On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 10:34 +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 03:22:00PM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > The linux-arm-kernel[1] project on patches.l.o was using the following > > source > > tree > > > > http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/kernel/git-cur/linux-2.6-arm.git > > > > to track committed patches, but fetching that repo seems to have become > > ridiculously slow, causing git to take ages to update the local copy or get > > a > > new one. So I'm wondering if there's any mirror of that repo (served via > > HTTP as we can't fetch git:// URLs from the machine that runs patches.l.o) > > somewhere with a bigger pipe? If not, would it be ok to change the source > > tree of linux-arm-kernel to Linus' tree? > > Most people seem to be experiencing problems with this tree just now. > > The correct result is that the check for merges in rmk's tree should return > no result in this case -- we simply don't know what is merged in there. > Can you time it out (or just temporarily turn off fetching of that tree)?
I've turned it off for now as I couldn't find a way to specify a timeout for git. > > Fetching torvalds/master twice doesn't really give us any more useful > information than fetching it once. We only look for the patches sent to the linux-arm-kernel list on RMK's tree; what I was proposing was to look for them on torvalds/master instead (for the time being), but if torvalds can't merge from that tree either, it won't buy us anything. Cheers, -- Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
