thly engineering views in Launchpad:
https://dev.launchpad.net/Projects/WorkItems
Cheers,
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
g to
> ignore it" :-)
I'm sure it's a common use case and there are more people who would
appreciate to have a view like that in LP.
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Hi Ricardo,
On 02/02/12 05:28, Mattias Backman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Ricardo Salveti
> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Guilherme Salgado
>> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> We're trying to make sta
Ooops, I meant to CC the infrastructure list instead of linaro-dev the
email below.
On 17/01/12 15:44, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 17/01/12 12:31, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Hello Guilherme,
Here's the matter about "WI" we have from the team meeting. I posted
ab
o.org/Process/UpstreamPatches
In that case you'll also want to ask for the creation of a new project
on patches.l.o (instructions also on the page above)
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Hi Ryan,
I'm replying with a copy to linaro-dev@ as I believe adding support to
UEFI into l-m-c will require a new hwpack format, which is something
that needs discussion with a wider audience.
On 11/01/12 13:51, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> Hi Danilo,
>
> Ok, as we agreed, I've had a hack at the l-m-c
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 10:34 +, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 03:22:00PM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > The linux-arm-kernel[1] project on patches.l.o was using the following
> > source
> > tree
> >
> > htt
x27; tree?
[1] http://patches.linaro.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.o
t's probably simpler and much nicer to just show the
hwpack+rootfs versions on a tooltip when the mouse hovers over one of
the points on a given line.
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
ently closed)
> https://review.source.android.com//#dashboard,1002471
>
> Is there any problem for stat? Or, can I help to improve it?
>
> Thanks,
> -jserv
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
broken. When I try to log in, I get this:
>
> OpenID failed
>
> OpenID discovery error: Error fetching XRDS document: (28, 'connect()
> timed out!')
>
> This has been happening for about 2 days, but it was working prior to that.
>
> Cheers
> ---Dave
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:23 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 07:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
>
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > We can use powerdebug as a guinea pig for this and if it works fine we
> > can do it for others. Do you know who we should talk to in
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 16:38 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 02:45 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 00:16 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 06/15/2011 03:26 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>>
> >&
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 00:16 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 03:26 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to
> > set it up and get accurate metrics. It should take only a few
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 13:25 +0300, Alexandros Frantzis wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:26:57AM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to
> > set it up and get accurate metrics
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 16:44 +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > And there's a form at the bottom which allows them to be moved to the
> > appropriate project. If we're missing a project just let me know and
> > I'll create it.
>
how we can improve this,
please do let us know.
[1] If it's just slightly different but from the same author we can
still match them
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
o do is to ignore patches sent there
it's fine, for simplicity's sake, for you all to continue CCing patches
sent there to patches@l.o -- we'll just ignore them when generating
stats).
Cheers,
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Descript
My SD card was good and udisks --inhibit didn't help. This should
happen consistently if you don't run l-a-m-c as root
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools/+bug/789093
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 07:58 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Guil
urnValue: Sub process
"['sudo', '-E', 'mv', '/tmp/tmpBKxAwJ/userdata-disc']" returned a non-zero
value: 1
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
f results per page avoids that timeout. To do so,
just append an extra "&batch=20" to the URL above:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=arm-porting-queue&batch=20
[1] https://launchpad.net/bugs/735977
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
ry.
>
> We decided that we would pregenerate one image size with some free
> space that can be directly written to an SD card.
But when compressed the free space doesn't make any difference, does it?
I've gzipped a 2GB desktop image last week and it went down to around
5
buntuDesktop at this
point, so we might as well avoid the extra work to provide images that
are unlikely to be of any use.
Can anybody think of other reasons why we should provide images of all
types?
[1] https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Specs/PrebuiltImages
--
Guilherme Salgado &l
t you
mentioned in your previous message. The one there is not specific to
multimedia, but we can either change it or add one that is.
>
> On 4 May 2011 15:43, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 15:32 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> >> Hmm...actually I was thinkin
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 08:26 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 03:12 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> >>
15:26, Michael Hope wrote:
> > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Michael,
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 03:12 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> >>>
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 03:12 +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > If you do, I need to know more about how you'd like to use them, to make
> > sure we provide something that is suitable to everyone.
&g
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 09:37 -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Several people have suggested that we should start providing prebuilt
> > Linaro images for those who can't/won't ins
, don't forget to subscribe to
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro/+spec/linaro-platforms-o-prebuilt-images
Cheers,
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
'd like to participate in the discussion at LDS, don't
forget to subscribe to the blueprint[2] on Launchpad.
Cheers,
[1]
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Specs/RemoteDevelopmentBoards
[2]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava/+spec/linaro-platforms-o-remote-developent-b
-1.amazonaws.com/project/gcc-patches/list/
But I assume that's not everything you want so our long term goal should
be to have the features you need implemented directly into the system,
although in the meantime we could have them implemented as separate
tools, using our system as a data source
cheaply for you though, as I would agree that one
> > place to do all this would be good.
>
> This case is currently sufficiently uncommon that I can probably live
> with out of band tracking via wiki page if necessary. It would be nice
> to know whether it's a '2 ho
ically nor where my credentials properly filled out in my
> browser.
In order to have patches associated with the logged in user, we need the
user's email address, which is only sent by the Launchpad Login Service
to certain authorized consumer sites. I didn't want to add that ec2
hos
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 16:01 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 April 2011 15:45, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
>
> > - Not all of your patches may be shown under /user/submitted. if that's
> > the case, make sure all your email addresses are registered in Launchpad
> > as
27;s a form at the bottom of every patch
list which allow you to do that).
- in other cases it's because we're missing a project in patchwork. if
that's the case we can register that project and there's a script
which runs periodically and will move these patch
ng quick tutorial
> * perf demos
> * Toolchain performance benchmarks
> * Video codec performance benchmarks
> * Demos of new QEMU targets
> * linaro-media-create quick tutorial
I'm happy to give the l-m-c tutorial. Do I need to signup somewhere or
is this enough?
Cheers
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 09:56 -0700, Andy Doan wrote:
> On 03/22/2011 08:05 AM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > That's to decide whether we should count the patches that belong to a
> > series individually or not.
> >
>
> Could you generate two sets of stats lik
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 13:25 -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> That wiki page[1] gave me a good overview of the build service; I have
> only a couple questions.
>
> Also, even though I didn't actually read most of the code, I saw some
> shell script to
a merge proposal to [...]
I guess that means the jenkins job created under the hoods will always
use the tip of the build-tools branch, avoiding the need for a manual
update?
Cheers,
[1]https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHudson/Sandbox/LinaroAndroidBuildService
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 18:24 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 18 March 2011 23:29, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > I'm currently working on the PatchTracking[1] spec and, wrt patch
> > series, I'm wondering whether you consider the patches that are part of
> > a s
chTracking
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:30 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > My concern is that sfdisk -l returning non-zero may not be a very good
> > indication that we should sleep. It will return non-zero on any error
> > and I expect most
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:14 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > Do we know why this happens in some cases? It'd be better if we could
> > only sleep when we know there's a chance that the partitions may be
> > available
ome messages on the console.
>
> Guilherme, what do you think?
Do we know why this happens in some cases? It'd be better if we could
only sleep when we know there's a chance that the partitions may be
available after that.
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://la
delay=1 fixrtc nocompcache '
>
> ___
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
De
linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
>
>
> _______
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signa
__
> >> linaro-dev mailing list
> >> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> >> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
> >
> >
> > ___
> > linaro-dev mailing list
> > linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> >
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 15:59 -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> I've been using the sendemail.cc config as well, but unfortunately it is
> not used by stgit. If you use stgit to send patches you'll have to
> copy /usr/share/stgit/templates/patchmail.tmpl to ~/.stgit an
ens in a single git
> tree, you could do the following:
>
> $ cd
> $ git config --add sendemail.bcc "patc...@linaro.org"
>
> Check /.git/config for the bcc entry as above.
> Now patches send from that tree will be bcc'ed to patches@linaro.
>
> /Ami
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 20:30 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 February 2011 19:53, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > Ok, so ISTM that to keep this solution working we'll need to do
> > something like running qemu-arm-static with no arguments and parse its
> > output fo
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 16:55 +, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 7 February 2011 16:50, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > In lmc we already have some code which checks if a given utility is
> > present and if not, install (via apt-get) a package which provides that.
> > We could
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 08:14 +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > In lmc we already have some code which checks if a given utility is
> > present and if not, install (via apt-get) a package which provides that.
>
> (
gt; Thoughts?
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > Hi Aneesh,
> >
> > Do you have the latest qemu-user-static from
> > https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/tools ?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 19:55 +053
o/headless/linaro-natty-headless-
> tar-20110206-0.tar.gz --hwpack /home/a0393566local/linaro/hwpack
> /hwpack_linaro-panda_20110206-0_armel_supported.tar.gz --dev panda
>
> However, it crashes immediately with the following dump:
> http://pastebin.com/SV78dP8L
--
Guilherme Sa
input. Shouldn't
> >> it be the last console added in the list?
> >
> > Bug #710971, multiply-reported and actively being worked on via IRC.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> How about the 2nd issue - overriding using --console. I believe that
> value be appended at the
gt;
> proxy.mydomain.com is of course an alias for our internal proxy.
>
> > --
> > Christian Robottom Reis | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | http://launchpad.net/~kiko
> > Linaro Engineering VP | [ +1] 612 216 4935 | http://async.com.br/~kiko
> >
>
> __
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 13:54 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > This looks good to me. The only thing I can think of right now is to
> > also add the board name to the hwpack meta-data and consider dropping
> > the --dev option (m
tly, but I wasn't considering
breaking l-m-c for old hwpacks.
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
ng I can think of right now is to
also add the board name to the hwpack meta-data and consider dropping
the --dev option (making it optional, in fact, so that it keeps working
with hwpacks in the current format) which should no longer be needed
once all the board-specific options are in the hwpack.
2010-12-23 14:32:28 +
> @@ -256,7 +256,6 @@
>
> python -m media_create.ensure_command mkimage uboot-mkimage
> python -m media_create.ensure_command uuidgen uuid-runtime
> -python -m media_create.ensure_command parted parted
> case "$
tch' microSD card has given up the ghost, but I thought
> I'd ask here before I run out and buy another one.
>
> Cheers,
> mwh
>
> PS: can you buy non-crappy microSD cards in multi-packs anywhere?
>
> _______
> linaro-
s.
>
> And there is an long waiting time after the following line, could we add
> some process information during it?
>
> Unpacking hardware pack ...Done
>
> Reading package lists... Done
>
Sure thing. Care to file a bug about it? FTR, that's when it&#
Forgot to mention that there's one new dependency which you may need to
install in case you don't have it yet: python-parted
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 10:00 -0200, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Some of you may not be aware of this, but linaro-media-create is
> u
e
version we currently have in Ubuntu when there are regressions.
Cheers,
[1]
<https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Infrastructure/Specs/ImproveLinaroMediaCreate>
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Descriptio
00 40 01 00 00 c0 7e 00
> 0020 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 0030 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>
> (BC is the number of cylinders for the boot partition. The only
> constraint here is that the partition must be unambiguo
arted (which I'm using indirectly via python-parted) allows you to
specify the geometry of a partition in sectors, but it has an awful and
undocumented API, so I couldn't get it to make a partition that my xM
can boot. I guess we'll have to live with [s]fdisk for some time still,
no longer
using parted, but I was wondering if you were able to use parted to
change the geometry in the partition table to 255heads/63sectors as the
boot rom seems to require?
I ask because I'm working on converting our script to python and it'd be
nice if I could use python-par
here, and I was able to create an image
using the alip tarball. However, I'm using the latest
linaro-media-create from lp:linaro-image-tools. Can you give that a
try? https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/MilestoneBuilds has the
instructions
>
> -Praveen
>
> -Original Message
p? It'd be nice if
you could pastebin them.
> I am not sure whether I am using right build images, can anyone point
> me to the working build images for vexpress platform.
The tarballs you used should've worked, I think.
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
dentifier: 0x00042b57
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/mmcblk0p1 * 1 9 72261c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
> /dev/mmcblk0p2 10 481 3791340 83 Linux
>
> Any clue?
>
> Thanks,
> Ira
>
I thought this would be a simple question about integrating xdeb with
sbuild but as it turns out there are other things here that could
benefit from being discussed with a bigger audience, so I'm CCing
linaro-dev.
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 21:30 +, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Guilherme Salgado
trol.
However, given that the deadline is very close, the alternative you
propose above might be acceptable if the API is served over HTTPS.
>
> Having said that I'd like to propose my opinion:
>
> 1) Postpone oauth for UDS milestone (7 days left)
> 2) Work on altern
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:44 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado
> wrote:
> > a) unpack the binary tarball to a tmp dir, install the hwpack (which
> > may cause lots of data to be written) and then move that to the SD card
> &g
x27;s the time
to tell me. :)
Cheers,
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
x27;s the time
to tell me. :)
Cheers,
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 17:03 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > qemu: hardware error: no boot device found
>
> Could you share the QEMU cmdline you're using and which version of QEMU
> you're using?
>
> This error
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 09:22 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 05:03:55PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > > qemu: hardware error: no boot device found
>
> > Could you share the QEMU cmdline you&#x
it
on the list.
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 17:03 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> > qemu: hardware error: no boot device found
>
> Could you share the QEMU cmdline you're using and which version of QEMU
> you're using?
I used
This didn't happen when I used an older tarball, so I guess it was a
problem with yesterday's one.
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 17:41 -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've followed the instructions on
> <https://wiki.linaro.org/Source/ImageInstallation>
Aborted
That was using today's daily headless tarball, btw.
Any ideas what's wrong?
--
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
linaro-
you happy to continue working on this, or would you like
> me to carry on your work?
>
I'm more than happy to continue working on this. I'm hoping to land the
new linaro-hwpack-install script today and then I can work on
linaro-media-create to make use of that.
--
Guil
81 matches
Mail list logo
