Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:50:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | What's this?
>> | Has it to do with the "binary unbloat"? (I have 17 GB free disk
>> | space).
>>
>> No, rather with too little swap memory.
>> (too little total memory)
>
| Compiling "on disk" is not an option at all.
>
| I think we (in other words _you_) have to think again about memory usage.
| Now. We can't require the latest compiler on the latest hardware (but
| with automake 1.5 and not 1.6) just to compile LyX.
>
| If this means we can't use some nice feature or two, well, that's the price
| for having content users and developpers. If you move on on the path you've
| obviously chosen you'll be the only one working on LyX at some point of
| time. Is that what you want?
No, but I want be over cautious and never try new things out of fear
of using too much memory, breaking compiles, etc.
I will also not revert all such changes immidiatly without exploring
the possibilities of fixing the discovered problems first.
--
Lgb
