On 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Also remember that most of the arguments to lyxfuncs are strings,
> (actually to few of the lyxfuncs take arguments...)
That's only true because that's all that was able to be passed.
Everything else required calling some global function until we in
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Am I right in saying that together they effectively give us the functionality
> > of XTL? Or am I getting excited and being stupid at the same time?
>
> No, that's basically what XTL would do - at least in this place.
>
> And the idea to use string
On 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > | Am I right in saying that together they effectively give us the
> | > | functionality of XTL? Or am
On 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> | > > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > Lars> You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of
>
On 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Lars> You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of
> | Lars> the function?
> |
> | I'm not sure what I
Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
> > I finally found menus.bind in the Interface section of FormPreferences.
> > I was looking under Inputs.
>
> That'd be "Look & Feel"->"Interface".
>
>
> "Look&Feel" is for control of colours (eventually
Here's another small patch.
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc.| Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena
http://www.successlinks.com/kayvan | Reach your goals now! | Robin Gregory
Index: src/frontends/support/Ma
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> I finally found menus.bind in the Interface section of FormPreferences.
> I was looking under Inputs.
That'd be "Look & Feel"->"Interface".
"Look&Feel" is for control of colours (eventually), screen fonts, key
bindings and hand
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Ouch! Clicking on an existing reference should launch the mini reference
> > dialog and so give the ability to navigate between them, but John's right
> > IMO; you shouldn't be able to launch the full refe
On 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Marko" == Marko Vendelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Marko is there any particular reason for using NULL instead of 0 in
> >> a lot of your code? Is this a gnome convention? Where is it
> >> defined?
>
> Marko> I am just used to call N
I finally found menus.bind in the Interface section of FormPreferences.
I was looking under Inputs.
I still do not understand why FormPreferences chose menus.bind. It is
not the last include in my cua.bind.
Garst
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lior Silberman wrote:
> Int 1.1.5, the shortcut for "Insert->Figure" was M-i g and for
> "Insert->Footnote" it was M-i f. In the current menu defs, the Figure
> entry also has an 'F', overriding the 'footnote'.
>
> Since there is no 'o' in this menu so far, I think we should
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I tried to add to the CREDITS file all people which name appears in
> the ChangeLog and who were not mentionned. Of course I made mistakes.
> Of course I forgot people.
>
> Fell free to look it up and complain to me (but only on fridays).
>
> JMarc
Garst R. Reese
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Alvaro Tejero Cantero wrote:
> El vie, 13 oct 2000 escribías:
> | On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Alvaro Tejero Cantero wrote:
> | > Hello,
> | >
>
>
> Thank you: it worked, but the problem is now that 1.1.6 doesn't seem
> to recognize my LANG environment variable, so it doesn't star
After insertion/deletion of a char, in LyXText::InsertChar/BackSpace,
BreakAgainOneRow() is called in order to break the current row
(so the cursor can be positioned correctly), and then need_break_row is set
to the next row, and afterwards, in FullRebreak, there is a call to
BreakAgain(bview, ne
Lior Silberman wrote:
>
> Int 1.1.5, the shortcut for "Insert->Figure" was M-i g and for
> "Insert->Footnote" it was M-i f. In the current menu defs, the Figure
> entry also has an 'F', overriding the 'footnote'.
>
> Since there is no 'o' in this menu so far, I think we should choose one
> of:
>
Int 1.1.5, the shortcut for "Insert->Figure" was M-i g and for
"Insert->Footnote" it was M-i f. In the current menu defs, the Figure
entry also has an 'F', overriding the 'footnote'.
Since there is no 'o' in this menu so far, I think we should choose one
of:
f - Footnote / g - Figure
o - Footnot
On 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Jose> According to mine: man 3 printf
> |
> | Jose> The fprintf, printf, sprintf, vprintf, vfprintf, and vspr
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 07:14:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > ** Bugfixes
> >
> > - remove temporary directories when LyX crashes.
>
> I think you refer here to one of my patches, but this patch removes the
> temporary directory when using "l
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 11:12:05AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dekel> Other things for 1.1.5fix2:
>
> Dekel> - My cursor movement patch (I need to check it).
>
> OK
Here is the patch (for 1.1.5).
patch2.gz
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 05:06:27PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 14-Sep-2000 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > Juergen, what was wrong in the code you disabled at text.C (GetColumnNearX) ?
> > (near the "#warning This is wrong, please have a look Dekel ")
>
> Well I deactivated that when working on the te
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > The attached patch removes those "conversion to integral type of smaller
> size" warnings from a couple of files in frontends/xforms. This directory
> is now clean!
>
> A
Oops! Forgot to include combox.[Ch] in that patch.
Index: src/combox.C
===
The attached patch removes those "conversion to integral type of smaller
size" warnings from a couple of files in frontends/xforms. This directory is
now clean!
A
patchFri13Part4.bz2
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> One other idea togeter with this is to have all the lyxfuncs
| Lars> dynamically loadable...
|
| Or have a proper script language which does that for us?
That is also po
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of the
| > function?
| >
| > dispatch(..)
| > string string_arg
| > char char_arg;
| > ..
| > if (lyxaction.func(LFUN_BUFFER_NEW).arg1 == type_info)
| > string_arg
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> One other idea togeter with this is to have all the lyxfuncs
Lars> dynamically loadable...
Or have a proper script language which does that for us?
JMarc
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| > > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > Lars> You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of
| > Lars> the function?
| >
| > I'm not sure what I mean
>
> You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of the
> function?
>
> dispatch(..)
> string string_arg
> char char_arg;
> ..
> if (lyxaction.func(LFUN_BUFFER_NEW).arg1 == type_info)
> string_arg = stream_castfuncslot[1]
> .
>
> unless you have a bette
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of
| Lars> the function?
|
| I'm not sure what I mean exactly, but we could declare the arguments
| of the f
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of
> Lars> the function?
>
> I'm not sure what I mean exactly, but we could declare the arguments
> of the func
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Am I right in saying that together they effectively give us the functionality
| > of XTL? Or am I getting excited and being stupid at the same time?
|
| No, that's basically what XTL would do - at least in this place.
|
| And the idea to use string
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> this one should be OK
Yes, it seems. Applied.
JMarc
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of
Lars> the function?
I'm not sure what I mean exactly, but we could declare the arguments
of the function so that there type can be checked by dispatch, and the
t
this one should be OK
thanks
john
--
"Penguins are so sensitive to my needs."
- Lyle Lovett
? copyrightqtarch.diff
? copyright.tar.gz
? .libs
? new
? printbrowse.diff
? src/frontends/kde/allan.diff
Index: ChangeLog
=
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> What do we need it for?
|
| Lars> Ok, we can get a bit better error reporting but thats about it.
|
| Isn't it better than testing all argument in each case LFUN_xxx?
Y
> Am I right in saying that together they effectively give us the functionality
> of XTL? Or am I getting excited and being stupid at the same time?
No, that's basically what XTL would do - at least in this place.
And the idea to use strings in these places is not really new, either.
IIRC the l
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Heh, this patch is
John> really just an attempt to force someone into giving us GUII
John> people write access to www-devel (hint, hint)
At least, I applied it, so this attempt has not been totally vain.
JMarc
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ouch! Clicking on an existing reference should launch the mini reference
> dialog and so give the ability to navigate between them, but John's right
> IMO; you shouldn't be able to launch the full reference dialog (with its list
> of references etc)
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Why not FORCE people to put in their own name by making it
Angus> impossible to apply the entry until a valid name is input. Same
Angus> philosophy as the new FormDocument etc stuff.
Beacuse you do not even need to see a popup to
Heh, this patch is really just an attempt to force someone into
giving us GUII people write access to www-devel (hint, hint)
;)
thanks
john
--
"Penguins are so sensitive to my needs."
- Lyle Lovett
? printstatus.diff
Index: ChangeLog
=
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Am I right in saying that together they effectively give us the
| > | functionality of XTL? Or am I getting excited and being stupid at the
| > | same ti
> John> 1) with ro documents, Insert->Cross Reference is still
> John> selectable
>
> Because you can do Goto Reference, maybe.
Ouch! Clicking on an existing reference should launch the mini reference
dialog and so give the ability to navigate between them, but John's right
IMO; you shouldn't b
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> ah right. I can re-diff the other one if you want (obviously I
John> will have to wait for anoncvs to catch up ...)
Yes, I'd prefer that rather than aplying the patch by hand and
breaking it. I'll apply the first one right now.
JMarc
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> What do we need it for?
Lars> Ok, we can get a bit better error reporting but thats about it.
Isn't it better than testing all argument in each case LFUN_xxx?
JMarc
On 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> Small patches to let
> John> KDE (and hopefully Gnome, but untested) build again, and also
> John> some readonly stuff for the KDE dialogs.
>
> Applied.
>
ah right. I can re-diff the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
| Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
| Lars> Lars> We should make a way to ensure
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Am I right in saying that together they effectively give us the
> | functionality of XTL? Or am I getting excited and being stupid at the
> | same time?
>
> Yes, I think they do. (at least in this conte
On 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> Also re-gens the
> John> dialog files so the dialog can't be resized infinitely small ;)
>
> Hmm, patch says:
>
> fantomas[ssh]: patch -p0 <~/printbrowse.diff
> patching file ChangeL
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
Lars> Lars> We should make a way to ensure that LyXFunc are called
Lars> with the | Lars> correct numb
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Am I right in saying that together they effectively give us the functionality
| of XTL? Or am I getting excited and being stupid at the same time?
Yes, I think they do. (at least in this context)
Lgb
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | A little hack to add that vsnprintf stuff and yipeee! A working LyX at
| > | last.
| >
| > I just added my own hack... how does your hack work?
|
| You
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> We should make a way to ensure that LyXFunc are called with the
| Lars> correct number of arguments and also that the arguments are of
| Lars> the correct type. I think I
Am I right in saying that together they effectively give us the functionality
of XTL? Or am I getting excited and being stupid at the same time?
A
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Small patches to let
John> KDE (and hopefully Gnome, but untested) build again, and also
John> some readonly stuff for the KDE dialogs.
Applied.
John> Two small bugs (?) I noticed :
John> 1) with ro documents, Insert->Cross Reference
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Also re-gens the
John> dialog files so the dialog can't be resized infinitely small ;)
Hmm, patch says:
fantomas[ssh]: patch -p0 <~/printbrowse.diff
patching file ChangeLog
patch: malformed patch at line 17: diff -u -r1.1 formpr
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> I want to convert a string to int:
|
| Lars> int a = stream_cast("123");
|
| Lars> or a int to string:
|
| Lars> string a = stream_cast(123);
|
| This looks interestin
Also re-gens the dialog files so the dialog can't be resized
infinitely small ;)
thanks
john
p.s. A new tarball of qtarch should be on its way soon that fixes the
compile troubles - although you don't really need it as you can just do
"touch *.dlg && make" in module/kde for it to work again.
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> We should make a way to ensure that LyXFunc are called with the
Lars> correct number of arguments and also that the arguments are of
Lars> the correct type. I think I have a nice solution for
Lars> this...first we change the Ly
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I want to convert a string to int:
Lars> int a = stream_cast("123");
Lars> or a int to string:
Lars> string a = stream_cast(123);
This looks interesting indeed. The name is a bit weird, since it is
not clear where the strea
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| A little hack to add that vsnprintf stuff and yipeee! A working LyX at last.
I just added my own hack... how does your hack work?
Lgb
A little hack to add that vsnprintf stuff and yipeee! A working LyX at last.
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| void_class_fun_t(C & ct, void(C::*p)(A))
| : c(ct), cmf(p) {}
| void operator()(A & a) const {
| - return (c.*cmf)(a);
| + (c.*cmf)(a);
fixed.
| template
| -back_insert_fun_iterator
| +const_back_ins
see fix.
A
Index: src/support/lyxfunctional.h
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/support/lyxfunctional.h,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 lyxfunctional.h
--- src/support/lyxfunctional.h 2000/10/13 14:10:35
Small patches to let KDE (and hopefully Gnome, but untested) build again,
and also some readonly stuff for the KDE dialogs.
Two small bugs (?) I noticed :
1) with ro documents, Insert->Cross Reference is still selectable
2) behaviour change - when entering new reference entries in the
bibliogr
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I have not tried to compile this yet, but can you try the
Lars> current cvs (in two minutes).
Seems to work, although there is a small typo in the void_memfun_t
constructor.
Hmm, I get:
cxx: Error: ../../lyx-devel/src/suppor
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:27:05PM +0200, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While trying to understand who to translate unicode characters in Lyx, I've
> found these LateX codes that are not correctly translated by RelyX :
>
> 1) Latex code \i (dotless i ) is translated in \i when it shou
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > Angus> I've done it. See previous patch
| >
| > Do you mean the patch should be applied? I thought it was just a
| > proof-of-concept
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Hmm, it seems indeed the word does not exist... That's part of the
>> reason I wanted people to check it out. What am I supposed to use
>> here? Does 'versioning' make more sense? 'versions
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> I've done it. See previous patch
>
> Do you mean the patch should be applied? I thought it was just a
> proof-of-concept.
Sorry, thought you'd missed it!
You're right, I'd not
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> - Other: documentation update, UI translation updates (translators,
>> please send me updated po files for 1.1.5fix1!).
Angus> fix2?
Yes, something like that.
JMarc
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
Lars> | Lars> Allmost the right fix, instead of adding const versions
Lars> to | Lars> compare_memfun_
> I had a fast look and what I don't like is all this some option
> stuff couldn't that be handled with something like ,
> as this seems much nicer too me!
I think Pierre-Olivier got it right in general. It is some kind of
religious debate on what goes in ... and what goes in "...".
The best ru
On 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Hmm, it seems indeed the word does not exist... That's part of the
> reason I wanted people to check it out. What am I supposed to use
> here? Does 'versioning' make more sense? 'versions'?
>
I would probably just say "LyX version scheme" and "LyX no
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The patch attached allows me to compile all but fmt.C in current CVS.
|
| I emphasise the ChangeLog entry "...this is a hack and want no responsibility
| for it. It is meant merely as a pointer for Those-Who-Know-Better!
|
| Could you also put cstda
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> - Other: documentation update, UI translation updates (translators,
> please send me updated po files for 1.1.5fix1!).
fix2?
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|
| Lars> Allmost the right fix, instead of adding const versions to
| Lars> compare_memfun_t a const_compare_memfun_t should have been
| Lars> added.
|
| Are you planing to do
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I've done it. See previous patch
Do you mean the patch should be applied? I thought it was just a
proof-of-concept.
JMarc
A nice thing that popped out on clpc++
template
T stream_cast(S const & s)
{
stringstream st;
st << s;
st.gseek(0);
T t;
st >> t;
return t;
}
this is a very simplistic implementation...
I want to convert a string to int:
int a = stream_cast("12
Hello,
I'd like to release 1.1.5fix2 on Monday. There have been many fixes
accumulated, some of which concern important bugs. In particular, many
bugs were squashed after my previous status update (thanks Baruch and
Dekel!).
Therefore, as usual, I'd be glad if some of you could take the time t
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> Allmost the right fix, instead of adding const versions to
> Lars> compare_memfun_t a const_compare_memfun_t should have been
> Lars> added.
>
> Are you planing to do it?
>
We should make a way to ensure that LyXFunc are called with the
correct number of arguments and also that the arguments are of the
correct type. I think I have a nice solution for this...first we
change the LyXFunc::dispatch to a different type of arg...
LyXFunc::dispatch(FuncSlot const & funcsl
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Allmost the right fix, instead of adding const versions to
Lars> compare_memfun_t a const_compare_memfun_t should have been
Lars> added.
Are you planing to do it?
JMarc
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Hmm, is the use of autoconf/make still in transition ? It seems
John> this system is relatively stable now ?
OK, I removed that.
John> And since it is friday, I must say I don't really the need to
John> make up a word "versionning" ;)
some thoughts...
We really need to enance the minibuffer a bit. First of all it is very
wrong to have the minibuffer know about LyXfunc.
The LyXFunc should call the minibuffer not the other way around. Son a
sense the minibuffer should be a lot dumber that it is now.
What functions do we need
On 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I have shamelessly taken the preamble of Allan's first LDN issue and
> put it at the beginning of README. This will hopefully clear up some
> confusion. I'd appreciate if others could have a look and suggest
> improvements.
>
> JMarc
>
Hmm, is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| LyX only works with modern compilers and operating systems. If your
| system does not conform to latest standards, do not even bother to
| ask (especially on fridays).
Jupp, that should do it.
Lgb
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> The following tiny patch is needed to get it to compile on my
Angus> machine. Angus
Applied.
JMarc
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I don't care shit about word-prcessors, I care about modern C++
Lars> programs. (and in this case modern C programs).
So we'll be able to drop autoconf soon? We just have to replace the
INSTALL file with
LyX only works with
I have shamelessly taken the preamble of Allan's first LDN issue and
put it at the beginning of README. This will hopefully clear up some
confusion. I'd appreciate if others could have a look and suggest
improvements.
JMarc
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Well I get stuck (this morning's CVS; Lars' huge patch) in fmt.C
| > |
| > | cxx: Error: fmt.C, line 32: #282 the global scope has no "vsnprintf"
| > | int const r = ::vsnprintf(str, size, fmtstr, ap);
| > |
| > | needless to say, t
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> But I also get: FormCommand::showInset(InsetCommand*)
> >> FormCommand::createInset(const std::basic_string
> Angus> [snip...]
>
>
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| See http://www.ijs.si/software/snprintf/ for a free implementation and
| pointers to a whole heap of others.
Pity that it does not support the &1$ notation.
But this will be a nice bandaid on machines that does not have
vsnprintf by default.
See http://www.ijs.si/software/snprintf/ for a free implementation and
pointers to a whole heap of others.
A.
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> But I also get: FormCommand::showInset(InsetCommand*)
>> FormCommand::createInset(const std::basic_string [snip...]
Angus> My bad. Don't forget to include FormInset.C when hacking a
Ang
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> BTW, I've said it before but I'll say it again anyway since it's friday:
> You don't have to call your files by the same name as the xforms code.
> I would have expected KDE for example to use DialogX myself -- or
> whatever naming convention exists for
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> But I also get:
> FormCommand::showInset(InsetCommand*)
> FormCommand::createInset(const std::basic_stringparams();
- ih_ = inset->hide.connect(slot(this, &FormInset::hide));
+ ih_ = inset->hide.connect(slot(this, &FormCommand::hide));
I tried to add to the CREDITS file all people which name appears in
the ChangeLog and who were not mentionned. Of course I made mistakes.
Of course I forgot people.
Fell free to look it up and complain to me (but only on fridays).
JMarc
On 12-Oct-2000 Gaillard Pierre-Olivier wrote:
> Hello,
Hello Pierre-Olivier!
>
> Here is a sample output of the new XML output I have added to my LyX
> copy.
> This has been produced by a patched version of LyX that uses
> XMLSAXPrettifier (which at the moment does not make pretty output, so
> "Baruch" == Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Baruch> This now includes patches for this both problems. The patches
Baruch> are done against 1.1.6cvs but I have no reason to believe it
Baruch> won't apply to 1.1.5fix1, anyway I dont want to believe
Baruch> otherwise :-)
I applied the
> "Baruch" == Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Baruch> I still think that PrepareForCommand() is more meaningfull.
OK, let's use that. A more important point: in peek_event, should the
function return 1 to tell that the event has been handled? It is just
a question, I have not tried y
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
