On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 15:13 -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> This time with the attachment :)
> 
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Paul Larson <paul.lar...@linaro.org>
> wrote:
>         I started working on a results view in LAVA for the bootchart
>         results since they are now part of the daily runs.  This is
>         using a partial copy of the data I have locally, so please
>         don't concern yourself too much with the actual data in it.  A
>         couple of things to point out:
>         
>         1. legend is not placed well, that's something I'm not yet
>         sure how to fix as my javascript-fu is lacking here (zyga, any
>         ideas on this?)

By the looks of it, I suspect you're using the flot plugin for jquery to
generate the chart. If that's the case, to the best of my knowledge, all
you can do (easily) is place the legend on any of the four corners of
the chart, so in your case it might be best to place it on the bottom
right (se).  You can achieve that by adding

  legend: {position: "se"}

to the options argument you pass to $.plot()

But once we make nano boot faster its line will overlap with the legend.

>         2. The set of results here is not very large.  That's
>         adjustable and when it's using live data, should have a lot
>         more data points to better see trends
>         3. This is purposefully restricted to a single board.  We are
>         not running benchmarks in a controlled enough manner as to
>         make comparison of boards to one another reasonable, nor is it
>         encouraged due to the collaborative nature of Linaro.
>         
>         
>         In particular I'm looking for opinions on how it would be most
>         useful to display this data.  This view shows all 4 image
>         types on a single chart.  I did a previous version that had
>         them separate.  Is there a preference? It would also be easy
>         to do both on the same page, but perhaps a bit redundant.

I assume the dates refer to when the test was run? I wonder if it
wouldn't be better to use the date the hwpack/rootfs was built instead.
That way we can easily see what hwpack/rootfs made it faster/slower
without having to dig what hwpack+rootfs combination was used on a given
date. Actually, it's probably simpler and much nicer to just show the
hwpack+rootfs versions on a tooltip when the mouse hovers over one of
the points on a given line.

-- 
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Reply via email to