According to Jeff Garzik: > Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > > By default Debian comes > > with gcc 2.95.2 which compiles current 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels just > > fine. > > <checks> Linux-Mandrake 7.2 doesn't seem to be missing gcc patches that > Debian has... and in our testing we've found that some drivers are > still miscompiled by gcc 2.95.2+fixes. I'm not so sure you are correct > here... Really? Interesting! I'm not claiming I am completely correct, I'm just stating what seems to be current Debian policy. Can you tell me what drivers are miscompiled by 2.95.2, I'd appreciate that. Mike. -- People get the operating system they deserve. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? J . A . Magallon
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Kurt Garloff
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? George
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jan Dvorak
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Bill Nottingham
- non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc... Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did ... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where ... Ben Ford
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: W... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was R... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was R... Tim Riker