On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Steven van Dijk wrote:
> Come to think of it, when LyX is released, will
> anybody send email to the major Linux distributors?
It might help to send a pre-announcement. Lots of people have been
waiting for Linux 2.2.0, but since it recently arrived, they think they
don't ne
One nit - please change "LyX Graphical Tutorial" to "LyX Graphical Tour"
down toward the end of the release. John Weiss suggested this change to
distinguish it from the real Tutorial; I agree with his suggestion.
Thanks.
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've put it at http://home1.2.sbbs.se/pjp/lyx-sv.html
All the current sv_*-files are there
Joacim
-
With both feet on the ground, you won't get very far.
-- Loesje
src/include/Regexp.h won't compile (Linux, egcs)
>From my /usr/include/regexp.h:
/* POSIX says that must be included (by the caller) before
. */
--- Regexp.h.oldFri Jan 29 02:45:46 1999
+++ Regexp.hFri Jan 29 02:46:07 1999
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
// Some structure in regex.h declea
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I noticed by coincidence that there is a "critical"
> bug in the Debian package for LyX regarding the
> copyright.
>
> The bug is number 32299.
>
> The question is whether the clarification of the
> licensing question we have put on the web page is
Hi!
I updated the COPYING file with
the text from Rick.
Also, I fixed the click policy problem that Fred reported a long
time ago.
Greets,
Asger
Yes. They're both teleportation stories. But in the original, the
result was an immediate genetic melting, no "morphing" after the fact.
Thank God Star Trek never did a "Fly" story about the transporter.
Amazing, just the "two Kirks" episode. Compare that with every 3rd
episode of the sequel s
Great work. Congratulations.
A few nits.
Best regards
--
Larry S. Marso
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 11:15:22PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> -
> Public release of LyX version 1.0.0
> ===
>
> LyX is an advanced open
> If there are large blocks of text (i.e., simple HTML) that need to be
> written, I'm sure there will be a few fluent English writers happy to take
> on the task, and then you would only have to debug the text, not write it
> all.
As I wrote some other place: please go ahead and do that.
> Spea
> Hi, I found LyX and guessed that would be the perfect idea
> to get people using LaTeX instead of stupid MS-Word.
>
> I have been using LaTeX+CJK package for Chinese documents in LaTeX.
> CJK did a great job and it is an add-on package which can work with
> LaTeX2e. I know LyX can not let me ed
> If everyone sees it, any recommended solution? One idea is to break it up
> into 5 or so pages, that way only 15 thumbs will be loaded at a time vs.
> 75. Another possibility is to have each image pop up a new browser window,
> leaving the main window intact. Yuck. I guess I might be able to do
> one minute ago, my LyX (1.0.0-pl8) crashed without emergency handling.
> Fortunately I saved some minutes earlier and did only very few
> changes.
> Hope that helps, I'll save a copy of the document (10 pages, 6
> figures), I can send it if this is not enough info.
I'm not sure whether you did
Yes, sorry LyX members. My email client sometimes encrypts messages
when it's not appropriate. Sorry for the wasted bandwidth.
Best regards
--
Larry S. Marso
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 04:31:58PM -0500, Amir Karger wrote:
> Your last message was PGP signed!
>
> -Amir
> On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 10:16:28PM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> > I sent the mail to the debain guy, because I noticed that
> > the LyX problem was "holding back" Debian 1.3, because they
> > judged it to be a "critical" bug. (Politics...)
> Politics is right. Did any of them ever
asger added,
>I iterated,
> > I *really* think we need more than the web page says. Particularly,
> > the sections of the body which we specifically disclaim.
> > I believe the solution is a clarification that provides:
> > 1) the legal reasons that we aren't GPL.
> > 2) That the clarification
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 10:16:28PM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> I sent the mail to the debain guy, because I noticed that
> the LyX problem was "holding back" Debian 1.3, because they
> judged it to be a "critical" bug. (Politics...)
Politics is right. Did any of them ever try to con
>Remember the Scifi movie about the scientist experimenting with
>teleportation, that got mixed up with a fly?
called, for some inexplicable reason, "The Fly" :)
Which was a remake. I forget what he was messing with in the original
(or was that also teleportation?)
rick
--
OK, let's call this final, bar something serious that HAS to be fixed.
Remember the Scifi movie about the scientist experimenting with
teleportation, that got mixed up with a fly? Well this version feels a
bit like that. It's a mixed quantum state of my previous one and Larry
Marso's reworking o
application/pgp-encrypted
Binary data
> I *really* think we need more than the web page says. Particularly,
> the sections of the body which we specifically disclaim.
>
> I believe the solution is a clarification that provides:
>
> 1) the legal reasons that we aren't GPL.
> 2) That the clarification is not a *change* in the license
I *really* think we need more than the web page says. Particularly,
the sections of the body which we specifically disclaim.
This isn't a change in our license; we are not GPL to start with. And
with debian's GPL interpretation (which i'll repeat, is a legal
absurdity), debian cannot distri
> I don't know whether this is particular to 1.0.0pre8, but I just replaced
> a space with a hard space, and this caused a word to be pulled back from
> the next line to the current one. I then went down to the next line, and
> came back up by moving the cursor left; when I had moved a little way
Hi!
I noticed by coincidence that there is a "critical"
bug in the Debian package for LyX regarding the
copyright.
The bug is number 32299.
The question is whether the clarification of the
licensing question we have put on the web page is
a change to the license or an attempt at a
clarificati
I don't know whether this is particular to 1.0.0pre8, but I just replaced
a space with a hard space, and this caused a word to be pulled back from
the next line to the current one. I then went down to the next line, and
came back up by moving the cursor left; when I had moved a little way
along th
I noted a while ago that I couldn't print many mailmerge documents
after saving and opening them. I just traced down why:
Those grey boxes to hold ERT that I used don't seem to work right. I
insert a box with
\setcounter{page}{1}
successfully. I now have a lyx document. But close and
Hello,
could you send more information concerning the bug ?
Can you reproduce it? Also, could you send a whole
stack trace (not only top of it).
Cheers,
Etienne
> I'll just reregister my opinion that while open source is a great thing,
> it's not what we're selling here. We've mentioned that LyX (and latex) are
> open source. Linux et al. are doing just fine in the press and don't need
> our PR help. "LyX runs on Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and most proprieta
Gebhard Thier wrote:
> - the German SZ is displayed correctly but printed as "SS"
Insert this into Layout -> LaTex Preamble:
\usepackage{german}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
Regards
Daniel Naber
PS: www.suse.de offers a great database that covers 'bugs' like this.
--
PGP Key fingerprint
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 12:32:38PM -0500, Larry S. Marso wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:24:06PM -0500, Larry S. Marso wrote:
>
> > LyX runs on standard Unix platforms, including Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD
> > and most proprietary Unix systems.
>
> Having taken another look, the above might be
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:24:06PM -0500, Larry S. Marso wrote:
> LyX runs on standard Unix platforms, including Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD
> and most proprietary Unix systems.
Having taken another look, the above might better read:
Lyx runs on the free, open source Unix platforms Linux, FreeBSD
> > "Larry" == Larry S Marso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Larry> Er, these are comments *on* Martin's latest. Best regards --
>
> Isn't it a (partial) rewrite of Martin's latest??
>
> I beginning to be lost in all these versions...
>
> JMarc
It *was* a comment on my latest brainchild,
Hi,
Thanks for your good softwate of LyX.
But, I found a bug in LyX.
The message from DDD debuger is follows,
"Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x401e79bd in _IO_unbuffer_all () at genops.c:628
genops.c:628: No such file or directory."
When I try to exit the LyX, I meet t
OK, I'll put it in development/. Thanks for the files. BTW, I see that
/usr/local is hardcoded in the spec file. Is it intentional? Isn't
there a way to make spec files relocatable?
You mean, if it is possible to make the rpm relocatable? I'll look
into it. It also depends on the p
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> I know we're not thinking about 1.1 right now, with the deadline
Amir> and all, but I notice that the 1.1 README wasn't updated when
Amir> the 1.0 README was. So it still has all the old mailing list
Amir> stuff, etc. It also says that
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> You're right. Why don't you add that and, if no one complains,
Amir> check it in.
Too late, I deleted your mail. I have to leave now, so if you send it
again, I'll commit that.
JMarc
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 04:54:29PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> I'm attaching a new README which contains the language support
> Amir> stuff. (You may or may not like where I chose to put it). I also
> Amir> added a paragra
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> I'm attaching a new README which contains the language support
Amir> stuff. (You may or may not like where I chose to put it). I also
Amir> added a paragraph at the end under "How can I participate in
Amir> development" saying that if
> "Larry" == Larry S Marso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Larry> Er, these are comments *on* Martin's latest. Best regards --
Isn't it a (partial) rewrite of Martin's latest??
I beginning to be lost in all these versions...
JMarc
Er, these are comments *on* Martin's latest.
Best regards
--
Larry S. Marso
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 04:03:10PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> This looks good. I'd say I like it almost as much as Martin's
> latest.
>
> JMarc
>
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 04:31:10PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> Actually, though, there *is* a fr_menus.bind. Are you talking
> Amir> about something different, JMarc?
>
> Yes. I mean the nice little underlined letters in
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> Actually, though, there *is* a fr_menus.bind. Are you talking
Amir> about something different, JMarc?
Yes. I mean the nice little underlined letters in menus and popups are
not done.
JMarc
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 10:31:38AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> I hope people will respond, since we need to decide this in the
> Amir> next few days. We *could* make this much shorter by not having
> Amir> one line per lan
> "Larry" == Larry S Marso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Larry> I worked over the language. Hope this is helpful.
Hi Larry,
This looks good. I'd say I like it almost as much as Martin's
latest.
JMarc
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 11:26:08AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Amir> wrote:
>> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Amir> I'm enclosing a new version of templatex/revtex.lyx. Comments
Amir> welcome. If noone comm
forgot the file!
#This file was created by Tue Jan 26 17:48:36 1999
#LyX 1.0 (C) 1995-1998 Matthias Ettrich and the LyX Team
\lyxformat 2.15
\textclass revtex
\options aps,manuscript
\layout Title
Insert your Title Here
\layout Author
Author1
\begin_float footnote
\layout Standard
Author t
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 11:26:08AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> I'm enclosing a new version of templatex/revtex.lyx. Comments
> Amir> welcome. If noone comments, I'll just check it in in a couple of
> Amir> days. (ooh! a th
Having finally got around to trying to make lyx again (after being bit
by the beyond char 0 loop), I'm having those same cvs troubles.
I ran automake, autoconf, and autoheader (after finding that my
ill-advised update to debian frozen had removed some of these and
assorted other useful things
> "Mate" == Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mate> Hope you are not asking me. There was a discussion about
Mate> perhaps putting a lyx.spec file in the distribution---so I made
Mate> one. You can do with it whatever you want---can leave it out
Mate> too.
OK, I'll put it in developm
Hi LyXers,
this bug is new in 1.0.0-pl8, i.e. it wasn't in 1.0.0-pl2, my last
version:
1) define a math-marco with one argument, say "<#1>".
2) Enter math-mode, insert this macro and put a char in, say 'a', you
get || (The | symbolize the math-mode margin)
3) Leave math-mode with ESC
4) Use
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 08:04:25AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Mate" == Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mate> I have made a spec file for 1.0.0. My next two messages are:
> Mate> lyx.spec
>
> Mate> lyx.rpm.README
>
> Where shall I put that? In development/?
Hope y
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
JML> > "Richard" == Richard Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JML>
Richard> Since my last complaint I've written some code and tested
Richard> it. I've found that it works correctly. Please test it and
Richard> include the code in future d
Hi,
I discovered a little oddity in version 1.0.0pre8 (running SuSE Linux
6.0):
- document is set to German
- keyboard is set to German
- all German Umlaute are displayed correctly and are printed correctly
- the German SZ is displayed correctly but printed as "SS"
Please let me know if you
> "Mate" == Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mate> I have made a spec file for 1.0.0. My next two messages are:
Mate> lyx.spec
Mate> lyx.rpm.README
Where shall I put that? In development/?
JMarc
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I was a bit disappointed, at the time the message about SciWord was
> sent to the list, to see that you did not show more interest for
> it. So I just stored it, waiting for the right moment :)
At that time I was rather busy with things I left t
54 matches
Mail list logo
