On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 11:30:50PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Yes, but what's more important is that all of these "kgcc" variants are > > gcc 2.7.2.x-based (unless there's one I don't know about). And we don't want > > 2.7.2.x, we want egcs 1.1.2 or newer (but not gcc 2.9x, unless you know what > > you're doing and are trying to fix the compiler. :)). > > Conectiva kgcc is egcs 1.1.2 > Red Hat kgcc is egcs 1.1.2 > Mandrake kgcc I believe is egcs 1.1.2 heh, ok. i'm wrong. :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Wh... Ralf Baechle
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where ... Andi Kleen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Wh... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Wh... Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Wh... Michael Meissner
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Wh... Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where ... Thomas Pornin
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Tom Rini
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Mike Galbraith
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Wayne . Brown
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? J . A . Magallon
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Wayne . Brown