On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 09:07:19AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> You have that now... but with validation taking precedence. Do you really
> want to reverse that (i.e. the button taking precedence)? Be careful what
> you wish for.

[Yes. Because validation happens behind a user's back and can decide to use
AMS even if he explicitly disabled it. That's broken. But: ...]

> Then you may want to consider radio buttons:
> 
>       < > "Use AMS"
>       < > "Don't use AMS"
>       <x> "Let LyX decide"

... _that_ might indeed be an option. Would that be difficult to implement?

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Reply via email to