[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 04:50:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> | What's this?
>>> | Has it to do with the "binary unbloat"? (I have 17 GB free disk
>>> | space).
>>>
>>> No, rather with too little swap memory.
>>> (too little total memory)
>>
| | Compiling "on disk" is not an option at all.
>>
| | I think we (in other words _you_) have to think again about memory usage.
| | Now. We can't require the latest compiler on the latest hardware (but
| | with automake 1.5 and not 1.6) just to compile LyX.
>>
| | If this means we can't use some nice feature or two, well, that's the price
| | for having content users and developpers. If you move on on the path you've
| | obviously chosen you'll be the only one working on LyX at some point of
| | time. Is that what you want?
>
| No, but I want be over cautious and never try new things out of fear
^
do not
--
Lgb
