XForms Version 1.0 RC5 released

It's at ftp://ncmir.ucsd.edu/pub/xforms/OpenSource/xforms-1.0RC5.tgz Rob.

Defect Handling Survey

Hello, I am conducting a survey about the way defects are handled in open source software projects. It is very easy to fill out. It consists of three short sections which can be completed at once or in different sessions. The survey can be found in the address: http://www.seas.smu.edu/~gkoru/su

Re: make rpmdist

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:11:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | fails here with: > > You are using srcdir != builddir? > > I am not sure that this will work... > > it seems that the spec file is not found at all... Yes, that's the problem

Re: mathed/ref_inset::dispatch question

> On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 04:16:45PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Ok. I re-read it. I still think the direction is ok. And as > > > the mis-understandings were resolved in the end > > > > Well since you like it, here's the incentive to start thinking > > about it a bit more. This probabl

Re: mathed/ref_inset::dispatch question

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 04:16:45PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Sigh. You might like the patch. Uh.. I see I forgot to move that LFUN handling to LyXText ;-) Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Re: Bug reading label with underscores + patch

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:47:39PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> Just commit. Looks ok. > > Done. Is there something to do with 1.3.0cvs? It seems to work for all cases I tried except for spaces nested in { }. Either {} or simple spaces work. I think the attached patch may fix all

Re: 1.3 release

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:51:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Yes, we don't need "full" qt support, but we need "complete" support. > > I.e. we cannot have some of the most important parts of the gui not > > working at all, but it is ok if the support is not super nice. > > Was "Christmas"

this file kills lyx2lyx

With yesterday's cvs, this file fauses lyx2lyx to roll over and die. -- Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of Xand postings. Penn

Re: 1.3 release

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:06:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Unfortunately, the Tabular dialog is different to every single > other dialog in that changes made to it are registered > immediately. Ie, there's no "Apply" or "Ok" button. > > The result is extremely complex code. Not in Qt.

Re: mathed/ref_inset::dispatch question

On Friday 27 September 2002 3:58 pm, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Friday 27 September 2002 3:16 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:19:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > It all seemed to make sense to me at the time, but I > > > thought I'd try and get a pipestream working fi

Re: mathed/ref_inset::dispatch question

On Friday 27 September 2002 3:16 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:19:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > It all seemed to make sense to me at the time, but I thought > > I'd try and get a pipestream working first. > > Ok. I re-read it. I still think the direction is ok. And a

New LyX layout available.

I have created a new LyX layout which supports the "IJMPD" document class (ws-ijmpd.cls), for submissions to the International journal of Modern Physics D (http://www.worldscinet.com/ijmpd). I have tested this new layout thoroughly, and it works quite well. Recently, I have submitted an article t

Re: mathed/ref_inset::dispatch question

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:27:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > No real reason given my biased perception. Mainly big surprise and the > fear that I break too much which just happens to work. Fear, uncertainty, > doubt, ... Yes, that's an accurate summation of my objections, at least (Gone ove

Re: mathed/ref_inset::dispatch question

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:19:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > It all seemed to make sense to me at the time, but I thought I'd > try and get a pipestream working first. Ok. I re-read it. I still think the direction is ok. And as the mis-understandings were resolved in the end Andre' --

Re: latex2html problems with equations

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 08:40:03AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Thursday 26 September 2002 8:04 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins > wrote: > For what it's worth, tth will export your equations as valid > html and word can import them... Ooh, that's nice. Someday I'll even get mozilla's fonts fi

Re: LyX meeting 2003

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | It looks like we really can have next year's LyX meeting in Chemnitz. > | So far we have been promised a place to put the machinery for "four or five | days" probably at a cost of 25 EUR per day for the whole lot. The place | could be used for rest for

Re: 1.3 release

On Friday 27 September 2002 1:54 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Nah. You get my vote as long as you keep moving... I've already volunteered to do the Label dialog... Angus

Re: 1.3 release

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:46:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> | (a) put 1.3 out without full Qt support >> >> Yes, we don't need "full" qt support, but we need "complete" support. >> I.e. we cannot have some of the most important parts of the

Re: 1.3 release

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:06:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > * Ed's working on the Document dialog. > > > * Nobody is working on the Preferences or Tabular dialogs. > > > > They both are big _and_ needed, aren't they? > > We should start with the Tabular dialog. People can always > modif

Re: 1.3 release

On Friday 27 September 2002 1:28 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:28:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > * Ed's working on the Document dialog. > > * Nobody is working on the Preferences or Tabular dialogs. > > They both are big _and_ needed, aren't they? We should start wit

Re: 1.3 release

> They both are big _and_ needed, aren't they? yes

Re: 1.3 release

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:28:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > * Ed's working on the Document dialog. > * Nobody is working on the Preferences or Tabular dialogs. They both are big _and_ needed, aren't they? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not ha

LyX meeting 2003

It looks like we really can have next year's LyX meeting in Chemnitz. So far we have been promised a place to put the machinery for "four or five days" probably at a cost of 25 EUR per day for the whole lot. The place could be used for rest for a few people, too. Maybe all if we do not insist on

Re: Xforms dialogs: can the text_warning area go?

On Friday 27 September 2002 11:59 am, R. Lahaye wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > On Friday 27 September 2002 4:13 am, R. Lahaye wrote: > >>Jürgen and others, > >> > >>Some time ago I posted my desire to remove the text_warning > >>areas in the Xforms > >> > >>dialogs. You (Jürgen) replied then th

Re: 1.3 release

> Was "Christmas" for "full" or "complete" support? John? complete, I would think. Unless people step in to implement the preferences and tabular dialogs.

Re: 1.3 release

On Friday 27 September 2002 12:46 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | I think there was no conclusion. > | > | John told us that he probably can't finish before Christmas, > | nobody was willing/able to help out and Lars said that > | Christmas is too lat

Re: mathed/ref_inset::dispatch question

On Friday 27 September 2002 12:27 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Note that (short of using the IMNSHO optimal solution of > > > "unified insets") this might be achievable by using lfun > > > dispatch to pop up the dialogs. But that w

Re: 1.3 release

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:46:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | (a) put 1.3 out without full Qt support > > Yes, we don't need "full" qt support, but we need "complete" support. > I.e. we cannot have some of the most important parts of the gui not > working at all, but it is ok if the su

Re: Xforms dialogs: can the text_warning area go?

R. Lahaye wrote: > OK - got it. I'll stop arguing. I would put in a smile on another day. > But, may I then suggest to change the font size of the message from > "FL_SMALL_SIZE" to "FL_NORMAL_SIZE"? Yes, shure. > The font is difficult to read, because it's in red. No idea who changed that. I

Re: 1.3 release

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I think there was no conclusion. > | John told us that he probably can't finish before Christmas, nobody was | willing/able to help out and Lars said that Christmas is too late. > | So how is this to be resolved? > | (a) put 1.3 out without full Qt sup

Re: Xforms dialogs: can the text_warning area go?

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > R. Lahaye wrote: > >>The space is always occupied by the (mostly void) text widget; and >>all it says (to the power user!) that the input is invalid. > > > No, it's a hint to the unexperienced user. We have disabled the input filter > for the power users, which mi

1.3 release

I think there was no conclusion. John told us that he probably can't finish before Christmas, nobody was willing/able to help out and Lars said that Christmas is too late. So how is this to be resolved? (a) put 1.3 out without full Qt support (b) revoke feature freeze and try again in November

Re: mathed/ref_inset::dispatch question

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Note that (short of using the IMNSHO optimal solution of > > "unified insets") this might be achievable by using lfun > > dispatch to pop up the dialogs. But that would probably mean a > > bit more work on the gui<->core interface

Re: possible feature - long shot but still..

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:37:39PM -0400, Nirmal Govind wrote: > Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm > Precedence: bulk > X-No-Archive: yes > List-Post: > List-Help: > List-Unsubscribe: > Delivered-T

Re: Xforms dialogs: can the text_warning area go?

R. Lahaye wrote: > The space is always occupied by the (mostly void) text widget; and > all it says (to the power user!) that the input is invalid. No, it's a hint to the unexperienced user. We have disabled the input filter for the power users, which might irritate the unexperienced user (see b

Re: mathed/ref_inset::dispatch question

On Friday 27 September 2002 11:52 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:59:12AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > André, > > > > I take it that this is commented out for now because > > RefInset derives from CommandInset rather than InsetCommand? > > // cmd.view()->owner()->getDialo

Re: Xforms dialogs: can the text_warning area go?

Angus Leeming wrote: > On Friday 27 September 2002 4:13 am, R. Lahaye wrote: > >>Jürgen and others, >> >>Some time ago I posted my desire to remove the text_warning >>areas in the Xforms >> >>dialogs. You (Jürgen) replied then that: >> >>>I have spent a lot of time in implementing this "power use

Re: mathed/ref_inset::dispatch question

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:59:12AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > André, > > I take it that this is commented out for now because RefInset > derives from CommandInset rather than InsetCommand? > // cmd.view()->owner()->getDialogs()->showRef(this); Yes. This is part of the "proof of c

mathed/ref_inset::dispatch question

André, I take it that this is commented out for now because RefInset derives from CommandInset rather than InsetCommand? // cmd.view()->owner()->getDialogs()->showRef(this); I ask because I had a go last night at turning John's rewrite of the label dialog into working code. It wo

Re: make rpmdist

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:11:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > You are using srcdir != builddir? Aah... Yes. I remember now that I had problem because of that last time I tried, too... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they d

Re: make rpmdist

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | fails here with: You are using srcdir != builddir? I am not sure that this will work... it seems that the spec file is not found at all... -- Lgb

make rpmdist

fails here with: find development -name \*CVS\*` ; \ rm -rf `find images -name \*CVS\*` make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx/lyx-build' find lyx-1.3.0cvs -type d ! -perm -777 -exec chmod a+rwx {} \; -o \ ! -type d ! -perm -444 -links 1 -exec chmod a+r {} \; -o \ ! -type d ! -perm -400 -

Re: [PATCH]: removing 1 more dependency

On Friday 27 September 2002 8:45 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Trivial patch attached. Ok to commit? > yes. Done. > | ps, shall I wait for someone to run my fix for leaking > | pixmap icons through valgrind or just commit it anyway. (It > | does w

Re: LaTeX expert advice (math) wanted!

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:02:25AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > may I dare to ask a TeX question in the lyx-devel list??? > > I would like to write something like > > c-use(x) > > in a math formula where "c-use" is the name of a function. If I enter a > "-" in mathed, LaTeX puts som

Re: LaTeX expert advice (math) wanted!

On Friday 27 September 2002 9:02 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > may I dare to ask a TeX question in the lyx-devel list??? > > I would like to write something like > > c-use(x) > > in a math formula where "c-use" is the name of a function. If > I enter a "-" in mathed, LaTeX puts som

Re: lyxpipe bug report WONTFIX?

On Thursday 26 September 2002 9:22 pm, Duncan Simpson wrote: > If LyX is following me and thinking that LyX should be using > anonymous pipes (multiple, at least one for input and one for > ouput) or a pair of connected sockets crreated by > socketpair(2) for remote connections then it is much sim

Re: Xforms dialogs: can the text_warning area go?

On Friday 27 September 2002 4:13 am, R. Lahaye wrote: > Jürgen and others, > > Some time ago I posted my desire to remove the text_warning > areas in the Xforms > > dialogs. You (Jürgen) replied then that: > > I have spent a lot of time in implementing this "power user" > > stuff (ability to enter

Re: Dialog code question: What does "bc().addReadOnly(FL_OBJECT *)" do?

On Friday 27 September 2002 7:36 am, R. Lahaye wrote: > Allan Rae wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Rob Lahaye wrote: > > [...] > > > >>Why does this function only work on check and button > >> widgets? When I do, for example: > >> > >> bc().addReadOnly(dialog_->choice_width_unit) > >> > >>the

Re: latex2html problems with equations

On Thursday 26 September 2002 8:04 pm, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > I'm coauthoring a paper that will ultimately be submitted in > word. There's no way that I'm going to use equation editor > until the final draft, though :) > > I'm trying to send the doc to html and use pngs for the > equatio

LaTeX expert advice (math) wanted!

Hi, may I dare to ask a TeX question in the lyx-devel list??? I would like to write something like c-use(x) in a math formula where "c-use" is the name of a function. If I enter a "-" in mathed, LaTeX puts some space around the hyphen. Does anybody know whether there is another "-" sig

Re: [PATCH]: removing 1 more dependency

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Trivial patch attached. Ok to commit? yes. | Angus > | ps, shall I wait for someone to run my fix for leaking pixmap | icons through valgrind or just commit it anyway. (It does work | and does cure a leak.) see if you can get someone to test it fir