On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:55:38AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Trying to fix the discovered problem is certainly a valid option, but you > | are not too eager to do so if that means "not so nice/modern/whatever" > | code. > > I have limited time....
Yes, but I thought there was some kind of unwritten agreement that everybody tries to clean up his own mess. [And no, I am certainly not without fault in this area...] > | As an example I'd like to point out the problem of too much > | dependencies. Changing a few enums to ints or anything else > | forward-declarable would help much but this has not be done. For years I > | might add. > > and it certainly is not a nice solution... Indeed. But we have to weigh "nice" against "works". And neither scaling factor should be infinite... > And we have some of what you did. I know. I am fairly happy with it. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
