On Wed, 29 May 2002, Stephan Witt wrote:
[...]
> > | Now that libsigc++ is more wide spread (ie. when it was included few
> > | major distros had a useful version of it) I want to remove it from the
> > | dist -- whether we require it for all signals or just for the gtk
> > | stuff.
> >
> > It see
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 09:07:19AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> You have that now... but with validation taking precedence. Do you really
> want to reverse that (i.e. the button taking precedence)? Be careful what
> you wish for.
[Yes. Because validation happens behind a user's back and can dec
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 06:56:50AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 08:13:38PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > "Suppress AMS" on "Suppress AMS" off
> > "Use AMS" on - +
> > "Use AMS" off - (Valid
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 07:39:39PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Why not ... on the subject of controversial upgrades, I think we should
> drop all support for xforms pre-1.0 in 1.3
Is 1.0 out?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they des
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 07:20:12PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | (but with automake 1.5 and not 1.6)
>
> Have you also forgotten that we just came out of a code freeze?
Oh... so the freeze is over?
Haven't seen an announcement lately ;-}
A
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 08:13:38PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> "Suppress AMS" on "Suppress AMS" off
> "Use AMS" on - +
> "Use AMS" off - (Validation result)
>
> Neither switch is a no-op. Does this make sense?
No,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 08:10:15PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> But at least disable the "Add row" menu item when the cursor is in inline
> math formula (and other items which are irrelevant: add column, alignment,
> etc.)
Done.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Secu
On 3 Jun 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rod> Herbert had the newer version of the one I had, and his looked
> Rod> fine. If Herbert can't find it, I have a copy of his version
> Rod> which I should be able to dig up. I haven't had a c
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Niklaus Giger wrote:
> As I have a german language setting, e.g. LANG=de_CH. I get
> the following errors:
> >In AddtoFolder [tabfolder.c 320] No space left for folder
> >Diverses
> >In AddtoFolder [tabfolder.c 320] No space left for folder
> >CJK Fonts
> I find nowhere i t
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 11:48:58AM +1200, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> What is required to get it working with other versions? libglade's CVS
> requires 2.53 so a few gnome users will be using it?
I think JMarc had 2.52 working at some point ...
And Lars was mumbling about this today, so I supp
>
>Bad:
>
>automake-1.4*
>automake-1.6*
>autoconf-2.5*
>
>Good:
>
>automake-1.5
>autoconf-2.13
What is required to get it working with other versions? libglade's CVS
requires 2.53 so a few gnome users will be using it?
Cheers
Koz
"Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who u
Hey guys,
lately I've been noticing a few 'mass actions' in bugzilla. i.e add JMarc
to CC for all 1.2.x bugs. etc.
If you want something like that done, just e-mail me as I can run a few SQL
statements and it's done. It saves your time, and my poor little MTA :)
Cheers
Koz
"Technology is
Am Samstag, 1. Juni 2002 03.33 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hello,
>
> One of CJK-LyX users has reported that CJK-LyX cannot
> read and save the "register mark" (the roman character
> "R" inside the circle). The problem is more than that.
> Read the following forwarded messages. I'm clueless at
>
I am having problems building LyX on Cygwin with the latest
CVS sources. The GNU autotools are generating bad configure
scripts, many unknown macros, etc.
Which versions of the GNU autotools are known to work (and
which versions are guaranteed to not work)?
Thanks.
---Ka
When comipiling (not linking) a file with ca. 30 signals with three
different gcc compilers.
[larsbj@trylle test]$ ls -l signals*
-rw-rw-r--1 larsbj larsbj 683488 Jun 3 23:23 signals-2.96
-rw-rw-r--1 larsbj larsbj 478456 Jun 3 23:22 signals-3.1
-rw-rw-r--1 larsbj lars
Am Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2002 03.18 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hello,
>
> We are relieved to have it official the CJK-LyX-1.2.0 at
> the ftp site, ftp://stone.phys.pusan.ac.kr/pub/CJK-LyX
Thank you very much for your great work.
I compiled CJK-LyX 1.2 on my Debian GNU/Linux system.
On startup I
Dear LyX developers:
Congratulations on 1.2. It is excellent.
I have been holding off on two small bugs to see if they
were being handled in the new release. And one is still
crawling around so I'll mention it here:
Underlined words are still treated as a single word and can
run off the page
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:28:12PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> John, you made reference to this, but where is it? Or does RC work now
> with 1.2.1?
Re-download the tarball with the same name.
Better to wait a bit for RC3 though, so that arrow keys work ...
john
--
"Do you mean to tell me
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 07:42:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | Have you also forgotten that we just came out of a code freeze?
>>
>> btw. Should be change to automake 1.6 and autoconf 2.53 now?
>
| Why not ... on the subject of controversial
lyx --frontend xforms
lyx --frontend qt
lyx --frontend gnome
without recompiles.
This is actually easier than you might think.
We need a clear API into the frontends, much like the signal setup
today, but in the opposite direction.
This also means that using boost::function or boost::signal i
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 07:42:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Have you also forgotten that we just came out of a code freeze?
>
> btw. Should be change to automake 1.6 and autoconf 2.53 now?
Why not ... on the subject of controversial upgrades, I think we should
drop all support for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | (but with automake 1.5 and not 1.6)
>
| Have you also forgotten that we just came out of a code freeze?
btw. Should be change to automake 1.6 and autoconf 2.53 now?
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (but with automake 1.5 and not 1.6)
Have you also forgotten that we just came out of a code freeze?
--
Lgb
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 06:04:20PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:51:05PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > I would indeed rather inconvenience a few smart people to doing that,
> > than have a lot of not-so-smart people curse LyX for mysteriously refusing
> > to produ
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:30:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Since nobody complained[1] for three days, I'll commit the math parser
> changes. As I said: Cleaner code, 165 lines gone, but there might be
> problems as the change was fairly fundamental.
>
> Andre'
>
> PS: I know that we've
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:51:05PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I would indeed rather inconvenience a few smart people to doing that,
> than have a lot of not-so-smart people curse LyX for mysteriously refusing
> to produce legal LaTeX.
> So, by all means put in the option of suppressing the
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:27:35AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Um, "AMS user detection" goes wrong a lot more easily. Trust me, I know
> > users :-)
> >
> > I think auto-detection is a definite must. That, or always include A
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> It means that these functions were found (no error). With 0.
>> (and 0.89.x) there is no need for -lflimage here.
John> And that is what is odd. Since I
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:20:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John> wrote:
>> www.boost.org has all the information that you need.
John> Ha !
>> | Well I've no real idea what you're on about (why would things
>> stop | working now, wh
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It means that these functions were found (no error). With 0. (and
> 0.89.x) there is no need for -lflimage here.
And that is what is odd. Since I was linking in -lflimage, how did it
succeed ?
john
--
"Do you mean to
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:20:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> www.boost.org has all the information that you need.
Ha !
> | Well I've no real idea what you're on about (why would things stop
> | working now, when they worked previously ?
>
> Previously when?
with libsigc++. Print wor
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:13:25PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> it seems a bit complicated to me... Did you investigate macros like
>> AC_SEARCH_LIBS or AC_CHECK_LIB? They seem to be useful in this
>> case.
John> If ther
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 02:19:48PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | Normally what I'd do is go read the failing code, and understand the
>> | root cause, but then I looked at bind.hpp - and I'm with JMarc on this
>> | one ... WOW
>>
>> Wrong solut
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:13:25PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> it seems a bit complicated to me... Did you investigate macros like
> AC_SEARCH_LIBS or AC_CHECK_LIB? They seem to be useful in this case.
If there's one thing I've learnt about autoconf it's DON'T TOUCH ANYTHING
I have rea
Hi,
when running "chktex" on TeX code generated by Lyx, the parenthesis
rules for plain text are also applied to Code, which is wrong.
E.g., "main()" will result in a warning that no space precedes the "(".
Lyx should convert TeX code which does not produce such warnings or
suppress such warnings
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 02:13:46PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lflimage collect2: ld returned 1 exit
>> status
John> Actually can I have your config.log ? I don't understand how it
John> found
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 02:19:48PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Normally what I'd do is go read the failing code, and understand the
> | root cause, but then I looked at bind.hpp - and I'm with JMarc on this
> | one ... WOW
>
> Wrong solution then... expect our own code to be at fault f
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:59:56AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 02:08:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> - In the "Math Delimiters" dialog, selecting a different delimiter
> > >> resul
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 10:27:50AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | boost::function0::operator() () const [with
>> | R = void, Policy = boost::empty_function_policy, Mixin =
>> | boost::empty_function_mixin, Allocator =
>> | allocator]: Assertion `
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:18:48PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I have in my local tree a 'fix' that prints a warning pop-up when
> encountering this. At a minimum, this -- and the way out of it -- should
> be documented somewhere.
Yes, probably ... there's also a bug open on not allowing this
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 12:38:14PM +0200, Cyrille Artho wrote:
> Hi,
> when trying to import a document which has been written a year ago (with
> 1.1.6), I get errors in three places with floating figures and tables.
> The reason is that the Lyx paragraph layout is incorrectly imported as
> "Des
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 10:23:37AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Well, it exists only on RedHat linux.
>
| Your point being ?
>
| This "2.96 doesn't exist" crap has always irritated me, even when it was
| so broken as to be unusable ...
I have no
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 02:13:46PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lflimage
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Actually can I have your config.log ?
I don't understand how it found the image loader at all
john
--
"Do you mean to tell me that "The Prince"
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 02:13:46PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I tried to build 1.2.1cvs with xforms 0. (but the problem will be
> the same with 0.89). The link dies with
>
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lflimage
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Urrgh, will fix.
john
--
"Do yo
I tried to build 1.2.1cvs with xforms 0. (but the problem will be
the same with 0.89). The link dies with
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lflimage
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Indeed, there is no libflimage here. I do not have time to fix it now,
but the code in xforms.m4 should not try to
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 12:38:14PM +0200, Cyrille Artho wrote:
> Unfortunately the document is far too big to server as an example for
> this bug.
Can you cut it down to just the relevant bits then (in 1.1.6) and send
that ?
thanks
john
--
"Do you mean to tell me that "The Prince" is not the
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 10:27:50AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | boost::function0::operator() () const [with
> | R = void, Policy = boost::empty_function_policy, Mixin =
> | boost::empty_function_mixin, Allocator =
> | allocator]: Assertion `!this->empty()' failed.
>
> With two seconds o
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 10:23:37AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Well, it exists only on RedHat linux.
Your point being ?
This "2.96 doesn't exist" crap has always irritated me, even when it was
so broken as to be unusable ...
john
--
"Do you mean to tell me that "The Prince" is not th
On Monday 03 June 2002 4:55 am, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> as I work through the process of implementing dialogs for the GNOME
> frontend I'm bound to come accross things that don't quite make sense
> to me, hopefully my questioning won't be *too* annoying.
>
> The first such confus
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:55:38AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Trying to fix the discovered problem is certainly a valid option, but you
>> | are not too eager to do so if that means "not so nice/modern/whatever"
>> | code.
>>
>> I have limi
Hi,
when trying to import a document which has been written a year ago (with
1.1.6), I get errors in three places with floating figures and tables.
The reason is that the Lyx paragraph layout is incorrectly imported as
"Description" rather than "Standard", which causes certain conflicts in
the LaT
Hi,
when I open a document containing images, the scroll bar is set
initially to a certain size. I then scroll down (dragging the scroll
bar) to the end while the pictures are still loading. While scrolling,
the scroll bar behaves very strange, it sort of "jitters" along the way,
sometimes scrolli
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:55:38AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Trying to fix the discovered problem is certainly a valid option, but you
> | are not too eager to do so if that means "not so nice/modern/whatever"
> | code.
>
> I have limited time
Yes, but I thought there was some ki
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:15:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> No, but I want be over cautious and never try new things out of fear
>> of using too much memory, breaking compiles, etc.
>
| I think there is a fairly safe middle ground between "c
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:36:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | No, but I want be over cautious and never try new things out of fear
>^
>do not
I understood that.
[Well, I thought it was meant a bit ironically and you meant the opposite
of what you were writing
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| And mandrake linux.
Lars> which is just a patch upon...
It used to be, but this is less and less true.
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:50:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> | What's this?
>>> | Has it to do with the "binary unbloat"? (I have 17 GB free disk
>>> | space).
>>>
>>> No, rather with to
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:15:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No, but I want be over cautious and never try new things out of fear
> of using too much memory, breaking compiles, etc.
I think there is a fairly safe middle ground between "conservatism" (a la
Tcl/Tk-core changes) and the wa
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> | On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:24:42AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>
After all gcc 2.96 was never really released a
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Um, "AMS user detection" goes wrong a lot more easily. Trust me, I know
> users :-)
>
> I think auto-detection is a definite must. That, or always include AMS
> (the price is small), *and* don't allow the user to accidentally turn
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:50:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | What's this?
>> | Has it to do with the "binary unbloat"? (I have 17 GB free disk
>> | space).
>>
>> No, rather with too little swap memory.
>> (too little total memory)
>
| Comp
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 07:02:27AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Herbert already has a dialog for doing this, no ?
>
> For doing what? For deciding when "AMS auto detection" went wrong?
>
> Andre'
Um, "AMS user detection" goes wrong a lot more easily. Trust me, I know
users :-)
I think aut
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 02:08:55PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> - In the "Math Delimiters" dialog, selecting a different delimiter
> >> results in a redraw problem (the field above the list of available
> >> delimiters
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:57:02PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:31:43PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> >
> > > > I do not get "{ {" but something else ...
> > > Shoudn't you get "{ }"? Why would you expect "{ {"
> >
> > Selecting both :
>
The email is in my in tray, I should get to it in the next few days.
Rod
On 3 Jun 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rod> Herbert had the newer version of the one I had, and his looked
> Rod> fine. If Herbert can't find it, I have a co
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:24:42AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>> After all gcc 2.96 was never really released at all... (send a bug
>>> report to RedHat) As such... gcc
> "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rod> Herbert had the newer version of the one I had, and his looked
Rod> fine. If Herbert can't find it, I have a copy of his version
Rod> which I should be able to dig up. I haven't had a chance yet to
Rod> look at the contribution from Matthe
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| New doc
| Control-P
>
| lyx: ../boost/boost/function/function_template.hpp:294: R
| boost::function0::operator() () const [with
| R = void, Policy = boost::empty_function_policy, Mixin =
| boost::empty_function_mixin, Allocator =
| allocator]: Assertion `!
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:24:42AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> After all gcc 2.96 was never really released at all...
>> (send a bug report to RedHat)
>> As such... gcc 2.96 is probably the worst compiler to be used for any
>> comparisons.
>
| W
Found it. This is the latest version I have. Given that Elsevier will
probably retype a latex article anyway, as far as I can tell from
comp.text.tex, this version is close enough.
It certainly produced a working elseveir preprint when I had a look.
Rod
_
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I would prefer "Source listing ..." (note the ellipsis) I'm also
>> not happy about the extension of a menu that is too large already,
>> but I don't have a good suggestion for that yet. Certainly it does
>> not deserve its own sectio
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:50:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | What's this?
> | Has it to do with the "binary unbloat"? (I have 17 GB free disk
> | space).
>
> No, rather with too little swap memory.
> (too little total memory)
Compiling "on disk" is not an option at all.
I think we (
Herbert had the newer version of the one I had, and his looked fine. If
Herbert can't find it, I have a copy of his version which I should be able
to dig up. I haven't had a chance yet to look at the contribution from
Matthew, so I can't comment.
Rod
On 3 Jun 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 06:25:16PM +1000, matthew arnison wrote:
>> I have made up a basic LyX layout file and template to support the
>> Elsevier preprint class (elsart.cls). They're online at
>> http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~matthew
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Spitzmueller) writes:
| What's this?
| Has it to do with the "binary unbloat"? (I have 17 GB free disk
| space).
No, rather with too little swap memory.
(too little total memory)
--
Lgb
Since nobody complained[1] for three days, I'll commit the math parser
changes. As I said: Cleaner code, 165 lines gone, but there might be
problems as the change was fairly fundamental.
Andre'
PS: I know that we've not reached consensus about the handling of
$...\\...$. But since I think that
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:42:29AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> No, completely unrelated.
>
> And do you have plans for this one?
I am looking into it...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T.
77 matches
Mail list logo
