at.
>
> Unfortunately, that can't be true, as with this interpretation, the
> measure is over-full. Rather, the groups of quintuplets/triplets continue,
> with a beaming not in sync with the measure's beat structure.
>
> This also implies that the original engraving isn't ma
be true, as with this interpretation, the
measure is over-full. Rather, the groups of quintuplets/triplets
continue, with a beaming not in sync with the measure's beat structure.
This also implies that the original engraving isn't mathematically
correct (as the beginnings of the bems g
ather, the groups of quintuplets/triplets
continue, with a beaming not in sync with the measure's beat structure.
This also implies that the original engraving isn't mathematically
correct (as the beginnings of the bems groups look as if they're
aligned). Situations like that are
Knute,
Sort of off topic, yet if a rhythmic structure cannot be “felt” why is it
written?
Mark
From: Knute Snortum
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2023 6:56 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets
Okay, if I code
nt:* Tuesday, December 26, 2023 4:06 PM
> *To:* lilypond-user@gnu.org
> *Subject:* Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets
>
>
>
> I'm having difficulties with a Scriabin etude I'm trying to engrave. I've
> attached an image of the first few bars. The cha
@gnu.org
Subject: Aligning offset quintuplets and triplets
I'm having difficulties with a Scriabin etude I'm trying to engrave. I've
attached an image of the first few bars. The challenge is that the first notes
of the offset quintuplets and triples should line up at the b
e snippet below
alings the notes at the start of the measure and is "mathematically"
correct, but the notes at the beginning of the beamed quintuplets and
triplets do not align.
\version "2.24.3"
rightHand = \relative {
r2 \tuplet 5/4 4 { r8. e'16[ e e e e] e[ e |
e
Joseph Srednicki writes:
> Hi David:
> Thanks for answering my inquiry about beaming 16th-note triplets.
> However, it looks provided an example in a file called "js.ly" that
> was scrubbed as indicated below.
> If the example is not too long and it's not too
Hi David:
Thanks for answering my inquiry about beaming 16th-note triplets.
However, it looks provided an example in a file called "js.ly" that was
scrubbed as indicated below.
If the example is not too long and it's not too much trouble, can you reply
pasting the content of &quo
Joseph Srednicki writes:
> Hello:
>
> The tiny example below contains a bar of sixteenth-note triplets in
> 6/8 time. In this example, I used the "[" and "]" characters to
> achieve the desired beaming manually.
>
> Instead of using the "[" an
Hello:
The tiny example below contains a bar of sixteenth-note triplets in 6/8 time.
In this example, I used the "[" and "]" characters to achieve the desired
beaming manually.
Instead of using the "[" and "]" characters, what is the correct code to se
Thank you who replied. Sometime "soon" I will update
Lilypond but I will not reply further unless this fails...
Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2022-06-27 6:18 am, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>> The LSR runs LilyPond 2.22 and you have 2.18. You need to upgrade
>> LilyPond. Frescobaldi makes it easy to use several versions in
>> parallel.
>
> As far as I can see, the LSR only notes the current version in
> Contributing
On 2022-06-27 6:18 am, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
The LSR runs LilyPond 2.22 and you have 2.18. You need to upgrade
LilyPond. Frescobaldi makes it easy to use several versions in
parallel.
As far as I can see, the LSR only notes the current version in
Contributing [1].
[1]: https://lsr.di.unimi.
Le 27/06/2022 à 13:26, mark damerell a écrit :
It came from:
%% http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=328
Here is part of it:
% First version, with a single argument, i.e. the
% syntax is \triplet{ c d e }
triplet = #(define-music-function (music) (ly:music?)
#{ \tuplet 3/2 $music #})
\score
It came from:
%% http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=328
Here is part of it:
% First version, with a single argument, i.e. the
% syntax is \triplet{ c d e }
triplet = #(define-music-function (music) (ly:music?)
#{ \tuplet 3/2 $music #})
\score{
\relative c'{
c4 \triplet {c d e}
}
}
Thi
Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 6:17 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 27/02/2022 à 10:29, Pierre-Yves Saumont a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have always used the following syntax to write triplets:
> >
> > \tuplet 3/2 {a8 b c)
> >
> > But when I impo
Le 27/02/2022 à 10:29, Pierre-Yves Saumont a écrit :
Hi,
I have always used the following syntax to write triplets:
\tuplet 3/2 {a8 b c)
But when I import MusicXML files, tuplets are most often rendered as:
\once \omit TupletBracket
\times 2/3 { a8 b8 c8}
}
The most surprising is
Hi,
I have always used the following syntax to write triplets:
\tuplet 3/2 {a8 b c)
But when I import MusicXML files, tuplets are most often rendered as:
\once \omit TupletBracket
\times 2/3 { a8 b8 c8}
}
The most surprising is that the tuple bracket isn't omitted, and removing
&
On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 14:35 +0200, Michael Gerdau wrote:
> > I did indeed examine your code, but that part certainly wasn't
> > clear.
> > As I understand it what you wrote is no different from:
> >
> > \repeat percent 4 { \enterStrictTime \first \leaveStrictTime }
> AFAIUI it is
> \repeat percen
>> When you request strict ruler like time to space relationship then
>> how do you expect Lilypond to know when repeated bars are allowed to
>> use less space and when not so unless you explicitly say so?
>
> This makes sense, just not how I originally understood the repeated
> bars to behave. I
On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 21:16 +0100, Timothy Lanfear wrote:
> On 29/08/2019 20:57, Stefano Antonelli wrote:
> > I feel that it should be possible to scale "something" in lilypond
> > to
> > do the same thing, but I haven't figured that out yet.
> >
> Increasing the paper width will achieve what you
>>> Ideas on how to fix these issues are greatly appreciated.
>> Your pattern does not fit 4 times in a line. That's creating some of
>> your problems. To circumvent that you could switch between spacing
>> settings inside the notes as in the attached example.
>
> Thank you very much. Could you
On 29/08/2019 20:57, Stefano Antonelli wrote:
I understand that the pattern does not fit 4 times on a line. How to
do so is one of my questions. Increasing the length of the line
doesn't appear to have any effect. Though theoretically with a large
enough paper size it should fit. Followed by
On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 12:06 +0200, Michael Gerdau wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> >
> > Ideas on how to fix these issues are greatly appreciated.
> Your pattern does not fit 4 times in a line. That's creating some of
> your problems. To circumvent that you could switch between spacing
> settings inside
Hi Stefano,
> Ideas on how to fix these issues are greatly appreciated.
Your pattern does not fit 4 times in a line. That's creating some of
your problems. To circumvent that you could switch between spacing
settings inside the notes as in the attached example.
For simplicity I've merged all file
Dear List,
I've been fighting a problem with horizontal spacing for some time now.
I'm new to lilypond, but I've done my best to read the documentation
and I didn't see an obvious answer.
The first issue to tackle was getting 4 bars to each line, but I found
the bars-per-line-engraver which seem
Dear List,
I've been fighting a problem with horizontal spacing for some time now.
I'm new to lilypond, but I've done my best to read the documentation
and I didn't see an obvious answer.
The first issue to tackle was getting 4 bars to each line, but I found
the bars-per-line-engraver which seem
2017-01-15 0:21 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
> With my lily-2.14.2 I can do in terminal:
>
> ~$ lilypond-2-14-2 -e '(scm-style-repl)'
> GNU LilyPond 2.14.2
> guile> UP
> 1
> guile> DOWN
> -1
> guile> ly:tuplet-bracket::calc-direction
> #
> guile>
>
> All there and available...
>
> Cheers,
> Harm
B
Hi,
some relevant changes between 2.14 and 2.19 are these:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/changes/index.html
> error: syntax error, unexpected '=', expecting SCM_FUNCTION or SCM_IDENTIFIER
> or SCM_TOKEN
> \override TupletBracket.stencil
> = #ly:sl
> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:42, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>
> On 14.01.2017 23:34, Hans Aikema wrote:
>>> Can you try replacing
>>> UP in that line by 1
>>> and DOWN in that line by -1
>>> apparently the version of Lilypond in use does not yet have these constants
>>> defined (values taken from
>>> in
2017-01-14 23:41 GMT+01:00 J Martin Rushton :
>
>
> On 14/01/17 22:34, Hans Aikema wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton
wrote:
>
Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but th
On 14.01.2017 23:34, Hans Aikema wrote:
Can you try replacing
UP in that line by 1
and DOWN in that line by -1
apparently the version of Lilypond in use does not yet have these constants
defined (values taken from
internalsreference:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/internals/tupletbr
On 14/01/17 22:34, Hans Aikema wrote:
>
>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but there's
>>> an issue with one variable:
>>> -
> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:32, Hans Aikema wrote:
>
>
>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>> Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but there's
>> an issue with one variable:
>> ---%<--
>> Processing `.../fi
> On 14 Jan 2017, at 23:14, J Martin Rushton
> wrote:
>
>
>>
> Progress. That seems to have sorted out the syntax errors but there's
> an issue with one variable:
> ---%<--
> Processing `.../file.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...
> Preprocessing gra
On 14/01/17 22:07, Hans Aikema wrote:
>
>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:49, Richard Shann wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to
>>> waste a
On 14/01/17 21:49, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote:
>>
>> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote:
>>
>
>> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to
>> waste a lot of time, so I've gone back to using square type brackets,
> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:49, Richard Shann wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote:
>>
>> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote:
>>
>
>> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to
>> waste a lot of time, so I've gone back to using square t
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 21:48 +, J Martin Rushton wrote:
>
> On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote:
>
> I suspect the outer processing or else the low version are going to
> waste a lot of time, so I've gone back to using square type brackets,
> the slur type were not clear.
yes, the first -
On 14/01/17 21:41, Hans Aikema wrote:
>
>> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:33, J Martin Rushton
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote:
>>>
>>>
Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton
het volgende geschreven:
I'm guessing things aren't that sim
On 14/01/17 21:29, Richard Shann wrote:
>
> Here's a complete working example:
> 8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><
>
> %% LilyPond file generated by Denemo version 2.0.17
>
> %%http://www.gnu.org/software/denemo/
>
> \version "2.18.0"
>
>
>
> On 14 Jan 2017, at 22:33, J Martin Rushton
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton
>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the
>>> same inp
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 20:51 +, J Martin Rushton wrote:
>
> On 14/01/17 19:57, Richard Shann wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to
> &g
On 14/01/17 21:27, Hans Aikema wrote:
>
>
>> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton
>> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the
>> same input file? I don't have access to the code, this is embedded
>> within a larger
On 14/01/17 21:14, Noeck wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Am 14.01.2017 um 21:51 schrieb J Martin Rushton:
>> I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the
>> same input file?
>
> Of course. You can put one after the other without problems and you can
> nest them using #{ …ly…
> Op 14 jan. 2017 om 21:51 heeft J Martin Rushton
> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
>
> I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the
> same input file? I don't have access to the code, this is embedded
> within a larger application. At present all I have is a \relati
Hi Martin,
Am 14.01.2017 um 21:51 schrieb J Martin Rushton:
> I'm guessing things aren't that simple, can I mix scheme and LP in the
> same input file?
Of course. You can put one after the other without problems and you can
nest them using #{ …ly… #} and #( …scheme… ).
> I don't have access to
On 14/01/17 20:46, Noeck wrote:
> tupletBracketToSlur = {
> % Use slur-stencil
> \override TupletBracket.stencil = #ly:slur::print
> %% Use 'thickness from Slur
> \override TupletBracket.thickness = #1.2
> %% 'control-points need to be set
> \override TupletBracket.control-points =
>
On 14/01/17 19:57, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to
>> the original. Triplets are indicated with a curved bracket rather than
>
Hi Martin,
please note that you have to replace the double backslashes by a single
one and mind the line breaks in the e-mail.
Here is a version that works for me (2.19.50).
Best,
Joram
tupletBracketToSlur = {
% Use slur-stencil
\override TupletBracket.stencil = #ly:slur::print
%% Use 't
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 18:14 +, J Martin Rushton wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to
> the original. Triplets are indicated with a curved bracket rather than
> the square one Lily uses by default. I've co
Hi,
I'm trying to set a melody from a 19thC source as closely as possible to
the original. Triplets are indicated with a curved bracket rather than
the square one Lily uses by default. I've come up with a mechanism:
\relative c'' {
\tupletUp
\override TupletBracket.brac
;s4' instead of '\once \omit Rest r16*3/2'.
Thank you for these thoughts/snippet!
Cheers
Jan-Peter
Am 23.03.2016 um 01:31 schrieb Thomas Morley:
2016-03-22 15:10 GMT+01:00 Jan-Peter Voigt :
Hi all,
I have a problem spacing grace notes under a series of triplets. In the
example,
.03.2016 um 19:35 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
Hi Jan-Peter,
On 22.03.2016 15:10, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem spacing grace notes under a series of triplets. In
the example, the grace notes produce a big gap between the tuplets or
collide with the accidentals.
It’s an ann
2016-03-22 15:10 GMT+01:00 Jan-Peter Voigt :
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem spacing grace notes under a series of triplets. In the
> example, the grace notes produce a big gap between the tuplets or collide
> with the accidentals.
>
> As this situation is evident a few times
Hi Jan-Peter,
On 22.03.2016 15:10, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem spacing grace notes under a series of triplets. In
the example, the grace notes produce a big gap between the tuplets or
collide with the accidentals.
It’s an annoying bug that this isn’t handled nicely, and
Hi all,
I have a problem spacing grace notes under a series of triplets. In the
example, the grace notes produce a big gap between the tuplets or
collide with the accidentals.
As this situation is evident a few times, I will probably use
extra-offset and place either the grace notes or the
Nick McManus writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having some trouble achieving subdivided beams in this particular
> example:
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> \relative c''{
> \set subdivideBeams = ##t
> \set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
> \tuplet 9/4 {a16 bes a bes c bes c d c}
> }
>
> I would like
es+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
> Nick McManus
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:53 PM
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Subdivide beams in triplets
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having some trouble achieving subdivided beams in this particular
>
Subject: Subdivide beams in triplets
Hi all,
I'm having some trouble achieving subdivided beams in this particular
example:
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c''{
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
\set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
\tuplet 9/4 {a16 bes a bes c bes c d c} }
Hi all,
I'm having some trouble achieving subdivided beams in this particular
example:
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c''{
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
\set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 8)
\tuplet 9/4 {a16 bes a bes c bes c d c}
}
I would like to achieve a set of 9 semiquavers (16th notes)
On 16.09.2015 12:43, Erich Neuwirth wrote:
%% I need a tie between the second note of the first triplet and the first note
of the second triplet,
%% and I need the notehead of the d (upper note at first position) to be a half
note.
%% superimposing the half note and the triplet note gives the f
Am 16.09.2015 um 12:43 schrieb Erich Neuwirth:
%% I need a tie between the second note of the first triplet and the first note
of the second triplet,
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
or (if outside of the polyphonic construction)
\set Staff.tieWaitForNote ##t
should help.
%% and I need the note
;> In the score I am using as stating point,
>> the g’s at the first position of the triplets and the g’s of \voiceFour
>> have a common notepad and the notes of the lowest voice
>> are slightly shifted to the right.
>> Can this be accomplished also?
>>
> Yes. Pu
{ g8 c \change Staff = "upper" g' } \change Staff =
> "lower"
>
Best,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/triplets-across-staves-in-piano-scores-tp181182p181183.html
S
%% How can I put the last note of each triplet on the lower stave
%% on the upper stave of the piano staff?
\header{
title = "Triplets across staves"
}
upper = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key c \major
\time 2/4
c'2
}
lower = \relative c' {
\clef bas
2015-02-05 23:59 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
>
> Am 05.02.2015 um 23:44 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>
>> 2015-02-05 23:29 GMT+01:00 mirko :
>>>
>>> I have to write a score which is entirely in triplets. is there a way to
>>> avoid typing all the \times but just s
Am 05.02.2015 um 23:44 schrieb Thomas Morley:
2015-02-05 23:29 GMT+01:00 mirko :
I have to write a score which is entirely in triplets. is there a way to
avoid typing all the \times but just set a global rule so the eight note can
be automatically considered as part of a triplet?
Look for
2015-02-05 23:29 GMT+01:00 mirko :
> I have to write a score which is entirely in triplets. is there a way to
> avoid typing all the \times but just set a global rule so the eight note can
> be automatically considered as part of a triplet?
Look for
scaleDurations
and/or
tupletSpanne
I have to write a score which is entirely in triplets. is there a way to
avoid typing all the \times but just set a global rule so the eight note can
be automatically considered as part of a triplet?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: spacing of triplets
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek
>>
>> When I extract the code for these measures, extracted.ly, the
>> triplets are more evenly spaced, extracted.pdf.
>>
>>
>>
>> Where should I look for a r
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek
>
>
> >>
> >> When I extract the code for these measures, extracted.ly, the
> >> triplets are more evenly spaced, extracted.pdf.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Where should I loo
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: Alicuota618; LilyPond User Group
Subject: Re: spacing of triplets
There must be some other thing injected in a prior spot of your ly code for the
entire movement that is causing that peculiar spacing to show up. I would start
backtracking from the problem area and add
l Message-
> From: Alicuota618 [mailto:alicuota...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 9:18 AM
> To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: spacing of triplets
>
> Hello,
>
> as musician, I find more readable the ly-version. Cant say more
Frank,
Agreed, yet that is not how it appears when the entire movement is printed.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alicuota618 [mailto:alicuota...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 9:18 AM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: spacing of triplets
Hello
Hello,
as musician, I find more readable the ly-version. Cant say more
Franck
2014-10-13 10:30 GMT-05:00, Mark Stephen Mrotek :
> Hello,
>
>
>
> The attached file, InPlace.pdf, is a scan of three measures of a thirty
> seven measure movement. Notice the triplets in the low
Hello,
The attached file, InPlace.pdf, is a scan of three measures of a thirty
seven measure movement. Notice the triplets in the lower staff. They are not
evenly spaced.
When I extract the code for these measures, extracted.ly, the triplets are
more evenly spaced, extracted.pdf.
Where
Richard Shann writes:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 19:05 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Richard Shann writes:
>>
>> > Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at
>> > getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious
>> > challenge.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> > It would be n
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 19:05 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
>
> > Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at
> > getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious
> > challenge.
>
> Yes.
>
> > It would be nice to have a graphical way of sele
Richard Shann writes:
> Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at
> getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious
> challenge.
Yes.
> It would be nice to have a graphical way of selecting what you want
> visually and letting the computer do the hard work..
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 16:52 +, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Richard Shann"
> To: "lilypond-user"
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 4:30 PM
> Subject: Different beaming for triplets
>
>
> > I've been asked
Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at getting
my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious challenge. It
would be nice to have a graphical way of selecting what you want
visually and letting the computer do the hard work...
Your new 2.19 syntax certainly looks an
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 8:30 AM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: Different beaming for triplets
I've been asked a beaming rule question:
Is it possible to specify a different beaming rule if a beat is divided into
a triplet? In this example
\version "2.16.0"
\score
Richard Shann writes:
> I've been asked a beaming rule question:
>
> Is it possible to specify a different beaming rule if a beat is divided
> into a triplet? In this example
>
>
> \version "2.16.0"
> \score {
> {\time 3/8
> d''4 \times 2/3 { bes''16 a'' bes'' }
> fis''
I've been asked a beaming rule question:
Is it possible to specify a different beaming rule if a beat is divided
into a triplet? In this example
\version "2.16.0"
\score {
{\time 3/8
d''4 \times 2/3 { bes''16 a'' bes'' }
fis''8 g''8 r
ees'' \times 2/3 { d''16 c'' bes
2013/6/21 Urs Liska :
> Am 21.06.2013 22:44, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> 2013/6/20 Mike Solomon :
>>>
>>> On 19 juin 2013, at 16:24, Tim McNamara wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Occasionally LilyPond will render triplets in
Am 21.06.2013 22:44, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi folks,
2013/6/20 Mike Solomon :
On 19 juin 2013, at 16:24, Tim McNamara wrote:
Occasionally LilyPond will render triplets in an ungraceful manner: [...]
This is not a problem in 2.17.21 with the following input : [...]
I've seen the o
Hi folks,
2013/6/20 Mike Solomon :
> On 19 juin 2013, at 16:24, Tim McNamara wrote:
>> Occasionally LilyPond will render triplets in an ungraceful manner: [...]
>
> This is not a problem in 2.17.21 with the following input : [...]
I've seen the output like Tim posted many t
On 19 juin 2013, at 16:24, Tim McNamara wrote:
> Occasionally LilyPond will render triplets in an ungraceful manner:
>
>
>
>
> And
>
>
>
> All the quarter note triplets in the piece which are not under a volta
> bracket are rendered with nice, attractive
Hilary Snaden writes:
> On 27/04/13 14:41, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Hilary Snaden writes:
>> \tuplet has a nicer way to deal with tupletSpannerDuration, by the way.
>>
>> So you can continue using it if you want to, but in a few years,
>> newcomers might no longer recognize what you are doing eve
On 27/04/13 14:41, David Kastrup wrote:
Hilary Snaden writes:
\tuplet has a nicer way to deal with tupletSpannerDuration, by the way.
So you can continue using it if you want to, but in a few years,
newcomers might no longer recognize what you are doing even though
LilyPond most likely will.
>
Hilary Snaden writes:
> After using LilyPond for seven years, I've got used to the \times x/y
> notation. How long will it remain available alongside \tuplet y/x?
There are no plans to remove it. However, all of the documentation in
2.18 has been converted to use \tuplet, and convert-ly will do
On 27/04/13 05:02, David Kastrup wrote:
Sarah k Alawami writes:
Ok. I understand how triplets work. I've played them often enough lol!
but in lily pond according to the manual it says it's written in a
fraction. That's the part I don't get. I'm very horrible at
enough information here, because 'triplets' covers a lot of
> cases. But usually it is three notes in the time of two, so the fraction to
> use with \times is 2/3. If you use later versions of lilypond such as 2.17,
> they introduced a better notation which is \tuplet where you can
Sarah k Alawami writes:
> Ok. I understand how triplets work. I've played them often enough lol!
> but in lily pond according to the manual it says it's written in a
> fraction. That's the part I don't get. I'm very horrible at math so is
> there a way
On Apr 26, 2013, at 6:56 PM, Sarah k Alawami wrote:
> Ok. I understand how triplets work. I've played them often enough lol! but in
> lily pond according to the manual it says it's written in a fraction. That's
> the part I don't get. I'm very horrible at math
Ok. I understand how triplets work. I've played them often enough lol! but in
lily pond according to the manual it says it's written in a fraction. That's
the part I don't get. I'm very horrible at math so is there a way to comprehend
these triplets. I think they are e
On 26 December 2012 10:07, Helge Kruse wrote:
> Lilypond promises to generate nicely scores.
> (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/essay/engraving-details#optical-spacing)
>
> This works in most cases. But I have currently a score that shows ugly
> triplets. It should
Lilypond promises to generate nicely scores.
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/essay/engraving-details#optical-spacing)
This works in most cases. But I have currently a score that shows ugly
triplets. It should spread the note heads evenly aligned in the X-axis.
The excerpt below
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
