Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:55:38PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I _never_ said that Angus endorsed the patch, just that he helped me. I
just said that *nobody* commented the approach, period.
Which in the time of an upcoming release plainly means 'rejected'.
Accepted by Jose. Because I reckon that Jose trust me enough in this matter.
I still see no rationale, no constructive critics, nothing, nada, rien!
I think I mentioned iterator registration a couple of times now.
Of course this is exactly what I am kindof doing because I do check the
other cursors i.e. I know which cursors needs to be checked.
So either someone comes up with a real fix or I'll prepare
a patch to remove the signal and disable multiple views at the weekend.
At least you'll do something.
Preventing LyX from crashing or becoming otherwise unusable counts
as 'doing something' in my universe.
I didn't notice you were actively fixing bugs. In my universe, doing
something is at the minimum fixing the bugs you have introduced. And
that's exactly what I was doing.
Anyway, you disgusted me from doing any further work.
Abdel.
