> kgcc is a redhat'ism. They invented this package because their 2.96 fails > compiling a stable kernel. > However, it's not a good idea to dist specific code into the official kernel > tree. The changes in 2.2.18pre for picking the compiler are actually for multiple distributions. The 'kgcc' convention isnt a Red Hat invention btw. Its from Conectiva. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? J . A . Magallon
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ... J . A . Magallon
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-tes... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.... Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Kurt Garloff
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? George
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ... Jan Dvorak
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-tes... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Bill Nottingham
- non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did ... Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where ... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: W... Ben Ford