Re: travelling

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:21:28AM +0200, Asger Kunuk Alstrup wrote: > I have booked my ticket. > > I'm flying on flight LH 194 to Leipzig, arriving at 22.25 on the 23th of > July. Urgs, that's late in the evening. > I'm leaving on flight LH 5043 at 18.10 on the 27th of July. > > Andre, how do

Re: debian woody/cvs compile problem (fwd)

2003-07-08 Thread Garst R. Reese
Rod Pinna wrote: > > Bloody buggery...I thought going to testing would avoid this... > > I see there is an automake1.7 deb as well... > > No difference I see... Did you update autoconf as well? Garst

[pezuta@trueno-lejano.com: Suggestions]

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Suggestions gruess Gott, I would like to suggest some improvements to Lyx. Could you see that the developer that handles these things gets my note? 1. ascii export should include all of the text in the document. It doesn't have to be formatted

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:27:49PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > > Alfredo Braunstein: > >> A last minute question: have you checked it works inside floats/minipages > >> etc? I must admit that the whole current "deep" selection thing look like > >> dark magic

Re: [patch] pagebreak

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:22:41PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:28:44PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > Anybody interested in stuff like that? > > Is the screen identical ? Not exactly. Most notably there is the some funny cursor position exactly 'in' the inset. I gues

Re: [patch] pagebreak

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:49:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> Anybody interested in stuff like that? > > Andre> [Not finished, I guess... the paragraph dialog would need some > Andre> adjustment...] > > Andre> I thin

Re: [patch] pagebreak

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:49:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I understand your concern about code, but how often do you really want > to insert such things in the middle of a paragraph? My boss (currently switching to LyX from SW) yesterday told me that it took him more than ten minutes

Re: debian woody/cvs compile problem (fwd)

2003-07-08 Thread Rod Pinna
Bloody buggery...I thought going to testing would avoid this... I see there is an automake1.7 deb as well... No difference I see... Configuration Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Special build flags:warnings assertions xforms-image-loader C Compiler:

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > LFUN_PASTE etc are handled directly in insets/insettext.C (why, I don't > have the palest idea) that calls directly LyXText::pasteSelection, instead > of passing the LFUN down. So I suppose you'll have to add your > overwriteSelection also to insettext.C. Another choice

Re: debian woody/cvs compile problem (fwd)

2003-07-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Rod Pinna wrote: > automake (GNU automake) 1.4-p6 That's probably a bit too old. Juergen.

debian woody/cvs compile problem (fwd)

2003-07-08 Thread Rod Pinna
Just did a complete checkout a few minutes ago, and I still have this problem. Also attached is the (gzipped) config.log. Let me know if there is any other info that would be helpful. Starting make in the src directory (for example) get the compiler going. Rod -- Forwarded message

Re: travelling

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Asger Kunuk Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | P.S. Do we have a sponsor for this years meeting? No. Not to my knowledge. -- Lgb

Re: Do we want a native Qt/win port?

2003-07-08 Thread Asger Kunuk Alstrup
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:25:24AM +0200, Asger Kunuk Alstrup wrote: > > > I understand that statical linking is a problem, but is dynamic linking > > also a problem? > > Not sure, but also requiring each user to take out a license so they can > have the Qt

Re: Do we want a native Qt/win port?

2003-07-08 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:25:24AM +0200, Asger Kunuk Alstrup wrote: > I understand that statical linking is a problem, but is dynamic linking > also a problem? Not sure, but also requiring each user to take out a license so they can have the Qt library doesn't seem to help much ;) regards john

Re: Do we want a native Qt/win port?

2003-07-08 Thread Asger Kunuk Alstrup
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:18:24AM +0200, Asger Kunuk Alstrup wrote: > > > Get a license of Qt for windows so that we can legally redistribute > > binaries. > > Nobody can legally distribute a GPLed app linked against > non-GPL-compatible libraries that do n

Re: travelling

2003-07-08 Thread Asger Kunuk Alstrup
I have booked my ticket. I'm flying on flight LH 194 to Leipzig, arriving at 22.25 on the 23th of July. I'm leaving on flight LH 5043 at 18.10 on the 27th of July. Andre, how do I get from Leipzig to Chemnitz? Regards, Asger P.S. Do we have a sponsor for this years meeting?

Re: Do we want a native Qt/win port?

2003-07-08 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 01:18:24AM +0200, Asger Kunuk Alstrup wrote: > Get a license of Qt for windows so that we can legally redistribute > binaries. Nobody can legally distribute a GPLed app linked against non-GPL-compatible libraries that do not form part of the standard libraries for the targ

Re: Do we want a native Qt/win port?

2003-07-08 Thread Asger Kunuk Alstrup
I'm surprised we do not once again consider the path of least resistance: Get a license of Qt for windows so that we can legally redistribute binaries. How do we do this? 1) Ask Trolltech for a free license. Matthias works there. 2) Ask Trolltech for a discount, and use some of the LyX founds to

Re: [patch] pagebreak

2003-07-08 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:28:44PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Anybody interested in stuff like that? Is the screen identical ? What about inside minipages etc. ? Direct manipulation is good, I definitely like that from the UI side of things. > --- src/text.C1 Jul 2003 11:51:18 -

Re: [patch] pagebreak

2003-07-08 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:49:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > But \newpage does not necessarily end a page. In two column mode, it > So you have \pagebreak (which additionally can take a parameter saying > And then you have \clearpage and \cleardoublepage which additionally > > I know I

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein: >> A last minute question: have you checked it works inside floats/minipages >> etc? I must admit that the whole current "deep" selection thing look like >> dark magic to me (why/when to use the top-level insettext, .i.e >> bv->getLyXTexT() etc) >

Re: [patch] pagebreak

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> Anybody interested in stuff like that? Andre> [Not finished, I guess... the paragraph dialog would need some Andre> adjustment...] Andre> I think none of the pagebreak/line/vspace stuff belongs to the Andre> paragraph but are enti

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Lars> | Delete the ./configure.{ac,in} that it just created. > | > | Lars> Why? (and won't the dependency machinery have some problems with > | Lars> that?) > | > | OK, so a better idea is to get rid of ac213 support and mov

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> | Delete the ./configure.{ac,in} that it just created. | | Lars> Why? (and won't the dependency machinery have some problems with | Lars> that?) | | OK, so a better idea

[patch] pagebreak

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
Anybody interested in stuff like that? [Not finished, I guess... the paragraph dialog would need some adjustment...] I think none of the pagebreak/line/vspace stuff belongs to the paragraph but are entities of their own. Andre' Index: lib/ui/stdmenus.ui =

Re: feature request: ERT lock

2003-07-08 Thread larry
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 04:43:54PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:52:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > You don't need to be a power user to use source control, and depending > on your circumstances, the user may not even need to see the SCS at all True, but it wouldn

Re: [PATCHES] some support for Qt/Mac

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:48:11PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> So do you have a more constructive idea about what we can do? > > Andre> Ignore it until update() is gone. > > Is this related to update() or to bad fonts???

Re: [PATCHES] some support for Qt/Mac

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So do you have a more constructive idea about what we can do? Andre> Ignore it until update() is gone. Is this related to update() or to bad fonts??? JMarc

Re: feature request: ERT lock

2003-07-08 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:52:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Then get a source control system, and use it... > > Unfortunately, I've put LyX in the hands of some less-than-power users. You don't need to be a power user to use source control, and depending on your circumstances, the use

Re: [PATCHES] some support for Qt/Mac

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:11:04PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:02:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Andre> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 11:39:37AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > Andre> wrote: > >

Re: [PATCHES] some support for Qt/Mac

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:02:19PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 11:39:37AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Andre> wrote: > >> What do you mean by OK? Do you mean that the normal LyX will still > >>

Re: LyX/Aqua bug

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On my OSX, there is an application "console" somewhere in the Juergen> Applications folder (in a subfolder; I can't tell you the Juergen> exact location, since I do not have access to the Mac right Juergen> now). There yo

Re: [PATCHES] some support for Qt/Mac

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 11:39:37AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: >> What do you mean by OK? Do you mean that the normal LyX will still >> produce correct symbols with this change? Andre> No. I mean 'I know the patch and

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | Delete the ./configure.{ac,in} that it just created. Lars> Why? (and won't the dependency machinery have some problems with Lars> that?) OK, so a better idea is to get rid of ac213 support and move the files in their proper

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Huang Ying wrote: | >>The "mm" extension doesn't seem to have a port on FreeBSD either. | >>What is actually the difference between gtk+ and gtkmm ? | >> | > | > gtk+ is a toolkit with C api, and gtkmm is a language binding of gtk+ | > that provide the C++

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Rob Lahaye
Huang Ying wrote: >>The "mm" extension doesn't seem to have a port on FreeBSD either. >>What is actually the difference between gtk+ and gtkmm ? >> > > gtk+ is a toolkit with C api, and gtkmm is a language binding of gtk+ > that provide the C++ api of gtk+. I remember there is gtkmm 2.0 port in >

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Should delete what? | | Delete the ./configure.{ac,in} that it just created. Why? (and won't the dependency machinery have some problems with that?) -- Lgb

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Should delete what? Delete the ./configure.{ac,in} that it just created. JMarc

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Ssshhh... my secret thingie is to not update configure.in and Lars> only do configure.in if somebody complains. Lars> That said, I'd be happy to ditch 2.13 right away. I think we should do it. JMarc

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:54:51PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > I tried this and it works fine. Used in insetnote and insetbranch, at > least. > > Good idea or not? Not bad at least. Maybe even good ;-) Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, n

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Andre> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:48:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes | Andre> wrote: | >> | shouldn't go to config/configure.in. configure.ac seems to be | >> re-build | each time ./a

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:50:25PM +0300, Martin Vermeer spake thusly: > > First bug: nested Note/Branch insets don't work properly, the right > mouse click always goes to the outermost one. > > Fix: limit the effect of button 3 to the inset's button area. This begs the question: the phrase

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 04:01:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > note: config/configure.ac... not ./configure.ac Ah! Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:48:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes Andre> wrote: >> | shouldn't go to config/configure.in. configure.ac seems to be >> re-build | each time ./autogen.sh runs. >> >> No. It should to to config/configure.ac

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:15:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:29:07PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > | > Ok, here an improved Note patch. Includes André's corrections and a > | > few of my own. > | > > |

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Huang Ying
> The pkg-config commands are most probably not going to work with FreeBSD: > $ pkg-config --modversion gtkmm-2.0 > No package 'gtkmm-2.0' found > $ pkg-config --modversion libglademm-2.0 > No package 'libglademm-2.0' found > > However, instead, this works on FreeBSD: > $ pkg-config --mo

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Andre> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:58:45PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: | >> The patch contains the the main form, ie the LyXView and Aboutlyx | >> dialog. Just a begining with gtk fronten

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The pkg-config commands are most probably not going to work with FreeBSD: | $ pkg-config --modversion gtkmm-2.0 | No package 'gtkmm-2.0' found | $ pkg-config --modversion libglademm-2.0 | No package 'libglademm-2.0' found | | However, instead, this

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:48:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | shouldn't go to config/configure.in. configure.ac seems to be re-build | > | each time ./autogen.sh runs. | > | > No. It should to to config/configure.ac | | Here it looks a

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:58:45PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: >> The patch contains the the main form, ie the LyXView and Aboutlyx >> dialog. Just a begining with gtk frontend. The render system is >> based on xft including the math t

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:48:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | shouldn't go to config/configure.in. configure.ac seems to be re-build > | each time ./autogen.sh runs. > > No. It should to to config/configure.ac Here it looks as though configure.ac is rebuild from time to time. At

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Rob Lahaye
Huang Ying wrote: > diff -u -r -N lyx-1.4.0cvs/configure.ac lyx-1.4.0cvs_gtk/configure.ac > --- lyx-1.4.0cvs/configure.ac 2003-07-01 17:51:21.0 +0800 > +++ lyx-1.4.0cvs_gtk/configure.ac 2003-07-07 19:15:25.0 +0800 > @@ -182,6 +184,15 @@ > dnl FRONTEND_INCLUDES="-I\${srcdir

Re: feature request: ERT lock

2003-07-08 Thread larry
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:48:17PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > Then get a source control system, and use it... That's rich. Unfortunately, I've put LyX in the hands of some less-than-power users. > Why does using minipage instead of ERT directly provide *any* extra > protection ? You've los

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:58:45PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: | > The patch contains the the main form, ie the LyXView and Aboutlyx | > dialog. Just a begining with gtk frontend. The render system is based on | > xft including the math things. So making su

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Alfredo Braunstein: > A last minute question: have you checked it works inside floats/minipages > etc? I must admit that the whole current "deep" selection thing look like > dark magic to me (why/when to use the top-level insettext, .i.e > bv->getLyXTexT() etc) A good question. I haven't checked i

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:58:45PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: > The patch contains the the main form, ie the LyXView and Aboutlyx > dialog. Just a begining with gtk frontend. The render system is based on > xft including the math things. So making sure that you have configure > the math xft font prop

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Huang Ying
> - you use std::string in many places. The current way of doing things > in LyX is to use '#include "LString.h"' and later 'string' without > std:: qualifier. This is because we provide a lighter std::string > replacement. ok, I will replace them. > - it seems that your code for menus and t

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Huang> The patch contains the the main form, ie the LyXView and Huang> Aboutlyx dialog. Just a begining with gtk frontend. Hello, The patch looks nice indeed. A few things to consider: - you use std::string in many places. The current way of doing things in LyX is to use '#include "LString.h

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Huang Ying
> Ok, but gtk must have something that works for projects like lyx as > well? I think the gtk+ stuff is not appropriate for lyx, using xft directly is better. This is my idea. And I have sent a mail to gtk devel mailing list to listen their advice. Huang Ying

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:54:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:37:15PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > | > N.B: Undoing break-paragraph crashes LyX. This is not related to my patch > | > though. > | > | The c

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Do you have the time for a quick look at that Andre? I know the 'reason', but not the fix. The LyXRow cache is broken by (probably) some iterator invalidation. I think it can be fixed by two or three lines of proper update mag

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> yes, this looks a lot better now. > > Good. Please apply then, if there are no more objections. Thanks. A last minute question: have you checked it works inside floats/minipages etc? I must admit that the whole current "deep" selection

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:37:15PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: | > N.B: Undoing break-paragraph crashes LyX. This is not related to my patch | > though. | | The cache part of the LyXText structure is still broken after an undo... Explain please

Re: Trolltech's confirmation

2003-07-08 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:18:01AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Incidentally, there will be no 3.1.3 most likely. But qt-3.2 is in beta2-phase > and expected to be released not too far from now. Ugh. There's a beta2 ? I'd better get round to checking if they've fixed the fonts things the

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > yes, this looks a lot better now. Good. Please apply then, if there are no more objections. Thanks. > | N.B: Undoing break-paragraph crashes LyX. This is not related to my patch > | though. > > What do you mean? "undo" right after breaking a paragraph? Yes. As easy a

Re: feature request: ERT lock

2003-07-08 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 06:18:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The problem I'm thinking about is the unsophisticated deleting ERT inserts > while working on text. Undo/Revert doesn't survive a document save. Then get a source control system, and use it... > > Why the minipage ? I don't ge

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 01:37:15PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > N.B: Undoing break-paragraph crashes LyX. This is not related to my patch > though. The cache part of the LyXText structure is still broken after an undo... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Se

Re: noupdate branch

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:39:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > | [1] Can I have my yearly "toldyouso" ? | > | > No. This is never helpful and tends to put people in the trenches. | | One a year ? C'mon !! :) Everytime. That is just how it is

Re: noupdate branch

2003-07-08 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:39:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > | [1] Can I have my yearly "toldyouso" ? > > No. This is never helpful and tends to put people in the trenches. One a year ? C'mon !! :) john

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Spitzmueller) writes: | Attached is an updated patch that does also fix bug 441. | Are you joining the party, Lars? yes, this looks a lot better now. | Juergen. | | N.B: Undoing break-paragraph crashes LyX. This is not related to my patch | though. What do you mean?

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > bv->beforeChange(this); > > +// FIXME: WTF doesn't this work? > > +// overwriteSelection(bv->getLyXText()); > > Had a deeper look. The problem is that bv->beforeChange(this) toggles the > se

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:29:07PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: | > Ok, here an improved Note patch. Includes André's corrections and a | > few of my own. | > | > (Is there any way to get new files included in a cvs diff file?)) | | I guess only after

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:29:07PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > Ok, here an improved Note patch. Includes André's corrections and a > few of my own. > > (Is there any way to get new files included in a cvs diff file?)) I guess only after a cvs add. Not sure though. Are you comfortable with th

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, here an improved Note patch. Includes André's corrections and a | few of my own. | | (Is there any way to get new files included in a cvs diff file?)) yes, if you have an CVS account. (then you can "cvs add" the new files.) I'll set one up for y

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Martin Vermeer
Ok, here an improved Note patch. Includes André's corrections and a few of my own. (Is there any way to get new files included in a cvs diff file?)) Martin -- Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Helsinki University of Technology Dept. of Surveying, Inst. of Geodesy P.O. Box 1200, FIN-02015 HUT,

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alfredo> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Why should it be true? We do not want to change the clipboard, do >> we? Alfredo> Ah yes, I reversed the meaning. Sorry. Alfredo> (btw, we should make the cut/copy split as we have done in A

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > bv->beforeChange(this); > +// FIXME: WTF doesn't this work? > +// overwriteSelection(bv->getLyXText()); > Had a deeper look. The problem is that bv->beforeChange(this) toggles the selection... to just drop it seems sa

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:26:25PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > Question: why all the updates? > > It is used all over the place. E.g. It's not your fault. Just leave it in for the time being. > which I am basically emulating here (but see also LFUN_DELETE e

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > To eliminate the realcut argument in favour of splitting cutSel into > cutSel/eraseSel... so I don't keep getting the realcut thing wrong ;^) Certainly a good idea. Go for it. Juergen.

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Question: why all the updates? It is used all over the place. E.g. case LFUN_CUT: update(); cutSelection(true, true); update(); cmd.message(_("Cut")); break; which I am basically emulating

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Andre Poenitz wrote: > Currently testing (Latest, but hopefully fixed problems have been hard > crashs when creating/entering tables and mis-drawings of open footnotes > on LyX startup) I will have a shot at it tonight or tomorrow. > Next step would be to replace almost all getLyXText(bv) in In

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:00:48PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:23:51AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > >> Question: why all the updates? > > > > Because not too many help on BRANCH_NOUPDATE. > > > > SCNR. > > ;-) > > Seriously, if

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:23:51AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> Question: why all the updates? > > Because not too many help on BRANCH_NOUPDATE. > > SCNR. ;-) Seriously, if you need help I'd be glad to, but you will have to say explicitely what to do, because I'm

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:50:47AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Why should it be true? We do not want to change the clipboard, do we? > > Ah yes, I reversed the meaning. Sorry. > > > Alfredo> (btw, we should make the cut/copy split as we have done in > > A

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Huang Ying <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > If possible pango should be used with gtk, since then a dependency on | > X will be avoided. (gtk/gtkmm exists for Win as well, right?) | > | > Also if pango is used directly it seems to be possible to do without | > freetype fonts. Is this the case with

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: | > > | > > You're too gracious. Cut'n paste with middle mouse button? | > | > Me? Certainly not. | > | > I don't think I've touched my mouse during the last four hours. | | What

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Why should it be true? We do not want to change the clipboard, do we? Ah yes, I reversed the meaning. Sorry. > Alfredo> (btw, we should make the cut/copy split as we have done in > Alfredo> Cut&Paste). > > What do you mean? To eliminate the realcut argument in fav

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: > > > > You're too gracious. Cut'n paste with middle mouse button? > > Me? Certainly not. > > I don't think I've touched my mouse during the last four hours. What I mean is that *I* have been seen doing that at times (blush,

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alfredo> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Alfredo> + void overwriteSelection(LyXText * lt) + { + if Alfredo> (lt->selection.set()) { + lt->update(); + Alfredo> lt->cutSelection(true, false); Alfredo> The second argument (realcut) should

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:23:51AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Question: why all the updates? Because not too many help on BRANCH_NOUPDATE. SCNR. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > You are all invited to the party! Seriously, I really have tried all and read > through the sources. I just have no explanation on this behaviour. It seems > that the return key behaves fundamentally different to any other key. I'm > lost. > +void overwri

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Huang Ying
> If possible pango should be used with gtk, since then a dependency on > X will be avoided. (gtk/gtkmm exists for Win as well, right?) > > Also if pango is used directly it seems to be possible to do without > freetype fonts. Is this the case with Xft? The problem about pango is that It is a high

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:35:24PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Indentation, but seemingly not your doing. > > You're too gracious. Cut'n paste with middle mouse button? Me? Certainly not. I don't think I've touched my mouse during the last four hours. Andre' -- Those who desire to give u

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly: > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:55:04AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > if (it->inset) { > > if (static_cast > > (it->inset)->lyxCode() == > > Inset::B

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | + // FIXME: WTF doesn't this work? > | + // overwriteSelection(bv->getLyXText()); > Find an answer to these questions and we might be able to party. You are all invited to the party! Seriously, I really have tried all and read through the so

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:55:04AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > if (it->inset) { > if (static_cast > (it->inset)->lyxCode() == > Inset::BRANCH_CODE) { This first static_cast is somewhere between superflous and wro

Re: gtk patch against 1.4.0cvs on July 1st.

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Huang Ying <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > o Why are we using Xft directly ? Doesn't gtk+ abstract the actual font | > loader away ? | I think the gtk+ render system(i.e. pango) is a rather high level | render system and they work efficient only on long text, such as a | paragraph. I have try i

Re: feature request: ERT lock

2003-07-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "larry" == larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: larry> At the moment, we use minipage to "protect" top-line, larry> intermediate and ending text for complex documents. larry> A straightforward example might be a letterhead with fixed larry> topline, addressing and closing elements. Certain po

Re: [PATCH] Branch/Note "final"

2003-07-08 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 12:42:22AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Attached is the "final" version of my Note/Branch inset work. It > | works, has a decent UI and is I think cleanly coded (in Pascal-style > | C++ :-). > | > | Of course

Re: patches

2003-07-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Spitzmueller) writes: | @@ -724,6 +734,8 @@ | break; | | bv->beforeChange(this); | + // FIXME: WTF doesn't this work? | + // overwriteSelection(bv->getLyXText()); | insertInset(new InsetNewline);

  1   2   >