Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | José Matos wrote: > | > On Thursday 24 May 2007 18:17:37 Peter Kümmel wrote: > | >> The event_1 patch gives better results on systems > | >> with a fast enough graphic card(?) but does not work > | >> an older systems. > | >> > | >> Jose feel free to do what you want. > | > > | > What is the outcome of your email exchange with Helge and Lars on this > | > subject? > | > > | > This is an area where that looks like a landmine area, you step in the > wrong > | > place and ... > | > > | >> Peter > | > > | > | > | I'm pretty sure what's going on when my patch "eats" key events. > | Currently only pageup/pagedown key events are dropped. > | But JMark wants a more general approach so that also key gets > | dropped which are mapped by a binding to the scrolling keys. > | I don't know if Lars' patch is better. > > My patch works for all "key" variants. that is entered through > auto-keying. Basically all key events that we failt to handle because > auto-repeat is too fast are dropped. >
And no keys will be dropped? We could also put in your patch, as it is only a problem on Linux. Do you think we could use QApplication::synxX() instead of the X11 call? -- Peter Kümmel
