layout

2015-12-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:41:37AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 12/08/2015 01:57 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 07:39:50, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >> + The root reason for this is that we do support converting layouts to > >> older > > The root reason for th

Re: [LyX/master] Explain why we do not update the local layout

2015-12-08 Thread Richard Heck
On 12/08/2015 01:57 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 07:39:50, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> + The root reason for this is that we do support converting layouts to older > The root reason for this is that we do *not* support converting layouts to > older > >> + layout fo