Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 20:09:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:02:14AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 18:23:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > <skost...@lyx.org> > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > > > > Because neither Stephan nor Uwe can reproduce #9683, I have marked it > > > > > as > > > > > "os=unix". Do you agree that #9683 is not a blocker for releasing > > > > > 2.2.0 > > > > > with Qt 5.5.1 on Mac and Windows? (There is potentially another > > > > > blocker > > > > > in #9883 but that is a separate issue.) The reasoning is that we do > > > > > not > > > > > ship binaries for Linux, so we would just document this bug and > > > > > recommend using Qt 4.8.x or 5.6.0 (note that I am using 5.6.0dev and I > > > > > cannot reproduce). Another reason to recommend 5.6.0 on Linux is > > > > > #9731. > > > > > > > > I do not agree, > > > > > > Which part do you not agree with? > > > > This one: Do you agree that #9683 is not a blocker for releasing 2.2.0 with > > Qt 5.5.1 on Mac and Windows? > > As I said, I cannot judge, so I can neither agree nor oppose. > > Well you can judge as much as I can, based on information from Stephan > and Uwe. But I see what you mean. OK so you do not disagree then. > > > > > but since I cannot judge for windows or Mac, I also do not oppose. > > > > > > OK. > > > > > > > FWIW, I am happy with QT5.4. > > > > I tried QT5.6pre, but it was not better. > > > > I also compiled with gcc5.3, but the effect was the same. > > > > > > I will try 5.6 beta when it is released. If I cannot reproduce and you > > > can reproduce, we should confirm we are using the same Qt version and > > > then figure out which difference in our systems causes us to see > > > different behavior. > > > > That may work. Other possibility is, I can send you a package and you can > > check if the difference > > is in the compilation, or if our systems have different configuration. > > The package is 27MB big, so better have an ftp server ... > > That is fine too. I prefer to wait until 5.6.0beta jsut because I plan > on testing that anyway.
I found the reason. I am using xmodmap to configure my keyboard. Somehow this
also changes QT behaviour.
Today I disabled the call. Now the menu shortcuts at qt5.5.1 are *working*.
This does not please me, because now I don't have my preferred dead keys etc ..
But it explains, why others don't see it.
Have to investigate :(
> Scott
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
