Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
> I actually wrote the instructions on the wiki above. but you need to use the
> full bzr+ssh:// link
as I put on the wiki. i have not been able to use shorthand link using
lp: type of link.
If you have the http_proxy environment variable set to something that
allows out
+++ Steve Langasek [2011-01-31 12:18 -0800]:
> > So, the questions is - which of these is the correct fix:
> > 1) make dpkg-cross copy over symlinks even when they point into
> > /usr/share
> > 2) make tcl8.5 put tclConfig.sh in /usr/lib/tcl8.5 instead of
> > /usr/share/tcltk/tcl8.5
> > 3) make sql
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 01:04:45AM +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> I just tried to create an SD image for the beagle with l-m-c from bzr.
> The kernel command-line ends up containing 'console=tty0
> console=NONE,115200n8'. Board configuration problem?
> Overriding l-m-c with --console ttyO2 doesn't
Hi,
I just tried to create an SD image for the beagle with l-m-c from bzr.
The kernel command-line ends up containing 'console=tty0
console=NONE,115200n8'. Board configuration problem?
Overriding l-m-c with --console ttyO2 doesn't work since it is added
before the other consoles, so doesn't end u
This patch implements an alternate method for using device tree data
for populating machine device registration. Traditionally, board
support has directly generated and registered devices based on nodes
in the device tree. The board support code starts at the root of the
tree and begins allocatin
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:28:35 +0100, Ken Werner wrote:
> On Monday, January 31, 2011 5:45:28 pm Tom Gall wrote:
> > Hi Ken,
> >
> > FWIW I'm running fairly recent linaro images on my pandaboard with success.
> >
> > hwpack in my case was from 0119.
> >
> > Your boot log looks pretty much like mi
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> This patch implements an alternate method for using device tree data
> for populating machine device registration. Traditionally, board
> support has directly generated and registered devices based on nodes
> in the device tree. The board su
Hi,
Since we use Launchpad so much within Linaro this may be of interest to
some.
I am the Launchpad stakeholder representative for Linaro, so if you wish
to request any features or escalate any bugs then please feel free to
talk to me.
Thanks,
James
--- Begin Message ---
We've made some chan
Hi Wookey,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:16:15PM +, Wookey wrote:
> Debian policy (8.2) says:
> ---
> It is recommended that supporting files and run-time support programs
> that do not need to be invoked manually by users, but are nevertheless
> required for the package to function,
(please drop cc's other than debian-policy in replies if you want to
work on that)
Hi Wookey,
Wookey wrote:
> Debian policy (8.2) says:
> ---
> It is recommended that supporting files and run-time support programs
> that do not need to be invoked manually by users, but are neverthele
For this specific tcl issue, there was some discussion in Debian
#599206; I didn't comment back on the bug, but I liked Goswin's
proposal
--
Loïc Minier
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo
On Monday, January 31, 2011 5:45:28 pm Tom Gall wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> FWIW I'm running fairly recent linaro images on my pandaboard with success.
>
> hwpack in my case was from 0119.
>
> Your boot log looks pretty much like mine does, warnings and all.
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the info. First I thou
Hi Avik,
Would you be willing to try the instructions I created for this at:
https://wiki.linaro.org/Mentoring/KernelDeploy
Especially the section labeled:
#Deploying the kernel to the SD card
These instructions worked on my Overo board.
--Matt
On 01/31/2011 03:57 AM, Avik Sil wrote:
> Hi,
>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:35:45PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > 4. make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- menuconfig (enabled
> > EARLY_PRINTK)
> > 5. make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- uImage
> > 6. make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- modules
> > 7. make ARCH=
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> On 01/31/2011 10:28 AM, thomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote:
>>
>> From: Thomas Abraham
>>
>> Add support for retrieving memory and irq resource information
>> from device tree for Samsung's SDHCI controller driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:34:30PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Just a thought--- is it worth experimenting with running the kernel wg
> > meeting on IRC instead of the conf call?
> >
> > Personally, I find IRC meetings _much_ more
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Just a thought--- is it worth experimenting with running the kernel wg
> meeting on IRC instead of the conf call?
>
> Personally, I find IRC meetings _much_ more digestible than conf calls
> (better "audio quality"; ability to scroll back w
tcl8.5-dev contains /usr/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh
which is a symlink pointing to /usr/share/tcltk/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh
Currently dpkg-cross only copies symlinks across when crossing a
package if the symlink points to somewhere within /lib. symlinks
outside /lib are ignored because they are not arch-
Thomas,
On 01/31/2011 10:28 AM, thomas.abra...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Thomas Abraham
Add support for retrieving memory and irq resource information
from device tree for Samsung's SDHCI controller driver.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
---
The modification will be made more generic to support
Hi there,
Just a thought--- is it worth experimenting with running the kernel wg
meeting on IRC instead of the conf call?
Personally, I find IRC meetings _much_ more digestible than conf calls
(better "audio quality"; ability to scroll back when you don't hear /
don't understand something etc.),
Hi Ken,
FWIW I'm running fairly recent linaro images on my pandaboard with success.
hwpack in my case was from 0119.
Your boot log looks pretty much like mine does, warnings and all.
Regards,
Tom
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ken Werner wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> When booting linaro snapshots
> > Please help me figuring out the problem. Is it because I didn't create
> > uInitrd? If so, then how to create it for ARM?
> I believe you're right.
Em, not necessarily... I used both hand-made and distribution-made
Linaro kernels with Linaro filesystem but without initrd. And it did
complain a
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:28 AM, wrote:
> From: Thomas Abraham
>
> Add support for retrieving memory and irq resource information
> from device tree for Samsung's SDHCI controller driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
> ---
>
> The modification will be made more generic to support both
> DT
Hi there,
When booting linaro snapshots on my PandaBoard the system hangs a few seconds
after the bash prompt is shown (sometimes a little earlier). My first step was
to enable magic-sysrq but the system doesn't react on them. It looks like it's
already powered off - very strange. I've tried va
From: Thomas Abraham
Add support for retrieving memory and irq resource information
from device tree for Samsung's SDHCI controller driver.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham
---
The modification will be made more generic to support both
DT and non-DT versions of the driver without the #ifdef's.
Fo
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Avik Sil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried booting linux-linaro-2.6.37 kernel on my beagle board C4. I executed
> following:
>
> 1. Installed linaro on a 4 GB SD card using linaro-image-tools 0.4.1 with
> hwpack daily snapshot hwpack_linaro-omap3_20110125-0_armel_supported.
We should try this in the Linaro Cambridge office...
Dave
On 31 Jan 2011, at 11:47, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
>> My office was getting a bit messy so I re-purposed an old PC case and
>> mounted my ARM boards, a switch, and far too many power suppl
[Forwarding this to linaro-dev too ... should have sent it there in
the first place! ---Dave]
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Martin
Date: Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:52 AM
Subject: Generating ancilliary sections with gas
To: linaro-toolchain
Hi all,
With gas, does anyone know
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
> My office was getting a bit messy so I re-purposed an old PC case and
> mounted my ARM boards, a switch, and far too many power supplies into
> it:
> http://people.linaro.org/~michaelh/racked/IMG_20110131_145444.jpg
Neat. But you've got roo
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Avik Sil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried booting linux-linaro-2.6.37 kernel on my beagle board C4. I executed
> following:
>
> 1. Installed linaro on a 4 GB SD card using linaro-image-tools 0.4.1 with
> hwpack daily snapshot hwpack_linaro-omap3_20110125-0_armel_supported
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > 3. make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- omap2plus_defconfig
> this one feels odd as beagle is omap3
That's actually correct; omap2plus is meant to support OMAP2, OMAP3 and
OMAP4 in the same binary kernel (OMAP2+)
--
Loïc Minier
___
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Avik Sil wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried booting linux-linaro-2.6.37 kernel on my beagle board C4. I executed
>> following:
>>
>> 1. Installed linaro on a 4 GB SD card using linaro-image-tools 0.4.1 with
>> hw
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Avik Sil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried booting linux-linaro-2.6.37 kernel on my beagle board C4. I executed
> following:
>
> 1. Installed linaro on a 4 GB SD card using linaro-image-tools 0.4.1 with
> hwpack daily snapshot hwpack_linaro-omap3_20110125-0_armel_supported
Hi Avik,
On 01/31/2011 11:57 AM, Avik Sil wrote:
> 7. make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- modules_install
> INSTALL_MOD_PATH=/media/rootfs
>
> 8. cp arch/arm/boot/uImage /media/boot; sync
>
> Everything went on smoothly. Then I put the SD card on BB and powered
> it on. I got a kernel p
Hi,
I tried booting linux-linaro-2.6.37 kernel on my beagle board C4. I executed
following:
1. Installed linaro on a 4 GB SD card using linaro-image-tools 0.4.1 with
hwpack daily snapshot hwpack_linaro-omap3_20110125-0_armel_supported.tar.gz
and linaro-natty-headless-tar-20101202-1.tar.gz. It was
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Michael Opdenacker
wrote:
> On 01/28/2011 06:40 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
>> Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
>> Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on January 26th
>> in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 15:00
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:11:03 +0100, Loïc Minier
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
>> > What do you mean by stuff? Configs? Generically useful scripts?
>> > Although I'm not really sure how much of the
Yong,
Idea of defining various C states is to get maximum power savings both
active and inactive usecases.
C states you defined below are definitely good as a starting point.
May be you can define more C states by adding more granularity
depending on what are controlled as part of CPUIdle.
Eg: In
Hi there,
I am trying to implement cpuidle driver for imx51, and for better
understanding how various c-state map to ARM soc,
I would like to get some comments.
First of all, we basically have 3 major state for imx51, which are defined
in specification of the soc. Like:
RUN - Core is active, cloc
39 matches
Mail list logo
