Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
> D:\LyXSVN\lyx-devel\src\boost.cpp(31) : error C2039:
'diagnostic_information' :
> is not a member of 'std::exception'
> C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio
9.0\VC\include\exception(95) : see
> declaration of 'std::exception'
> sco
Uwe Stöhr schrieb:
> D:\LyXSVN\lyx-devel\src\boost.cpp(31) : error C2039:
'diagnostic_information' :
> is not a member of 'std::exception'
> C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio
9.0\VC\include\exception(95) : see
> declaration of 'std::exception'
> scons: *** [release\s
1. commentaries '# turn off dots' wrong (copy&paste repetition bug)
2. i guess that Style Braille_(mirror_off) should contain
dashed version of LeftMargin and LabelString.
You are in both cases right, thanks for fixing this.
regards Uwe
Hi,
I think I have located the problem.
I was downloading the .sty files to the MiKTex2.7 directory, but LyX
was looking in the MiKTeX2.6 directory. Even though MiKTeX2.7 was
installed at the same time as LyX. I changed where LyX was looking
for the files and it is now working.
Cheers,
> D:\LyXSVN\lyx-devel\src\boost.cpp(31) : error C2039: 'diagnostic_information'
:
> is not a member of 'std::exception'
> C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio
9.0\VC\include\exception(95) : see
> declaration of 'std::exception'
> scons: *** [release\src\boost.obj] Error 2
Uwe
>> When no Qt functions are used we have to switch between "/" and "\" manually:
>
> What about this patch?
It doesn't fix the bug.
I don't understand why this bug appears only in trunk and not in branch. And I also don't understand
why this bug disappears as soon as I pressed OK in the prefere
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the third release candidate of the upcoming LyX
version 1.6.0 for Windows.
NOTE: LyX 1.6rc3 is not a stable release! That means it is stable enough for
testing, but expect
inconsistencies and regressions. This preview release is build for interest
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> that you will do the lfun handling when the patch is applied.
interesting interpretation of 'lfuns will be sorted later.' :)
but ok, i'll do that.
pavel
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > But maybe using the boost exception class is not intended here.
> > When we update I will check it.
>
> Note that with http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/26478 I get an
> error on Solaris. I have to revert it to be able to compile.
on linux too.
pavel
>> + case LFUN_CELL_FORWARD:
>> + case LFUN_CELL_BACKWARD:
>
> lfuns issue remain unaddressed/unapplied. either introduce correct lfun naming
> or at least properly change doxygen documentation of these.
Well, in you said in
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg144175.ht
On 30/09/2008 19:36, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
* http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5028
Crash in split view
Can wait for 1.6.x
* http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5046
shift select makes lyx assert when cursor follow scrollbar
Can wait for 1.6.x
* htt
leuven edwin wrote:
> Abdel wrote:
> > I am not very keen on adding this check box
>
> if i understand things correctly this checkbox is supposed to hide the
> symptom without solving the underlying problem. am i right?
no these are two different workflow modes how to use outliner.
> > but if t
Ok. So, for now I will apply patch #3, then we will see.
Good.
JMarc
Abdel wrote:
> I am not very keen on adding this check box
if i understand things correctly this checkbox is supposed to hide the symptom
without solving the underlying problem. am i right?
> but if this is the only solution to keep each type of user happy, why not...
because it leads to ui-blo
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 05:43:16PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >> In a branch I've updated to boost 1.36:
> >>
> >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/log/lyx-devel/branches/personal/kuemmel/boost_1_36
> >>
> >> Shouldn't we also update trunk? I know we are in the
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> So, the checkbox you are proposing will govern the call to
>>> setTreeDetph()?
>>>
>>
>> strictly speaking i would like to have ui switch between those two modes
>> distinguished here:
>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/26637
>>
>
> OK, that was my understa
/Users/sts/Quellen/mac/lyx-scope-dynmacro/src/boost.cpp: In function
'void boost::throw_exception(const std::exception&)':
/Users/sts/Quellen/mac/lyx-scope-dynmacro/src/boost.cpp:31: error:
'const class std::exception' has no member named
'diagnostic_information'
Stefan
Am 30.09.2008 um 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: uwestoehr
> Date: Tue Sep 30 20:00:02 2008
> New Revision: 26647
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/26647
> Log:
> add support for TABs in Listings, fileformat change, fixes
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 , patch by Vincent, lyx2lyx and
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 30/09/2008 21:24, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4693
Exporting files doesn't create the files in the correct folder
I can't solve this one because I cannot reproduce it and Uwe can't
debug
José Matos wrote:
You can download LyX 1.6.0rc3 here (the .bz2 are compressed with bzip2,
which yields smaller files):
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-1.6.0rc3.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-1.6.0rc3.tar.bz2
Some files in these directories are not in
On 30/09/2008 21:11, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 07:50:59AM +0800, hzluo wrote:
I'd like to see a somewhat more verbose explanation than 'does not work
sometimes' before introducing a platform specific monstrosity like that
into LyX sources.
Is this related or unrelated?
On 30/09/2008 21:24, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4693
Exporting files doesn't create the files in the correct folder
I can't solve this one because I cannot reproduce it and Uwe can't
debug in WinXP64 apparently. We
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 07:34:39PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 30 sept. 08 à 08:43, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
>
> > After the introduction of InsetInfo, chkconfig.ltx does not generate
> > chkconfig.sed anymore. However, when chkconfig.ltx checks for the EC
> > fonts, it still adds t
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4693
Exporting files doesn't create the files in the correct folder
I can't solve this one because I cannot reproduce it and Uwe can't
debug in WinXP64 apparently. We need someone able to step by step
debug
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4693
Exporting files doesn't create the files in the correct folder
I can't solve this one because I cannot reproduce it and Uwe can't debug
in WinXP64 apparently. We need someone able to step by step debug this
problem under Wi
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 07:50:59AM +0800, hzluo wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'd like to see a somewhat more verbose explanation than 'does not work
>> sometimes' before introducing a platform specific monstrosity like that
>> into LyX sources.
>>
>>
>> Is this related or unrelated?
>
> This patch just expired.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:11:52AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> >>> i tend for 3. solution but would like to hear your opinions.
> >>>
> >> I prefer 2, kind off. This can be done completely in the frontend using
> >> simple string comparison techniques and session manageme
José Matos wrote:
I would prefer after rc3. We are putting too much in the same plate.
OK, I've commited the update.
--
Peter Kümmel
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> * http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5028
> Crash in split view
>
> Can wait for 1.6.x
>
> * http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5046
> shift select makes lyx assert when cursor follow scrollbar
>
> Can wait for 1.6.x
>
> * http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Le 30 sept. 08 à 08:43, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
After the introduction of InsetInfo, chkconfig.ltx does not generate
chkconfig.sed anymore. However, when chkconfig.ltx checks for the EC
fonts, it still adds the result by using the \AddVariable macro that
now creates chkconfig.vars only. This
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:10:11AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
>
> package and fonts are now dynamically detected. Why these two cannot
> be handled correctly by InsetInfo?
They can be handled correctly provided that they appear in packages.lst.
The bug is due to the fact that chkconfig.ltx is not writ
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 30/09/2008 18:46, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 17:39:16 rgheck wrote:
Well, I've never been entirely clear what exactly counted as a format
change, but this doesn't seem to be one to me. You're allowing user
control of the display of these insets
On 30/09/2008 18:46, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 17:39:16 rgheck wrote:
Well, I've never been entirely clear what exactly counted as a format
change, but this doesn't seem to be one to me. You're allowing user
control of the display of these insets, but there's no issue ab
On 29/09/2008 19:57, José Matos wrote:
Hi, I am going to rename the tar balls placed in my area as rc3 (that
is svn revision 26576). I will tag the release tomorrow morning (GMT
time).
Now that rc3 is going to be out I would like to ask what is missing
before releasing a proper 1.6.0? Surel
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 17:39:16 rgheck wrote:
Well, I've never been entirely clear what exactly counted as a format
change, but this doesn't seem to be one to me. You're allowing user
control of the display of these insets, but there's no issue about the
actual format
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 17:39:16 rgheck wrote:
> Well, I've never been entirely clear what exactly counted as a format
> change, but this doesn't seem to be one to me. You're allowing user
> control of the display of these insets, but there's no issue about the
> actual format of anything chan
On 30/09/2008 16:01, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Yes, well, that's a compromise...
i think this should be governed by some additional checkbox, but as you
don't
like it maybe the context menu is the solution?
So, the checkbox you are proposing will govern th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/26646
Log:
Cleanup and layoutification of the InsetInfo class.
* InsetInfo.cpp (InsetInfo): derive from InsetCollapsable instead of
InsetText, so that we can use InsetLayout. Should be reverted wh
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, see http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297 for background info.
>
> Before the introduction of InsetInfo, the LaTeXConfig.lyx file was being
> generated from the template LaTeXConfig.lyx.in by replacing st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/26646
> Log:
> Cleanup and layoutification of the InsetInfo class.
>
> * InsetInfo.cpp (InsetInfo): derive from InsetCollapsable instead of
> InsetText, so that we can use InsetLayout. Should be reverted when the
>
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe a bug in Qt Designer 4.4. Could you try to open TocUi.ui in the
> 4.2 version and save it again?
I daren't change this thing since I do not understand what it does, but
all I can say is that the hor/vert sizes of the list in designer appear
as
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Yes, well, that's a compromise...
>
>> i think this should be governed by some additional checkbox, but as you
>> don't
>> like it maybe the context menu is the solution?
>>
>
> So, the checkbox you are proposing will govern the call to setTreeDetph()?
strictly spea
On 30/09/2008 15:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I do not know when this started, but I notice that the list in the
outline is now ridiculously small (which was not the case in 1.5). See
screenshot.
Ouch... the size is correct here on Wi
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I do not know when this started, but I notice that the list in the
>> outline is now ridiculously small (which was not the case in 1.5). See
>> screenshot.
>
> Ouch... the size is correct here on Windows.
This is qt 4.2.3 BTW
JMarc
On 30/09/2008 15:11, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/26639
Log:
Add a "List of Changes" in the Navigator. The list is updated only when the
document structure is reset or when the update button is clicked. Some work is needed to
Public release of LyX version 1.6.0 (release candidate 3)
=
We are pleased to announce the third release candidate of LyX 1.6.0.
LyX 1.6.0 will be the culmination of 14 months of hard work since the
release of the LyX 1.5 series. We sincerel
On 30/09/2008 14:24, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
OK I can reproduce a slowdown in debug mode when the slide is set to the
maximum.
moving with cursor in maximum slider position is a typical case when this
happens. in fact the m
On 30/09/2008 14:28, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I just checked and there is only one reset of TocModels. I guess you are
talking about the individual TocModel reset? Of course, there is as much
reset as there are models.
which triggers one more question - is it neede
On 30/09/2008 14:05, Pavel Sanda wrote:
+ change_list.insert(it, TocItem(dit, 1, str));
+ }
+ }
my gcc doesnt like this.
make[4]: Entering directory `/mnt/teral/lyx/devel/src'
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I just checked and there is only one reset of TocModels. I guess you are
> talking about the individual TocModel reset? Of course, there is as much
> reset as there are models.
which triggers one more question - is it needed to rebuild all individual
tocmodel when onl
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
OK I can reproduce a slowdown in debug mode when the slide is set to the
maximum.
>>>
>>> moving with cursor in maximum slider position is a typical case when this
>>> happens. in fact the maximum slider is for me just the consequence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: younes
> Date: Tue Sep 30 13:06:34 2008
> New Revision: 26639
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/26639
> Log:
> Add a "List of Changes" in the Navigator. The list is updated only when the
> document structure is reset or when the update button is clicked
On 30/09/2008 11:40, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The list is presented as follow:
Deletion (author1)
Insertion (author2)
Insertion (author1)
Insertion (author2)
It would be nice to think about a more compact represe
On 30/09/2008 11:01, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 30/09/2008 10:54, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
OK I can reproduce a slowdown in debug mode when the slide is set to
the
maximum.
moving with cursor in maximum slider position is a typical case when
this
happens. in fact the max
>Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> The list is presented as follow:
>>>
>>> Deletion (author1)
>>> Insertion (author2)
>>> Insertion (author1)
>>> Insertion (author2)
>
>It would be nice to think about a more compact representation, maybe
with
>an icon (plus o
On 30/09/2008 11:44, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The list is presented as follow:
Deletion (author1)
Insertion (author2)
Insertion (author1)
Insertion (author2)
It would be nice to think about a mor
On 30/09/2008 11:40, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The list is presented as follow:
Deletion (author1)
Insertion (author2)
Insertion (author1)
Insertion (author2)
It would be nice to think about a more compact represe
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The list is presented as follow:
>>
>> Deletion (author1)
>> Insertion (author2)
>> Insertion (author1)
>> Insertion (author2)
It would be nice to think about a more compact representation, maybe
with an icon (plus or minus) or a
On 30/09/2008 10:05, leuven edwin wrote:
since you insist ;-) i would prefer this:
+ author1
Deletion:
Insertion:
+ author2
Insertion:
Deletion:
...
But then we won't have the synchronous navigation, don't know if this is
important to have though..
On 30/09/2008 10:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
This small patch adds a much desired feature without any sensible
performance penalty: List of changes in the Navigator pane.
Great idea.
Or we could also put the author first in order to make use of the sort
che
On 30/09/2008 10:54, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
OK I can reproduce a slowdown in debug mode when the slide is set to the
maximum.
moving with cursor in maximum slider position is a typical case when this
happens. in fact the maximum slider is for me just the conseque
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> OK I can reproduce a slowdown in debug mode when the slide is set to the
> maximum.
moving with cursor in maximum slider position is a typical case when this
happens. in fact the maximum slider is for me just the consequence of not
having persistency...
> One simple so
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I just checked and there is only one reset of TocModels. I guess you are
> talking about the individual TocModel reset? Of course, there is as much
> reset as there are models.
ah yes, i put the breakpoint in the wrong place then ;)
pavel
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> There is no sensible delay under Windows, are you sure stdlib-debug is
> disabled?
>
>> - the code would be bigger than just freezng version
>>
>
> But a freezing checkbox is an additional control that encumber the dialog.
> I am definitely against that.
hum. but i
> This small patch adds a much desired feature without any sensible
> performance penalty: List of changes in the Navigator pane.
>
Great idea.
> Or we could also put the author first in order to make use of the sort
> check box:
> author1 - Deletion:
> author2 - Insertion:
> author1
since you insist ;-) i would prefer this:
> + author1
>Deletion:
>Insertion:
> + author2
>Insertion:
>Deletion:
> ...
>
On 29/09/2008 10:02, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hello,
This small patch adds a much desired feature without any sensible
performance penalty: List of changes in the Navigator pane.
The list is presented as follow:
Deletion (author1)
Insertion (author2)
Insertion (author1)
Insert
On 30/09/2008 00:11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
i tend for 3. solution but would like to hear your opinions.
I prefer 2, kind off. This can be done completely in the frontend using
simple string comparison techniques and session management. Each time a
toc reset is re
On 30/09/2008 08:47, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 30/09/2008 00:11, Pavel Sanda wrote:
even now is editation and movement with outliner significantly
slower.
There is no sensible delay under Windows, are you sure stdlib-debug is
disabled?
Even in full debug mode, typing in a section of t
69 matches
Mail list logo
