* Garst R. Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010610 08:11]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > The bottom line is that, by the time this GUII path of development
> >
> > So why exactly should we slow the development of Unix LyX to a crawl
> > to chase a wild goose?
> Try: because it's fun.
> becau
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 04:27:49PM +1200, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> 4) Add Web Frontend to database allowing logged in users to add news.
why would we want this ? What is the failing with current CVS based system ?
> 5) Start poking about in src/frontends/gnome again.
yeah, definitely !
despite my eariler claim, it was the KDE removal patch causing the problem.
It clashes with Lars' changing AM_PROG_LIBTOOL to AC_PROG_LIBTOOL. Lars,
why did you change this ? Can it be changed back ?
thanks
john
--
"Someone turn off the good idea tap; we're drowning here!"
- Rusty Russ
Over the next few weeks I'll try to do these tasks for LyX. As far as
I can tell they all need doing, any comments?
1) Move all images from www-user and www-devel into a /images
directory and adjust all tags accordingly.
2) Remove any remaining tags
2.5) Add CSS for all formatting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The bottom line is that, by the time this GUII path of development
>
> So why exactly should we slow the development of Unix LyX to a crawl
> to chase a wild goose?
Try: because it's fun.
because it's interesting.
because the bottom line is too boring.
> - Forwarded message from Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Now imagine having LyX on Windows. All these people would be happy and
> there is quite a few of them. Add to that group potential users from non
> scientific community, say writers, who want to have a nice interface fo
I forgot to CC to list. Here it is.
- Forwarded message from Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 17:13:48 -0400
From: Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: when lyx say bye bye to xforms?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMA
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 10:00:01PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > this is just totally stupid and a waste of everyone's time.
>
> what is? ;-)
going over the same old ground again ;)
> > unless someone actually steps up with some actual code that is.
>
> I am afraid that this discussion will
> I would prefer Allan to work on lyx/bufferview GUIIsation too, but you
> can't force him to do so.
me to, but that wasn't *exactly* my point.
> this is just totally stupid and a waste of everyone's time.
what is? ;-)
> can't we just drop it ? please ?
> unless someone actually steps up with
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:35:23PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> decision. We don't want to talk about it any more. In fact, our
> emailcontroller does not support this mode of conversation. But we are
> working on it...it will be there...one day...for sure...
edwin, as a bona fide developer, y
Larry is of course completely wrong. It's quite obvious: qt is an easy to
use, gpl'ed, c++ widget set with a dialog designer, localisation tool, xml
libraries, sophisticated table widgets, slots and signals, etc. It would be
completely outrageous to replace xforms with qt. We've got a much bett
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 09:49:16PM +0300, Baruch Even wrote:
> Well, the developers seem to be holding the opinion that GUI
> independence is a good idea, and since we hold the steering wheel, we
> have the last say. I don't mean it in the dictatorial way ...
At least you have offered some amus
i reported this some time ago!
- open a new doc with class article and rest default;
- insert a float with a figure and any caption
- run dvi-view
and you'll get errors, because lyx don't write the
command \usepackage{graphic} in the tex-output.
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~vos
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010609 21:22]:
> Some of us recall wistfully the adaption of a 1.0 vintage LyX from
> xforms to QT in "a week" (or some other ridiculously short period of
> time, was the claim) by one of the original core developers and, if I
> recall correctly, one other
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 06:56:53PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> > I can't help but wonder whether GUI "independence" is a worthwhile
> > goal, verses the selection of an alternative toolkit, warts and all.
>
> I suggest you go back, and read approximately 3-4000 messages on this topic.
> I'm not
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 10:48:02AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Some of us recall wistfully the adaption of a 1.0 vintage LyX from
> xforms to QT in "a week" (or some other ridiculously short period of
> time, was the claim) by one of the original core developers and, if I
> recall correctly
Some of us recall wistfully the adaption of a 1.0 vintage LyX from
xforms to QT in "a week" (or some other ridiculously short period of
time, was the claim) by one of the original core developers and, if I
recall correctly, one other gentleman.
I can't help but wonder whether GUI "independence" i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have for some time used LyX on my SuSE PPC box. Now i am upgrading my
> other mac for os x and wonder if there is any binaries available for os x.
> I can run a lot of gnu software using xfree4.1 on mac os x, so what about
> LyX?
>
> Regards Gunnar A
have a look a
Hi
I have for some time used LyX on my SuSE PPC box. Now i am upgrading my
other mac for os x and wonder if there is any binaries available for os x.
I can run a lot of gnu software using xfree4.1 on mac os x, so what about
LyX?
Regards Gunnar A
Pairs of double quotes curl in different directions but single quotes
don't. It doesn't look correct.
Your bug number 19 seems to indicate the problem (I think):
19. LyX sometimes gets caught by TeX fonts ligatures: for example, in
the sentence "He said 'Hello!'", the single and double closing q
* Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-06-08 18:02] schrieb:
> > "Ronny" == Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ronny> * Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ronny> [2001-06-06 16:57] schrieb:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Appended as usual is a list of what has been fixe
21 matches
Mail list logo
