In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 23:57:34 +0100 > From: Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > kgcc is a redhat'ism. > >Debian has it too. Not quite. Debian does have an completely optional gcc272 package. It is _not_ installed as kgcc (the binary is called gcc272) and you don't _have_ to compile your kernels with it. It is an optional package and you have to actively select and install it. By default Debian comes with gcc 2.95.2 which compiles current 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels just fine. At least I haven't used gcc272 for kernels for at least a year now (I think, first egcs, then gcc 2.95) and on all the servers I administer (and that's quite a few) gcc 2.95 hasn't caused any problems. Mike. -- People get the operating system they deserve. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? J . A . Magallon
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ... J . A . Magallon
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-tes... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.... Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Kurt Garloff
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? George
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ... Jan Dvorak
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-tes... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Bill Nottingham
- non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go ... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did ... Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where ... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: W... Ben Ford
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was R... Tim Riker