On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 13:54 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > > This looks good to me. The only thing I can think of right now is to > > also add the board name to the hwpack meta-data and consider dropping > > the --dev option (making it optional, in fact, so that it keeps working > > with hwpacks in the current format) which should no longer be needed > > once all the board-specific options are in the hwpack. > > What would we do with the board name?
Right now I don't have a use-case for it, but at the same time that I want to make the --dev argument not needed (after all, the user already specifies the hwpack for a specific board, so there's no point in forcing them to specify that yet again), I don't want to lose that information, and it kind of makes sense to me to have hwpacks specify the boards they're made for in a structured format rather than just on their file names. -- Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
