Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Lars> You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of
Lars> the function?

I'm not sure what I mean exactly, but we could declare the arguments
of the function so that there type can be checked by dispatch, and the
the func would use string_arg[1], int_arg[2] and the code would check
the function uses the arguments in the way it declared it should.

Maybe it is not useful, after all. Or too complicated for what it
provides. Anyway, I think we should not need tests at the beginning of
each function.

JMarc