Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to define a \markup macro that looks like a lilypond
> command?
>
> This produces the output I want:
>
> \version "2.5.23"
> #(def-markup-command (tempoMark layout props str) (markup?)
> (interpret-markup layout props
> (markup #:bold #:large str)))
> \relative c'' {
> c4^\markup{ \tempoMark Allegro }
> }
>
> I'm wondering if I can alter the syntax so the command is used like
> this:
>
> \relative c'' {
> c4^\tempoMark{ Allegro }
> }
Han-Wen has answered your question.
However, for that particular example, you can define a function that
builds a \mark.
\layout {
\context { \Score \remove "Mark_engraver" }
\context { \Staff \consists "Mark_engraver" }
}
tempoMark = #(def-music-function (parser location markp) (markup?)
#{ \once \override Staff . RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #-1
\once \override Staff . RehearsalMark #'no-spacing-rods = ##t
%% eventually, some other overrides here
\mark \markup { \bold \italic $markp } #})
{
\tempoMark \markup Allegro
c'
}
You can not get rid of the explicit "\markup", though.
nicolas
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
