Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > | > | José Matos wrote: > | > | > On Thursday 24 May 2007 18:17:37 Peter Kümmel wrote: > | > | >> The event_1 patch gives better results on systems > | > | >> with a fast enough graphic card(?) but does not work > | > | >> an older systems. > | > | >> > | > | >> Jose feel free to do what you want. > | > | > > | > | > What is the outcome of your email exchange with Helge and Lars on > this > | > | > subject? > | > | > > | > | > This is an area where that looks like a landmine area, you step in > the wrong > | > | > place and ... > | > | > > | > | >> Peter > | > | > > | > | > | > | > | > | I'm pretty sure what's going on when my patch "eats" key events. > | > | Currently only pageup/pagedown key events are dropped. > | > | But JMark wants a more general approach so that also key gets > | > | dropped which are mapped by a binding to the scrolling keys. > | > | I don't know if Lars' patch is better. > | > > | > My patch works for all "key" variants. that is entered through > | > auto-keying. Basically all key events that we failt to handle because > | > auto-repeat is too fast are dropped. > | > > | > | And no keys will be dropped? > > If you go aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaab > then the b, might be dropped. I have not tested. > > But sure, quite a few aaaa will be dropped. (which is just what we > want if we are too slow to get them in.) >
What if you have a slow system but you type with your 12 ;) fingers at a rate of 20 types per second. Then it is not a problem to type as sentence and then to wait a bit until all gets in. Or happens the dropping only to auto repeated keys? > | We could also put in your patch, as it is only a problem on Linux. > | Do you think we could use QApplication::synxX() instead of the X11 > | call? > > If I remember correctly, that call did the wrong thing. > -- Peter Kümmel
