Am Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 um 00:33:23, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:25:10AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 20:09:15, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > <skost...@lyx.org> > > > > > > I will try 5.6 beta when it is released. If I cannot reproduce and you > > > > > can reproduce, we should confirm we are using the same Qt version and > > > > > then figure out which difference in our systems causes us to see > > > > > different behavior. > > > > > > > > That may work. Other possibility is, I can send you a package and you > > > > can check if the difference > > > > is in the compilation, or if our systems have different configuration. > > > > The package is 27MB big, so better have an ftp server ... > > > > > > That is fine too. I prefer to wait until 5.6.0beta jsut because I plan > > > on testing that anyway. > > > > I found the reason. I am using xmodmap to configure my keyboard. Somehow > > this also changes QT behaviour. > > Today I disabled the call. Now the menu shortcuts at qt5.5.1 are *working*. > > This does not please me, because now I don't have my preferred dead keys > > etc .. > > But it explains, why others don't see it. > > Have to investigate :( > > Good job figuring that out! I would like to learn more about Qt someday > and even try to be involved with the dev/user mailing list, but that is > long time away. In this case, it would be nice to create a minimal > example and ask them what's going on, but I think it would take a lot of > time.
Looks like 'keycode 133' changed. I had Meta_L, but default now is Super_L. Same for 'keycode 134', Meta_R -> Super_R Works now :), until next change :( I agree now that #9683 is not a blocker ... > Scott Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.