This usually happens when something is not the default way:
- you have other TeX installed on the machine (MikTeX is known to work
together with lilypond, but other distributions are not)
- you have some other HOME directory in cygwin.
Please run
bash -x /etc/lilypond-profile.sh
and then
li
hi graham, robert,
i had this as well.
han-wen made the suggestion you'll find below which remedied it, although i believe it's intended to be a temporary work-around.
best,
sean
Sean Reed
Hamburg, Germany
Web: www.seanreed.de
Begin forwarded message
On Dienstag 10 Mai 2005 22:34, Ralph Little wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed Lily 2.4.5 from tarball onto a Gentoo system.
> However, all the output (including the doc examples) have only basic font
> rendering. The fonts have funny spacing and it looks like it isn't linking
> to decent fonts. Diffi
I have seen this notation too in transcriptions of vihuela music. I
guess it wouldn't be too difficult to implement. Maybe you would need a
different notation for a "mobile dot" (e.g. d4*).
/Bernard
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> You could always play with
> \once \override Dots #'extra-offse
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> Is it possible to define a \markup macro that looks like a lilypond
>> command?
>> This produces the output I want:
>> \version "2.5.23"
>> #(def-markup-command (tempoMark layout props str) (markup?)
>> (interpret-markup la
I'm afraid Alois answer isn't that relevant.
Did you install the ec-fonts-mftraced package?
Is it only a problem with text fonts or are the note heads and
other music symbols also affected?
If you want more accurate help from the mailing list, rather than
wild guesses, I recommend to use 'lilypond
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to define a \markup macro that looks like a lilypond
> command?
>
> This produces the output I want:
>
> \version "2.5.23"
> #(def-markup-command (tempoMark layout props str) (markup?)
>(interpret-markup layout props
> (markup #
On 11-May-05, at 2:42 AM, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
{
\tempoMark \markup Allegro
c'
}
You can not get rid of the explicit "\markup", though.
As long as you only want text you can; use a (string?)
\version "2.5.23"
\layout {
\context { \Score \remove "Mark_engraver" }
\context { \Staff \consists
Sean Reed wrote:
hi graham, robert,
i had this as well.
han-wen made the suggestion you'll find below which remedied it,
although i believe it's intended to be a temporary work-around.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25. April 2005 21:25:07 MESZ
cd $HOM
I don't know whether the expression "French slur" or "sostenuto slur"
does exist in English; what I mean is the following:
A slur which is appended to a single note, but does not lead anywhere.
It is used e.g. in guitar notation in order to indicate that a note
shall last longer than until the nex
Well, at least it's clear from
http://www.answers.com/topic/ornament-music?hl=inverted&hl=mordent
that there's quite some confusion when it comes to naming.
Using the nomenclature of that article, the \prall in LilyPond is
an upper mordent and the \mordent in LilyPond is a lower mordent.
This is no
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 09:39 am, Laura Conrad wrote:
>
> Do we have a way to put the barline between the notehead and the dot?
> It's fairly common in modern mensurstriche editions, and the later
> Dowland facsimiles that I'm transcribing these days do it as well.
It's interesting, to me anyway,
slasub.py is a very convenient means of passing
arguments to lilypond commands. It uses per cents
as placeholders in the substituted text, so you
can use something like $mv(-1 2). daveA
http://www.openguitar.com/files/slasub.py
--
The only technical exercises for all guitarists worth a lifetim
> As for "guitar fret numbers"... how should I rephrase it?
"Guitar position, barring indications, or other text with a spanner"
It's just markup text, and the spanner is great. It's right half
spanner only, correct? It's not customary to center those, any
more than you would "ten". d
> "HN" == Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
HN> Laura Conrad wrote:
>> Do we have a way to put the barline between the notehead and the dot?
HN> No. You have to fake it with transparent notes, I guess.
Well, for the moment, I just left out the barline, but I think it's
Also, I realized later that I should have been more precise with what
the composer's intent is.
The notehead should be on the b and the performer's articulation is b
c b as a triplet. So what I wish to ask of lilypond is to make:
b\articulation
... show a 'mordent with a slash' above the 'b' no
Use the trick from the example called tie-cross-voice.ly in the
Tips and Tricks document for your version of LilyPond at
www.lilypond.org.
/Mats
Malte Milatz wrote:
I don't know whether the expression "French slur" or "sostenuto slur"
does exist in English; what I mean is the following:
A slur w
Robert T Wyatt wrote:
2.5.23 MacOS 10.3.9
Hi!
I have some questions relating to the file enclosed below.
1) First, a possible bug: My glissando in the first measure dissappeared
(but the gliss between measures 11/12 is present). I think it happened
when I implemented the voltas (please correct m
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 03:54 am, Bernard Hurley wrote:
> I have seen this notation too in transcriptions of vihuela music. I
> guess it wouldn't be too difficult to implement. Maybe you would need
a
> different notation for a "mobile dot" (e.g. d4*).
This would make a lot of sense: d2 d4\dot,
Hi there all you Mac OS X Tiger users.
Does anyone of you know of a metadata importer for lilypond files?
Because currently they are not indexed.
The documents from Apple tell how to do it, but since my c classes are
12 years ago, I'm very rusty in this area. So if someone has already
done an im
Title: Message
Hi
I'm getting the
following two problems when installing Lilypond:
When installing, it
stops and indicates "No Package" when it gets to
"/etc/postinstall/post_texmf.sh"
If I try to run the
test, I get:
GNU LilyPond
2.4.3/usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-13.scm:159:1: In p
On May 10, 2005, at 8:34 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On 10-May-05, at 3:20 PM, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
I don't know if it is me or a bug but dynamic marks are not pretty
italic fonts, rather they are big ugly fonts:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/
Dynamics.html
Mats wrote:
>I didn't find any Scheme function that can be used within a
\layout{\context{...}} to read the current value
>of a context property.
>
>/Mats
>
>Graham Percival wrote:
>> Can I specify something like
>> #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 5 8) 3 8)
>>
>> in a \layout{ \conte
First install can take up to 15-30 minutes. You can check in Task
Manager if there are running processes. (That has a CPU utilization > 10 %)
Bert
When installing, it stops and indicates "No Package" when it gets to
"/etc/postinstall/post_texmf.sh"
If I try to run the test, I get:
GNU LilyPo
Hi!
I have a line like this:
e8([ cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b)]
and lilypond complains with
diabeli.op149.22.ly:67:38: warning: No slur to end:
e8([ cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-1 d8-2 b
)]
and the slur starting at the first e8 ends at
If you haven't heard about it on this list, I suspect nobody has done
one yet. I'll take it under advisement that there's a desire for this.
One temporary solution: the easiest way to tell OS X that your .ly
files are text files is to set their HFS metadata type attribute like
so (assuming a
> e8([ cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b)]
Try
e8[( cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b])
i.e. reverse the order of [ and ( and ] and )
(Don't have access to lily right now, but pretty sure that will do the
trick.)
David.
>
> and lilypond complains with
>
> diabeli.op149.22.ly:67:38: war
At 5:47 PM +0200 5/11/05, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
3) I need to move a lot of my chords left an eighth note. That is,
the correct pattern is largely 3/8, 5/8. I'm still trying to figure
out how to implement this well (do I need to use--a plethora
of--silent rests?--shudder at the thought). Also, I
On 11-May-05, at 2:20 PM, David Sanders wrote:
e8([ cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b)]
Try
e8[( cis-3 \acciaccatura e8-5 d8-4 b])
Since an \acc creates a slur, you can't have another slur happening
at the same time. Use a phrasing slur for your longer slur.
Cheers,
- Graham
_
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Robert T Wyatt wrote:
2.5.23 MacOS 10.3.9
1) First, a possible bug: My glissando in the first measure
dissappeared (but the gliss between measures 11/12 is present). I
think it happened when I implemented the voltas (please correct my
pluralization if I have it wrong). Lily
Robert T Wyatt wrote:
2.5.23 MacOS 10.3.9
> 4) I wish to move the volta braces above the chords.
Is this still the only known solution to this question?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2002-09/msg00297.html
___
lilypond-user mailing list
31 matches
Mail list logo
