Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Hans-Joachim Baader wrote:
> > test10, compiled with gcc 2.95.2, won't boot on one of my machine.
> > It stops after the "now booting the kernel" message. Yes, I have
> > configured Virtual Terminal and VGA text console.
>
> Does it boot with the attached patch?
Nope, it do
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 12:01:09AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Please grab 1.1.14, there were a number of bug fixes since 1.1.10. You
> can get this version in the recently-released 2.4.0-test10 kernel, or
> download from http://sourceforge.net/projects/gkernel/
Hi!
I'd like to report a bug, t
Hi,
My group runs computations on a small linux cluster of RedHat 7.0 dual
PIII-700's with 512MB RAM/512MB swap. We have been experiencing some
lockups/poor performance on 2.4.x kernels when running two computations at
once. I've narrowed it down to a reproducible problem under 2.4.0-test10
(g
"Pasi Kärkkäinen" wrote:
>
> I added show_stack(0); to the mm/page_alloc.c :
>
> /* No luck.. */
> printk(KERN_ERR "__alloc_pages: %lu-order allocation failed.\n", order)
> show_stack(0);
> return NULL;
>
> Then, when the first stack-dump came to kern.log, I gave
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, David Mansfield wrote:
>
> > I'd like to report what seems like a performance problem in the latest
> > kernels. Actually, all recent kernels have exhibited this problem, but
> > I was waiting for the new VM stuff to stabilize before
Hi!
> My list of 2.4.0-testX problems
>
> Problem description:
>
> 1. kernel compiled w/o FB support. When attempting to switch
> back to X from VC1-6 system locks hard for SMP. Nada thing
> fixes this except hard reset... no Alt-SysRq-B, nothing
> DRI not enabled. Vide
Hans-Joachim Baader wrote:
> test10, compiled with gcc 2.95.2, won't boot on one of my machine.
> It stops after the "now booting the kernel" message. Yes, I have
> configured Virtual Terminal and VGA text console.
> 00:00.0 Host bridge: Acer Laboratories Inc. [ALi] M1541 (rev 04)
> 00:01.0 PCI b
Hi,
test10, compiled with gcc 2.95.2, won't boot on one of my machine.
It stops after the "now booting the kernel" message. Yes, I have
configured Virtual Terminal and VGA text console.
The configuration also contains Reiserfs (as a module) but that
shouldn't make a difference.
The system is a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What I haven't seen yet is
> an explanation of why kgcc can't be used for compiling *everything*
It can. But if we are talking about 2.4.x, I want my kernel built with
the improved gcc-2.95.2 -- unless there is a good reason not to do so --
and kgcc is egcs-1.1.2 not g
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 04:54:18PM -0700, Cort Dougan wrote:
> Since you're setting yourself up as a proponent of this can you explain why
> RedHat includes a compiler that doesn't work with the kernel? Don't get
It actually does not compile only 2.2 kernels unless they are patched (the
patches
Hi,
I have started a new virtual filesystem project, Translation Filesystem
at
http://trfs.sourceforge.net/ Description of the project is given below.
It's still at a concept stage. If someone has any ideas about any useful
translators that fit in this framework please write to me.
Any feedback
I've been following this kgcc discussion with interest for weeks now and there's
one thing that still puzzles me. Everyone on both sides of the issue seems to
be saying that kgcc (AKA egcs 1.1.2) is used because the gcc versions shipped by
several vendors don't compile the kernel correctly. Wh
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Pieter van Prooijen wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Hi,
>
> During kernel compilation (or other heavy use of the machine), the
> machine
> locks up. No oops, no alt-sysreq, only a hardware reset is
> possible.
>
> M
TimO wrote:
>
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > An update of the Via audio driver for Linux 2.4.x kernels has been
> > posted at
> >
> > http://gtf.org/garzik/drivers/via82cxxx/
> >
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Somewhere between v1.1.8 and 1.1.10 (I haven't tried 1.1.9), the output
Please grab 1.1.14,
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> [root]:# gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-linux-gnu/gcc-2.95.2/specs
> gcc version gcc-2.95.2 19991024 (release)
> [root]:# gcc -V 2.8.1 -v
> Using builtin specs. <== danger Will Robinson. (think about includes etc)
> gcc driver version gcc-2.95.2 19991024
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > Mandrake kgcc I believe is egcs 1.1.2
>
> Correct...
>
> Though Richard Henderson's message recent about 'gcc -V ...' not doing
> the right thing has me worried... egcs 1.1.2 not gcc 2.95.2 is
> definitely being called when '/usr/bin
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> An update of the Via audio driver for Linux 2.4.x kernels has been
> posted at
>
> http://gtf.org/garzik/drivers/via82cxxx/
>
Hi Jeff,
Somewhere between v1.1.8 and 1.1.10 (I haven't tried 1.1.9), the output
quality has degraded noticeably. The first thing I noti
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 02:32:44PM -0500, Michael O'Donnell wrote:
[snip]
> Also, here's a possibly useless personal note WRT the
> eepro100 resource msgs, FWIW: I was recently using remote
> KGDB to work on an unrelated problem on an MP Pentium
> box with integrated eepro100. Whenever I'
Hello,
I believe I've found some corner-case overflow bugs in the virtual memory routines of
the kernel.
I'm tracking down some bugs with our driver on a 1 Gig system. This forces the
kernel's VMALLOC_AREA into very high memory, exactly where based on the
VMALLOC_RESERVE value, but roughly 0
"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2000 02:12:31 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>
> > You're not changing 2.4.x to use kgcc, are you? It seems to be working
> > fine under gcc 2.95.2+fixes...
> >
>
> What means "using kgcc" ?
Alan has a script in 2.2.x which attempts to find the best compiler
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 09:46:19 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 05:14:34PM +0100, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Of corse right! BTW. There are tons of places where log2 is calculated
> explicitly in kernel which should be replaced with the corresponding
> built
Yes..long standing bug, and I don't have sufficient time to get my feet wet in the IDE
dept
and fix it.
-d
"M.H.VanLeeuwen" wrote:
> > Disable PIIXn tuning and recompile your kernel. How does it fare now?
>
> Yep, disabling (opposite of "enabling") does allow the kernel to boot just fine.
> P
On Thu, 02 Nov 2000 02:12:31 Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>
> You're not changing 2.4.x to use kgcc, are you? It seems to be working
> fine under gcc 2.95.2+fixes...
>
What means "using kgcc" ?. I think it should be done even before.
It is not using "egcs" as you seem to be thinking. You cant put your
On Wed, 01 Nov 2000 17:48:16 Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> (btw, make sure you're using the -7 revision of the VM-global patch, as it
> includes the same MM corruption bugfix that is been included into 18pre18)
>
> Andrea
"Includes" means that the full patch is not included in pre18 ?.
So, will
john slee writes:
>hardware:
> * abit be6-2 mainboard
> * 533 celeron (not overclocked)
> * 192mb sdram
> * seagate 20gb ide disk (not on ata66 port)
>
>compiler: gcc version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux)
>
>it gets as far as uncompressing the k
I am attempting to cross-compile a 2.4 kernel for a PowerPC arch on an
Intel machine, of which I have Debian 2.2 installed. I have successfully
compiled a 2.4test9 kernel, but I got the following error message the first
time I compiled (it failed due to this):
powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu-ld -T
RH 7.0 up to date, kgcc, binutils-2.10.0.33-1
intel SR440BX motherboard, P3/600; rock solid machine otherwise.
2.4.0-test10 shows a rather unholy appetite for ext2 filesystems (for some
reason it munches down /dev regularly, and nibbles at others).
Mounting an IDE CD (modular ide-cd, isofs) hang
Alan Cox wrote:
> J. A. Magallon wrote:
> > I have noticed that in latest patch for 2.4.0, the global Makefile
> > no more tries to find a kgcc, and falls back to gcc.
The global Makefile in 2.4.x -never- looked for kgcc.
> > I suppose because 2.7.2.3 is no more good for kernel, but still you
>
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 06:04:38PM -0500, George wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> >kgcc is a redhat'ism. They invented this package because their 2.96 fails
> >compiling a stable kernel. However, it's not a good idea to dist specific
> >code into the official kernel tree.
>
> Bi
According to Jeff Garzik:
> Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> > By default Debian comes
> > with gcc 2.95.2 which compiles current 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels just
> > fine.
>
> Linux-Mandrake 7.2 doesn't seem to be missing gcc patches that
> Debian has... and in our testing we've found that some dr
H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> I think at least supporting a "kgcc" compiler makes sense,
> conceptually (although it probably should have been called "kcc", but
> it's too late now.)
There was already some userland package named kcc, with a kcc
binary. A Kanji converter of some sort
Title: Untitled
Discount Offshore
Brokerage!!!
Trade in the privacy of your own
home or office from anywhere in the world via the
internet...
10
to 1 Margin $50,000.00 allows
you to trade $500,000.00 with no interest...
Tax Free Secure Bahamian
Account with an Inter
> So other distro's did it too. Why did nobody complain till RedHat
> did it? Because no one else decided to use, as the default, a bleeding edge
> compiler that not only won't compile the kernel but won't even touch a lot of
> userspace code either.
Actually the first people to do exac
> } before on this list) and we didn't have time to implement and QA the
>
> Oh, my.
Doing the QA on a kernel change of compiler is a long hard process. It took
until 2.2.17 to apparently get a 2.2 kernel solid with gcc 2.95.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> We already know we are a bunch of pinheads wrt. the userland compiler
> issue, full stop. It need not be restated several hundred more times.
> Believe me, after such a large
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> By default Debian comes
> with gcc 2.95.2 which compiles current 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels just
> fine.
Linux-Mandrake 7.2 doesn't seem to be missing gcc patches that
Debian has... and in our testing we've found that some drivers are
still miscompiled by gcc 2.95.
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 06:33:34PM -0500, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> Aaron Denney wrote:
> > I am not aware of any userspace NFSv3 server. Your best bet would
> > probably to take the v2 server and mutate it. Why do you want this beast?
>
> So I can use Linux rather than Solaris 7 and the Solsti
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 23:57:34 +0100
> From: Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> kgcc is a redhat'ism.
>
>Debian has it too.
Not quite. Debian does have an completely optional gcc272 package. It
is _not_ ins
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:37:00PM +0100, raptor wrote:
: I've recently experienced a problem with hd geometry on Linux kernel
: 2.2.17. I've got 2 identical hard drives, set up as LBA on BIOS. BIOS sees
: them both with geometry 1245/255/63, while Linux sees the second one as
: 19857/16/63.
Hello.
We have a webserver running the Slackware distribution of Linux, with
Kernel version 2.2.6. Our problem is that this machine looses the
ethernet sub-interfaces (i.e. eth0:xx) and we are wondering why this is
and what we need to do to fix it. Any help would be greatly appreciated,
also pleas
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:55:13PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > What about the fact anyone can crash a box using ioctls on net
> > devices and waiting for an unload - was this fixed ?
> The ioctls of network devices are generally unsafe on SMP, because
> they run wit
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Michael Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Aaron Denney wrote:
> > I am not aware of any userspace NFSv3 server. Your best bet would
> > probably to take the v2 server and mutate it. Why do you want this beast?
>
> So
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> If you designed it with just one call-gate, with one entry point,
> you would have exactly what we have now except you would execute
> a `call CALL_GATE` instead of `int 0x80`. This turns out to be
> 6 of one and 1/2 dozen of another when it comes to performance.
The f
Aaron Denney wrote:
> I am not aware of any userspace NFSv3 server. Your best bet would
> probably to take the v2 server and mutate it. Why do you want this beast?
So I can use Linux rather than Solaris 7 and the Solstice Disk Suite,
which performs like crap thanks to UFS, and the Linux NFS v2
"CRADOCK, Christopher" wrote:
>
> I have a similar hardware list and I don't observe any of these problems on
> 2.4.0-test10x. Is it possibly a hardware conflict somewhere?
>
> What I do see occasionally is if X was ever heavy on the memory usage (say
> I've run GIMP for a couple of hours) then
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 11:30:50PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Yes, but what's more important is that all of these "kgcc" variants are
> > gcc 2.7.2.x-based (unless there's one I don't know about). And we don't want
> > 2.7.2.x, we want egcs 1.1.2 or newer (but not gcc 2.9x, unless you know what
>
Hello,
For some time now we're observing a very bad [tm] network
problem with our 3Com 3c905B Cyclone card. After booting the
network works just fine, but after a few days ( ranging from five
to 10) really hard network problems occur, rendering the network
accessabilty to zero; only manua
> kgcc is a redhat'ism. They invented this package because their 2.96 fails
> compiling a stable kernel.
> However, it's not a good idea to dist specific code into the official kernel
> tree.
The changes in 2.2.18pre for picking the compiler are actually for multiple
distributions. The 'kgcc' con
David Ford wrote:
>
> "M.H.VanLeeuwen" wrote:
>
> > 3. Enabling PIIX4, kernel locks hard when printing the partition
> >tables for hdc. hdc has no partitions.
> >I think this problem is on Ted's problem list???
>
> Disable PIIXn tuning and recompile your kernel. How does it fare now?
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 11:40:58PM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote:
>> I have noticed that in latest patch for 2.4.0, the global Makefile
>> no more tries to find a kgcc, and falls back to gcc.
>> I suppose because 2.7.2.3 is no more good for kernel, but sti
Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> You write:
> > what would be the way of starting a sub-process in a module which then would
> > run in the background? I guess plain fork() won't work?
>
> We did this in one of our filesystem modules to have our own async cache
> flush daemon. One thing you need to wa
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 11:40:58PM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> I have noticed that in latest patch for 2.4.0, the global Makefile
> no more tries to find a kgcc, and falls back to gcc.
> I suppose because 2.7.2.3 is no more good for kernel, but still you
> can use 2.91, 2.95.2 or 2.96(??). Is
> I have noticed that in latest patch for 2.4.0, the global Makefile
> no more tries to find a kgcc, and falls back to gcc.
> I suppose because 2.7.2.3 is no more good for kernel, but still you
> can use 2.91, 2.95.2 or 2.96(??). Is that a patch that leaked in
> the way to test10, or is for anothe
On Wed, 01 Nov 2000 Michael Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:59:05PM -0500, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> > > Is there a working userspace nfs v3 server for linux?
> >
> > Yes, just install user mode linux and use its v3 knfsd server.
>
> Does an
I have noticed that in latest patch for 2.4.0, the global Makefile
no more tries to find a kgcc, and falls back to gcc.
I suppose because 2.7.2.3 is no more good for kernel, but still you
can use 2.91, 2.95.2 or 2.96(??). Is that a patch that leaked in
the way to test10, or is for another reason ?
Wow, I bet that's been there awhile.
BTW, did you submit this patch earlier? I don't
recall having seen it.
I'll forward it.
Thanks,
~Randy_
|randy.dunlap_at_intel.com503-677-5408|
|NOTE: Any views presented here are mine alone|
|& may not repres
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 01:42:17PM -0800, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> > Is this bug in the usb-driver (usb-uhci), in the camera's driver
> > (cpia_usb) or in the v4l?
> ~~
> Could there be a memory leak as well? But I expect that
> it's simply that memory is just fragme
On Wed, 01 Nov 2000 09:43:16 -0500,
Skip Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Pentium 3, 256Mb RAM, kernel 2.4.0-test10-pre7 (as well as 2.4.0-test9).
>I installed RH7, compiled the latest development kernels (using kgcc, as
>required with RH7). After the "greynetic" screensaver (installed with
>R
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 10:00:02PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> A -7 to apply to 2.2.18pre17 and _previous_ releases is in the directory
Argh !! Damned sort order - I thought pre9 was the latest :(
Thanks,
--
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
debian
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
During kernel compilation (or other heavy use of the machine), the
machine
locks up. No oops, no alt-sysreq, only a hardware reset is
possible.
Machine is a Toshiba CDT 1640 laptop: 475 MHz K6-II+, 128KB ca
Hmm... This seems to be happening every 20 minutes or so on a mail server
here. This box handles about 25-35 POP3 logins per second and has 1 GB
of RAM (compiled with the kernel at 1GB currently, oops). I have
2.2.18pre15+VM_global on there ready to go, but we haven't rebooted it to
that yet.
Th
Decía Ville Herva:
> Markus Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Oct 26 11:24:13 ns29 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
> > > Oct 26 11:24:15 ns29 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
> > > Oct 26 12:22:21 ns29 kernel: eth0: card reports no resources.
> > > Oct 26 16:16:59 ns2
> but older binutils like 2.9.5 treat these as syntax errors. Sigh.
>
> So how do we want to handle this?
> - ignore the warnings? (yuck; I hate compiler/assembler warnings)
Correct ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
arch/i386/kernel/apm.c and pci-pc.c use the lcall instruction
(call far indirect) for invoking BIOS services.
The following syntax is used:
(apm) lcall %cs:apm_bios_entry
(pci-pc)lcall (%edi)
This works ok with binutils 2.9.5, but binutils 2.10.0.18
(gas 2.10.90) as shipped wit
Hi,
> From: Pasi Kärkkäinen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Forever shall I be. wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 02:57:30PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >
> > > > __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed.
> > > > __alloc
Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> "Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
> >
> > Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > >
> > > Speaking only for myself: on the technical side I don't think you can't be much
> > > faster than moving the performance critical services into the kernel and by
> > > skipping the copies (infact I al
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote:
>
> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >
> > Speaking only for myself: on the technical side I don't think you can't be much
> > faster than moving the performance critical services into the kernel and by
> > skipping the copies (infact I also think that for fileserving skipping th
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> > > I'm trying to turn of the broadcast flag for a network card. But I
> > > can't, why??
> >
> > Your version of `ifconfig` is probably broken (just like mine).
> > `strace` it and see:
> > ioctl(5,
Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:59:05PM -0500, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> > Is there a working userspace nfs v3 server for linux?
>
> Yes, just install user mode linux and use its v3 knfsd server.
Does anyone have any suggestions that aren't jokes, don't require a 2.4
kernel an
Here's the patch to make it compile. I haven't tested this yet, but
I will once I can actually get a chance to sit at the console...
--- SNIP ---
--- /usr/src/linux/include/asm-alpha/param.h.orig Wed Nov 1 12:31:56 2000
+++ /usr/src/linux/include/asm-alpha/param.hWed Nov 1 12:33:22
It seems the cleaning up of the network drivers has been a tad too
aggressive :) There is no init_etherdev() anymore in 3c509.c
The following patch seems to solve the problem.
(the code is taken from a working test10pre5)
Cheers,
lg
--- 3c509.c.test10-broken Wed Nov 1 17:12:08 2000
+++
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> > ioctl(5, SIOCGIFFLAGS, 0xb620) = 0
> > ioctl(5, SIOCSIFFLAGS, 0xb620) = 0
> >
> > In this case the flags were gotten with SIOCGIFFLAGS, then the
> > exact same stuff was written back with SIOCSIFFLAGS.
>
> IFF_BROADCAST is bit nu
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 10:03:27PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:59:01PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> Andrea wrote:
> > (btw, make sure you're using the -7 revision of the VM-global patch, as it
> > includes the same MM corruption bugfix that is been included into 18pre
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:59:01PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
Andrea wrote:
> (btw, make sure you're using the -7 revision of the VM-global patch, as it
> includes the same MM corruption bugfix that is been included into 18pre18)
Damn, I was using -6.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/peo
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > I'm trying to turn of the broadcast flag for a network card. But I
> > can't, why??
>
> Your version of `ifconfig` is probably broken (just like mine).
> `strace` it and see:
> ioctl(5, SIOCGIFFLAGS, 0xb620) = 0
> ioctl(5, SIOCSIFFLAGS,
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:59:05PM -0500, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> Is there a working userspace nfs v3 server for linux?
Yes, just install user mode linux and use its v3 knfsd server.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EM
> > They share an irq, no matter if I'm using intels e100.o driver or the stock
> > linux one. For performance reasons, can I make them each have a different
> > irq? Doing it from ifconfig gives me a notsupported error, with either
> > driver.
>
> Under 2.2 no. Under 2.4 maybe
one question: u
(please cc me, I follow the list on a web page)
The printk()s which enumerate media types during boot will oops
for some eeproms. They use the media type as an index into an
array of strings without doing any bounds checking.
This patch fixes it. The leaf->type is the killer for my card, I
ha
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 12:19:31PM -0800, J J Sloan wrote:
> But why is the "official" release of the lvm utils so buggy?
I guess it was a minor merging typo in the userspace tools and I'm sure Heinz
will solve it shortly now that we're aware of the problem.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
Ok, I'll get back with the oops information ASAP !
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> Jean-Francois,
>
> You are reporting a panic but missing the most important ingredient:
>
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Jean-Francois Patenaude wrote:
> > [5.] Output of Oops.. message (if applicable) with symbolic infor
Thanks Andrea, it all works like a charm with your lvm utils.
But why is the "official" release of the lvm utils so buggy?
Regards,
jjs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.
> They share an irq, no matter if I'm using intels e100.o driver or the stock
> linux one. For performance reasons, can I make them each have a different
> irq? Doing it from ifconfig gives me a notsupported error, with either
> driver.
Under 2.2 no. Under 2.4 maybe
> no kernel hacker...can
Jean-Francois,
You are reporting a panic but missing the most important ingredient:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Jean-Francois Patenaude wrote:
> [5.] Output of Oops.. message (if applicable) with symbolic information
> resolved (see Documentation/oops-tracing.txt)
>
> xx
>
If "xx" means "kiss-k
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> I'm trying to turn of the broadcast flag for a network card. But I
> can't, why??
>
Your version of `ifconfig` is probably broken (just like mine).
`strace` it and see:
ioctl(5, SIOCGIFFLAGS, 0xb620) = 0
ioctl(5, SIOCSIFFLAGS, 0xb620)
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, William T Wilson wrote:
> If rwhod doesn't have an option as to which address to bind to, your only
> choice is to block its communication with ipchains.
I don't think you can specify the addresses. It looks at the interfaces
and sends to the ones that can broadcast.
I have
Is there a working userspace nfs v3 server for linux?
-M
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
First of all I would like to say that 2.2.18p18 does not have the 'card
reports no resources' messages when I saturate the 100mbit network anymore.
But I was wondering about two things:
I have a 815EE board, which has an onboard eepro100 and a pci eepro100.
They share an irq, no matter if I'm
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> I'm trying to turn of the broadcast flag for a network card. But
> I can't, why??
Because ethernet is a broadcast medium (in contrast
to P-t-P media)
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:BA:6E:76:63
> inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcas
"M.H.VanLeeuwen" wrote:
> 3. Enabling PIIX4, kernel locks hard when printing the partition
>tables for hdc. hdc has no partitions.
>I think this problem is on Ted's problem list???
Disable PIIXn tuning and recompile your kernel. How does it fare now?
-d
--
"The difference between 'i
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> I'm trying to turn of the broadcast flag for a network card. But I
> can't, why??
Broadcast determines the type of connection - broadcast or point-to-point
(there can be other types also, but you will not see them much).
You wouldn't want to do this
I'm trying to turn of the broadcast flag for a network card. But I
can't, why??
I have two network-cards in the machine and an application (rwhod) that
wants to send it's messages out on every interface that can broadcast. But
never want to broadcast anything on this interface so why not turn it
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:46:26PM -0200, Carlos E. Gorges wrote:
> 2.2.17 fix need a suse usb backport patch ( I use test2-pre2 ).
FWIW, if you are using USB on the 2.2.x series, use 2.2.18preX as the
backport patch is in there, plus a whole lot of other updates.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
greg@(kr
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, David Mansfield wrote:
> I'd like to report what seems like a performance problem in the latest
> kernels. Actually, all recent kernels have exhibited this problem, but
> I was waiting for the new VM stuff to stabilize before reporting it.
>
> My test is: run 7 processes th
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 09:35:18AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> With the USB driver updates I've already seen, it looks like an
> upcoming 2.4 kernel may no longer need those driver scripts; not
> sure about the 2.2 backports though.
I think one of the "rules" is that the 2.2.x kernel shouldn't
Hi VM/procfs hackers,
System is UP Athlon 700mhz with 256mb ram running vanilla 2.4.0-test10.
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
I'd like to report what seems like a performance problem in the latest
kernels. Actually, all recent kernels have exhibited this problem, bu
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 10:35:50AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > Wrong math. That's 330 million dollars for each compat more each year to
> > fund more Linux development and make us all rich...
>
> Speaking only for myself: on the technical side I don't think yo
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 09:46:19AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What versions of gcc produce the built-in functions?
2.95 and previous. In 2.96 somewhere we fixed a bug that
automatically prototypes these builtin functions for you;
ie with current code you get an undeclared function warning
Hi,
I want to know how does the ide driver calculate the
end of the disk.
Is there any function in the ide driver that finds
the end of the disk?
I dont know the particular ide mailing list.So I have
posted to linux-kernel mailing list.
with regards,
Anil
> linux-2.4.0-test10-pre7/drivers/usb/usb.c introduced a really
> cool feature, where USB drivers can declare a data structure that
> describes the various ID bytes of the USB devices that they are
> relevant to.
It's the same tool architecture used with PCI: modules.pcimap
(and now modules.isa
Hello!
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:55:13PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > What about the fact anyone can crash a box using ioctls on net
> > devices and waiting for an unload - was this fixed ?
What do you mean?
If I understood you correclty, this has been fixed in early 2.3
and never reap
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
