On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Note that (short of using the IMNSHO optimal solution of > > "unified insets") this might be achievable by using lfun > > dispatch to pop up the dialogs. But that would probably mean a > > bit more work on the gui<->core interface to avoid direct > > pointers/references and use lfuns for communication instead. > > Indeed. Did you see my suggestion for how that should be > achieved ;-)
Probably yes, but I can't remember it. Is it in the archives? > Now I see why you were on my side from the start; > you actually understood what I was talking about. Maybe. But I am always a bit slow to take up ideas from others... > Incidentally, I don' remember you being voted down. I remember > you swamping slow moving tortoises with too much too soon ;-) Well... > I guess that inset-unification would also lead to a single label > inset as a clickable button rather than the current nastiness. > Should you decide to put IU forward again, you may count on my > vote ;-) Fine. I think I'll try again in the 1.4 cycle. > Incidentally, what were the reasons that people put forward > against IU? No real reason given my biased perception. Mainly big surprise and the fear that I break too much which just happens to work. Fear, uncertainty, doubt, ... > It appears that today is a smiley day ater all. Maybe. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
