On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:51:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Yes, we don't need "full" qt support, but we need "complete" support.
> > I.e. we cannot have some of the most important parts of the gui not
> > working at all, but it is ok if the support is not super nice.
>
> Was "Christmas" for "full" or "complete" support? John?
"Complete" support will take years.
I meant to reach a point where we can release something. I'm being
realistics - who is going to look at, for example, the totally fubared
accent code on Qt ? Who knows how to solve the font problems that bother
Lars ? etc.
> But there is no list?
ARgghghg ! Bugzilla !!
john
--
"When your name is Winner, that's it. You don't need a nickname."
- Loser Lane
