Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 15:25:14, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:26:15AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > > Am 06.12.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>: > > > > > Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 21:45:23, schrieb Stephan Witt > > > <st.w...@gmx.net> > > >> Am 06.12.2015 um 21:00 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > > >> > > >>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > >>>> Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 05:12:30, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > > >>>> <uwesto...@web.de> > > >>>>> Am 05.12.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> We had previously decided to release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.6 [1]. However, > > >>>>>> a > > >>>>>> couple of things have changed since that conversation began that > > >>>>>> make me > > >>>>>> think we should release with 5.5.1: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> 1. 5.5.1 has been released. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Good news: I am able to compile LyX 2.2.0alpha2 with Qt 5.5.1 using > > >>>>> MSVC > > >>>>> 2013 (32bit). > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> 2. 5.6.0beta1 has been delayed five times so far [2]. Supposedly, it > > >>>>>> will be released "as soon as possible" [3] but even if it is released > > >>>>>> soon, we cannot be sure the final 5.6 will be released by the time we > > >>>>>> want to release 2.2.0. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I don't see a bug in Qt 5.5.1 that hinders us from using it for a > > >>>>> final > > >>>>> release. I cannot reproduce bug #9731 with Qt 5.5.1. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> regards Uwe > > >>>> > > >>>> What about http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9683 > > >>>> > > >>>> On Ubuntu-linux I see it with QT 5.5, but not with QT 5.4 > > >>> > > >>> From what I understand [1], Uwe can reproduce #9227 but not #9683. It > > >>> would be interesting to know if this affects Mac. > > >>> > > >>> Scott > > >>> > > >>> [1] http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9683#comment:12 > > >> > > >> I'm not sure I understand the issue with #9683. The mentioned short cut > > >> doesn't exist on Mac. > > > > > > This is not important. _Any_ shortcut in sub-dialogs does not work for me. > > > > > >> If I try Command-Control-O (dialog-show toc) it > > >> works with Qt 5.4.2 and with 5.5.1. But what I can reproduce is bug > > >> #9889. > > >> With Qt 5.4.2 the Advanced-Find-and-Replace dialog is resizable with > > >> 5.5.1 > > >> it isn't. > > > > > > Open Advanced-Find-and-Replace dialog and try some shortcuts there. Does > > > it work for you? > > > > Yes, I tried it with dialog-show toc (Command-Control-O). > > Command-O (file open dialog) works too. > > Kornel, > > Because neither Stephan nor Uwe can reproduce #9683, I have marked it as > "os=unix". Do you agree that #9683 is not a blocker for releasing 2.2.0 > with Qt 5.5.1 on Mac and Windows? (There is potentially another blocker > in #9883 but that is a separate issue.) The reasoning is that we do not > ship binaries for Linux, so we would just document this bug and > recommend using Qt 4.8.x or 5.6.0 (note that I am using 5.6.0dev and I > cannot reproduce). Another reason to recommend 5.6.0 on Linux is #9731.
I do not agree, but since I cannot judge for windows or Mac, I also do not
oppose.
FWIW, I am happy with QT5.4.
I tried QT5.6pre, but it was not better.
I also compiled with gcc5.3, but the effect was the same.
> Scott
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
