On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Lars> You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of > Lars> the function? > > I'm not sure what I mean exactly, but we could declare the arguments > of the function so that there type can be checked by dispatch, and the > the func would use string_arg[1], int_arg[2] and the code would check > the function uses the arguments in the way it declared it should. > > Maybe it is not useful, after all. Or too complicated for what it > provides. Anyway, I think we should not need tests at the beginning of > each function. of course, if you used XTL, this is built in...
- LyXFunc/LyXAction Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Angus Leeming
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Allan Rae
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Allan Rae
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Andre Poenitz
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyXFunc/LyXAction John Levon