Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| > >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > Lars> You mean so that we can have a centralized testing at the top of
| > Lars> the function?
| >
| > I'm not sure what I mean exactly, but we could declare the arguments
| > of the function so that there type can be checked by dispatch, and the
| > the func would use string_arg[1], int_arg[2] and the code would check
| > the function uses the arguments in the way it declared it should.
| >
| > Maybe it is not useful, after all. Or too complicated for what it
| > provides. Anyway, I think we should not need tests at the beginning of
| > each function.
|
| of course, if you used XTL, this is built in...
How?
Remember that you need to input the arg somewhere too, and that I
should be albel to do things like:
FuncSlot(...).arg("123); // we never really entered a int
int i = stream_cast<int, string>(fs[1]);
Lgb
