Bo Peng wrote:
>> >
>> > I guess I need a more detailed description to reproduce it...
>>
>> abcdefgh1w
>>
>> Now do whatever is necessary in your environmet to switch back to the
>> first window.
>
> I see. I need to remove enough chars to make pos > size in the old window.
I think something al
We're redrawing the whole thing, too? Is *that* necessary after
every backspace?!
Everything = the paragraph. That are the rules of the games
currently. I and others have ideas to speed up the drawing
considerable for 1.6.
Stefan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Peter Kümmel wrote:
> | >> | Or happens the dropping only to auto repeated keys?
> | >>
> | >> Only auto-repeated keys.
> | >
> | > OK, if you are really sure only auto-repeated keys will be dropped,
> | > I think your pa
On 5/31/07, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have tagged the first release candidate for 1.5.0. I have placed the
release in the usual place http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.5/
If there are no last minute problems these packages will be moved to the
official place and
Hi,
I have tagged the first release candidate for 1.5.0. I have placed the
release in the usual place http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.5/
If there are no last minute problems these packages will be moved to
the
official place and a public announcement will be made.
Reg
Dov Feldstern schrieb:
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the
GNU General Public License version 2 or later.
You can put me as "RTL-related fixes"
Thanks, I added you to the credits.
regards Uwe
Figure/Table caption support is broken in new version.
Please see bug:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3750
I implemented a dirty workaround by manually inserting
a Caption inset. Details can be found in my reply for
that bug.
And my patch has several other enhancements:
(1) Support for
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Dov Feldstern schrieb:
Could you add me, too, once you're at it? I don't think I'm in there,
either...
Of course, when you tell me what you have contributed and when you send
me a link to your GPL statement in the lyx-devel list in this mail archive:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx
Dov Feldstern schrieb:
Could you add me, too, once you're at it? I don't think I'm in there,
either...
Of course, when you tell me what you have contributed and when you send me a link to your GPL
statement in the lyx-devel list in this mail archive:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel
regards Uw
On Thursday 31 May 2007 22:05:31 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Yes, quite sure
>
> + if (e->isAutoRepeat()) {
> + ...
> + }
Could you shove it in, please?
> --
> Lgb
--
José Abílio
> Uwe, Mostafa's a veteran...
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/82156
Oops. I asked because he is currently not listed in our credits. I'll add him
now.
thanks and regards
Uwe
On Thursday 31 May 2007 22:20:59 Bo Peng wrote:
> Currently, key=value,key=value1 is disallowed but this is a valid
> usage of listings parameters. (e.g. emph={key1},emph={key2} ) The
> attached patch fixes this. OK to apply? Jose?
>
> Bo
OK.
--
José Abílio
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Peter Kümmel wrote:
| >> | Or happens the dropping only to auto repeated keys?
| >>
| >> Only auto-repeated keys.
| >
| > OK, if you are really sure only auto-repeated keys will be dropped,
| > I think your patch should go into RC1.
|
| BUT, I also had
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello Mostafa,
your patch has been applied by José. Many thanks for your work!
Would you agree to publish your work together with LyX under the GPL
license version 2 or later? If yes, then please reply an email to this
list where you state this:
"Hereby I grant permission t
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | > If you go aab
> | > | > then the b, might be dropped. I have not tested.
> | > | >
> | > | > B
Currently, key=value,key=value1 is disallowed but this is a valid
usage of listings parameters. (e.g. emph={key1},emph={key2} ) The
attached patch fixes this. OK to apply? Jose?
Bo
Index: src/insets/InsetListingsParams.cpp
===
--- sr
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:08:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Andre Poenitz wrote:
| > | > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:12:56PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
| > | >
| > | >>> I tried to do someth
Stefan, you are aware of
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/80783 and
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/81100, right?
Do they answer your questions? (It's a little hard to tell in your
images what the differences are...)
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
For those who
On Thu, 31 May 2007 13:20:16 +0100
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 13:00:35 Micha Feigin wrote:
> >
> > The patch is attached.
>
> What is the status of this patch? Would you like us to consider this to rc2
> or to 1.5.x (x>0)?
>
> > Micha
>
As far as I'm conc
Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> | Or happens the dropping only to auto repeated keys?
>>
>> Only auto-repeated keys.
>
> OK, if you are really sure only auto-repeated keys will be dropped,
> I think your patch should go into RC1.
BUT, I also had a Qt based patch which only discards auto repeated
keys, and
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:54 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src
>> Attached find the file splash.lyx which is the translation of the English
>> version into Farsi.
>
> Could you, please, update the patch to support Farsi? Specifically the patch
> to Encoding does not apply cleanly anymore...
José, you committed the Farsi patch so I think you should also com
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > If you go aab
| > | > then the b, might be dropped. I have not tested.
| > | >
| > | > But sure, quite a few will be dropped. (w
Hello Mostafa,
your patch has been applied by José. Many thanks for your work!
Would you agree to publish your work together with LyX under the GPL license version 2 or later? If
yes, then please reply an email to this list where you state this:
"Hereby I grant permission to license my contri
José Matos
Thu, 31 May 2007 08:26:07 -0700
On Thursday 31 May 2007 10:08:31 Anders Ekberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached find a patch that aims to (at least partly) solve bug 3313.
> Currently, an attempt to export a document containing any unicode
> character (for example an en dash) to LyX1.4 result
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
checkBufferStruc
For those who want to try it out (for reference please look at the
single patches), here is everything together in one patch.
Stefan
rtl.patch
Description: Binary data
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including anothe
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:54 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
checkBufferStruc
For those who know the bidi mechanisms in tex (I cannot compile the
example on my system, fonts missing...):
Bild 4.png
Description: application/applefile
<>
Bild 6.png
Description: application/applefile
<>
What makes more sense?
Explanation: It's about the spaces. In the first example the
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Ok, makes sense. The character then entered should be with the font of
the character at that position.
Stefan --- once you're at it, should Text2.cpp:768 (in setCurrentFont)
be changed:
- if ((pos > 0 && cur.boundary()) || pos == cur.lastpos())
--pos;
+ if
Hello
in
void InsetMathNest::doDispatch(Cursor & cur, FuncRequest & cmd)
is this still neccessary?
case LFUN_SELF_INSERT:
...
// Don't record undo steps if we are in macro mode and
// cmd.argument is the next character of the macro name.
//
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:08:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Andre Poenitz wrote:
> | > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:12:56PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> | >
> | >>> I tried to do something like this so I didn't have the same code in two
> | >
> Actually, I do not think that I like it much, in particular since we
> do not use std::locale at other places?
$ grep -r std::locale * |wc -l
55
> Isn't it possible to do the same with setlocale?
I didn't get what you mean. How can I collate two strings using setlocale ?
Or you mean to rewr
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > If you go aab
> | > then the b, might be dropped. I have not tested.
> | >
> | > But sure, quite a few will be dropped. (which is just what we
> | > want if we are too slow to ge
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
checkBufferStructure(cur.b
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 04:02:42PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:12:56PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >
> >>>I tried to do something like this so I didn't have the same code in two
> >>>places:
> >>>QModelIndex & QCitationDialog::getSelectedIndex(
Andre Poenitz wrote:
We want to get 1.5 out of the door.
we all agree on that one
Multiple views make LyX crash. Nobody is seemingly able to fix it in
a reasonable time frame.
you provided a reproducable way to crash lyx (being the responsible
grown-up you are ;) let's see whether abdel or
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > If you go aab
| > then the b, might be dropped. I have not tested.
| >
| > But sure, quite a few will be dropped. (which is just what we
| > want if we are too slow to get them in.)
| >
|
| What if you have a
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 04:01:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >Richard Heck wrote:
> >
> >>I tried to do something like this so I didn't have the same code in two
> >>places:
> >>QModelIndex & QCitationDialog::getSelectedIndex(QListView *) {
> >> QModelIndexList const sel
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
checkBufferStructure(cur.buffer(), cur);
}
- if (cur.pos() == cur
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Peter Kümmel wrote:
> | >
> | > And no keys will be dropped?
> | >
> | > We could also put in your patch, as it is only a problem on Linux.
> | > Do you think we could use QApplication::synxX() instead of the X11
> | > c
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | José Matos wrote:
> | > | > On Thursday 24 May 2007 18:17:37 Peter Kümmel wrote:
> | > | >> The event_1 patch gives better results
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:10 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Anyhow, to reproduce:
1) type a long long string with no space, until it breaks to the
next line.
2) from the last position in the paragraph (it only works from
there) start bac
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Peter Kümmel wrote:
| >
| > And no keys will be dropped?
| >
| > We could also put in your patch, as it is only a problem on Linux.
| > Do you think we could use QApplication::synxX() instead of the X11
| > call?
|
| The Qt code:
|
http://websvn.kde.o
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | José Matos wrote:
| > | > On Thursday 24 May 2007 18:17:37 Peter Kümmel wrote:
| > | >> The event_1 patch gives better results on systems
| > | >> with a fast enough grap
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Anyhow, to reproduce:
1) type a long long string with no space, until it breaks to the next
line.
2) from the last position in the paragraph (it only works from there)
start backspacing. When you try to delete the last remaining
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
| > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:12:56PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
| >
| >>> I tried to do something like this so I didn't have the same code in two
| >>> places:
| >>> QModelIndex & QCitationDialog::getSelectedIndex(QListView *) {
| >
Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> And no keys will be dropped?
>
> We could also put in your patch, as it is only a problem on Linux.
> Do you think we could use QApplication::synxX() instead of the X11
> call?
The Qt code:
http://websvn.kde.org/*checkout*/trunk/qt-copy/src/gui/kernel/qapplication_x11.cpp
Am 31.05.2007 um 21:57 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit
separately). Then it didn't compile --
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 31 May 2007 20:50:54 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > My patch works for all "key" variants. that is entered through
| > auto-keying. Basically all key events that we failt to handle because
| > auto-repeat is too fast are dropped.
|
| What is
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:12:56PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
I tried to do something like this so I didn't have the same code in two
places:
QModelIndex & QCitationDialog::getSelectedIndex(QListView *) {
QModelIndexList const selIdx =
availableLV->selectionMode
>
> I guess I need a more detailed description to reproduce it...
abcdefgh1w
Now do whatever is necessary in your environmet to switch back to the
first window.
I see. I need to remove enough chars to make pos > size in the old window.
Bo
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | José Matos wrote:
> | > On Thursday 24 May 2007 18:17:37 Peter Kümmel wrote:
> | >> The event_1 patch gives better results on systems
> | >> with a fast enough graphic card(?) but does not work
> | >> an older systems.
>
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I tried to do something like this so I didn't have the same code in two
places:
QModelIndex & QCitationDialog::getSelectedIndex(QListView *) {
QModelIndexList const selIdx =
availableLV->selectionModel()->selectedIndexes();
if (selIdx.em
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:53:31PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > I know the rules and I am sometimes even follow them.
>
> You do?
There are some rules that are really hard to break...
Andre'
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Helge Hafting wrote:
| > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >> | What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
| >>
| >> Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
| >>
| >> What was wrong with my patch from months back?
| >>
| >
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit
separately). Then it didn't compile --- there's a semicolon missing on
line 347 of the p
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:41:06PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> >#3785 now.
>
> I guess I need a more detailed description to reproduce it...
abcdefgh1w
Now do whatever is necessary in your environmet to switch back to the
first window.
Backtrace:
[New Thread -1227621488 (LWP 12202)]
wrong pos 8, m
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I know the rules and I am sometimes even follow them.
You do?
> I said 'I will prepare a patch', not 'I will disable multiple views'.
I know, just teasing you. :-)
A/
On Thursday 31 May 2007 20:50:54 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> My patch works for all "key" variants. that is entered through
> auto-keying. Basically all key events that we failt to handle because
> auto-repeat is too fast are dropped.
What is the drawback then?
> --
> Lgb
--
José Abí
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:35:25PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>>
>> > We want to get 1.5 out of the door. Multiple views make LyX crash.
>> > Nobody is seemingly able to fix it in a reasonable time frame.
>> > So the only sensibly solution is t
Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| José Matos wrote:
| > On Thursday 24 May 2007 18:17:37 Peter Kümmel wrote:
| >> The event_1 patch gives better results on systems
| >> with a fast enough graphic card(?) but does not work
| >> an older systems.
| >>
| >> Jose feel free to do what you wa
Bo Peng wrote:
#3785 now.
I guess I need a more detailed description to reproduce it...
It will crash in debug mode only. The only thing to fix and complement
is DocIterator::fixIfBroken() in order to cover all cases. Some of the
test done there are not correct as Alfredo has already noticed.
Helge Hafting wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | What is the problem that you are trying to solve here?
>>
>> Is it my old pet? "Countinued scorrling after key-release"?
>>
>> What was wrong with my patch from months back?
>>
>
> I tried this with todays svn.
> The patch will indeed preve
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:35:25PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > We want to get 1.5 out of the door. Multiple views make LyX crash.
> > Nobody is seemingly able to fix it in a reasonable time frame.
> > So the only sensibly solution is to disable the feature. Note t
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:30:29PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Best thing I can do now is to plead guilty on either not reading your
> > patch or not noticing the added signal. In any case the signal can't
> > be left in. So either someone comes up with a real fi
On Thursday 31 May 2007 20:35:06 Peter Kümmel wrote:
> But one patch which at least fixes the pageup/down-key scrolling
> should go in before RC1.
I intend to release RC1 really soon now, so this patch must wait for RC2.
> Peter
--
José Abílio
#3785 now.
I guess I need a more detailed description to reproduce it...
Bo
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> We want to get 1.5 out of the door. Multiple views make LyX crash.
> Nobody is seemingly able to fix it in a reasonable time frame.
> So the only sensibly solution is to disable the feature. Note that
> I said 'disable', not 'remove'.
I proposed a reasonable fix avoid the c
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:12:56PM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > I tried to do something like this so I didn't have the same code in two
> > places:
> > QModelIndex & QCitationDialog::getSelectedIndex(QListView *) {
> > QModelIndexList const selIdx =
> > availableLV->selectionModel()->se
José Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 24 May 2007 18:17:37 Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> The event_1 patch gives better results on systems
>> with a fast enough graphic card(?) but does not work
>> an older systems.
>>
>> Jose feel free to do what you want.
>
> What is the outcome of your email exchange with
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Best thing I can do now is to plead guilty on either not reading your
> patch or not noticing the added signal. In any case the signal can't
> be left in. So either someone comes up with a real fix or I'll prepare
> a patch to remove the signal and disable multiple views at
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:43:04PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> >> At last someone who don't think I've compromised LyX cleanness for
> >> eternity :-)
> >
> >My dog doesn't either.
>
> Please register your bug to bugzilla and mark it as critical so that
> Abdel can have a look;
#3785 now.
Andre'
Dov Feldstern wrote:
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit separately).
Then it didn't compile --- there's a semicolon missing on line 347 of
the patch file, or at line
Richard Heck wrote:
>
> Still seeking comment on this patch, or permission to commit.
>
> =
>
> The attached patch addresses these bugs
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3741
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3756
> in a way that is compatible with earlier discussion with A
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:43:04PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> >> At last someone who don't think I've compromised LyX cleanness for
> >> eternity :-)
> >
> >My dog doesn't either.
>
> Please register your bug to bugzilla and mark it as critical so that
> Abdel can have a look; or sit down and impleme
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:22:02PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:38:04AM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
What I want to say with this example: the bidi code is in a very bad
state. We are lucky that it is more or less working.
Still seeking comment on this patch, or permission to commit.
=
The attached patch addresses these bugs
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3741
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3756
in a way that is compatible with earlier discussion with Abdel. Here's
what it does:
* In
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:22:02PM +0300, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:38:04AM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> >>What I want to say with this example: the bidi code is in a very bad
> >>state. We are lucky that it is more or less working.
> >
> >I wa
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:13:49PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >So either someone comes up with a real fix
>
> you're volunteering andre?
No. If it were that easy I propbably would have found the time to do so
when I had more time then now.
> >or I'll prepare a patch to r
Am Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2007 18:46 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> OK, got it, sorry. I deleted that because I thought it was just about
> the toqstr() hack; which it was not.
> I've added a more general comment at the top of the file because the
> comment is valid for all use of uc4_to_qchar(), not
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:55:38PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I _never_ said that Angus endorsed the patch, just that he helped me. I
just said that *nobody* commented the approach, period.
Which in the time of an upcoming release plainly means 'rejected'.
Accepte
On Thursday 31 May 2007 17:09:17 Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Stefan has already added it, in a slightly modified form
> (http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18532)
I will not complain. :-)
--
José Abílio
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit separately).
Then it didn't compile --- there's a semicolon missing on line 347 of
the patch file, or at line 279(?) of bufferview_f
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:25:57PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Possibly yes. I have a patch
Abdelrazak> pending for that issue that is not
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:55:38PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >>>Also "fully" and "patch" does not help. And not "angus", "2007",
> >>>"abdel" (or "signal") and a lot of other combinations.
> >
> >I also see that Angus solved your C++ related problem. No less, no
> >mo
> At last someone who don't think I've compromised LyX cleanness for
> eternity :-)
My dog doesn't either.
Please register your bug to bugzilla and mark it as critical so that
Abdel can have a look; or sit down and implement your Alfredo way and
demonstrate to us that your method is better.
It
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:11:25PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Bo Peng wrote:
> >>OK, as this is a fix to a crash and that it also addresses Andre' main
> >>complaint about the memory consumption due to the boost::signal in the
> >>Inset class I'll commit.
> >
> >I have no opinion on the use
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:25:57PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Possibly yes. I have a patch
> >Abdelrazak> pending for that issue that is not OKed A
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:38:04AM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
What I want to say with this example: the bidi code is in a very bad
state. We are lucky that it is more or less working.
I was about to rip it off in the updateInsetsInInsets times as nobody
understood it
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
But, the fact is that it
works, I've yet to see a problem which is due to the heart of the bidi
algorithm. (Do you think you have found one, now?)
Yes, more or less. We have two bidi algorithms at the moment. One is
inside the Bidi class, the other one in the font s
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:06:19PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 31 May 2007 13:50:17 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Thanks. What should I do with the Qt4.1 case? Do I remove the
> > assertion and return '?' or does someone wants to implement the
> > iconv solution?
>
> Could that be plac
Andre Poenitz wrote:
So either someone comes up with a real fix
you're volunteering andre?
or I'll prepare a patch to remove the signal and disable multiple
views at the weekend.
small kids act like this with their even smaller brothers...
Andre Poenitz wrote:
The main problem is that new features (aka "multiple views") crop up
faster than the core can provided the necessary infrastructure, leading
to a mess of 'fixes' just to make it work. The the feature's developer
leaves, nobody understands the code anymore and why a particula
This is not totally fair. The fact is, it's implementing a well-
known, standard, function. To understand it, you probably have to
read up on the Bidi algorithm (I've never done it thoroughly, I
don't know this code, either, and have been trying to avoid it as
much as possible, partly for th
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:55:17AM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> >Feel free to unleash yourself and clean up this mess in the 1.6
> >frame ;-)
>
> That said... are there any tools around supporting refactoring of C++
> code like Eclipse can do it for Java?
Partially. The problem is that C
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:44:06AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >Can anybody please explain me Text::bidi? It keeps a cache of RTL<->LTR
> >levels for a row. But this variable is in the Text class, in the public
> >section. It does not store for which pa
I've tested it yesterday and it was OK so OK :-)
Is this in?
Yes: r18576
Stefan
Abdel.
--
José Abílio
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
