On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:14 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > > Do we know why this happens in some cases? It'd be better if we could > > only sleep when we know there's a chance that the partitions may be > > available after that. > > I'm not sure what you're asking; are you asking for a test on whether > we need to sleep? That's sfdisk -l, as I do in the script before > sleeping
My concern is that sfdisk -l returning non-zero may not be a very good indication that we should sleep. It will return non-zero on any error and I expect most errors to not go away after a 30 seconds sleep, in which case we'd be delaying l-m-c's exit unnecessarily. That may not be a big deal, though. -- Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
