Hello.
is it possible to add roman numerals to context chord grid ? Thanks in
advance. Jean-Pierre
Hello.
is it possible to add roman numerals to context chord grid ? Thanks in
advance. Jean-Pierre
From: lilypond-user
on behalf of Matthew Pierce
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 12:28 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: String roman numerals in 2.22.2
New LilyPond user here, hello everyone. Fantastic tool.
Anyone got a method for roman numeral string
ad [g] on the staff, and
the relevant fingerings [4 above 1] above the staff, but no roman numeral [II]
underneath.
The same code did, however, give me my roman numerals under single notes. What
am I missing?
Thanks
Matt
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Daniel Contreras wrote:
> Does anyone know the best way to input harmony labels such as II V I etc? Any
> help or suggestions would be much appreciated.
Enter them as lyrics? That seemed to be the most natural solution for my
similar question of how to use arbitrary markup f
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know the best way to input harmony labels such as II V I etc? Any
help or suggestions would be much appreciated.
Daniel Contreras
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/li
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:25:07 -0500
David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hello,
Thank you so much for your answer to my question re: string
letters instead of numbers. I have seen ringed letters in violin
music as well as in the guitar music of Villa Lobos. I don't think
HVL made it up. Using it I have found
David Nalesnik writes:
> Hi Philip,
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Philip Eliot
> wrote:
>
>> I would agree, hence the question. I thought there might be a built in
>> option to do that. Having searched through the documentation, I'm fairly
>> certain there is no built in way to do it. A
Hi Philip,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Philip Eliot
wrote:
> I would agree, hence the question. I thought there might be a built in
> option to do that. Having searched through the documentation, I'm fairly
> certain there is no built in way to do it. At one point in the
> documentation, i
rride StringNumber.stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
>
> \clef "treble_8"
> c4\5 e\4 g2\3
> 1
> }
>
>
Shouldn't StringNumber be able to do this already? It's very common to
indicate strings on violin, viola, etc. with Roman numerals.
--David
__
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, David Raleigh Arnold
wrote:
>
>
> How do I indicate strings by letter-pitch instead of
> numbers, the way Villa Lobos did? Regards, Rale
>
>
You could do something like the following:
\version "2.19.8"
#(define strings "EBGDAE")
#(define (string-numbe
2014-06-30 22:25 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik :
> Hello,
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:32 PM, philip wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
>> default numbering format for string numbers
>> (default is circled arabic num
Roman numerals are very much the convention for string indications for the
violin family.
On 07:13, Tue 01 Jul 2014, Nick Payne wrote:
> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 07:13:47 +1000
> From: Nick Payne
> Subject: Re: string numbers (fingering instructions) as roman numerals?
> To: lilypond-
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:32:44 + (UTC)
philip wrote:
> Hi,
> I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
> default numbering format for string numbers
> (default is circled arabic numbers) and use roman
> numerals instead.
> An example would be something li
On 01/07/14 05:32, philip wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
default numbering format for string numbers
(default is circled arabic numbers) and use roman
numerals instead.
An example would be something like this:
{ e''\2 } which is an e played on the sec
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:32 PM, philip wrote:
> Hi,
> I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
> default numbering format for string numbers
> (default is circled arabic numbers) and use roman
> numerals instead.
>
>
Try this:
\version "2.19.8&
Hi Philip
2014-06-30 21:32 GMT+02:00 philip :
> I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
> default numbering format for string numbers
> (default is circled arabic numbers) and use roman
> numerals instead.
> An example would be something like this:
> { e'&#x
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
default numbering format for string numbers
(default is circled arabic numbers) and use roman
numerals instead.
An example would be something like this:
{ e''\2 } which is an e played on the second
string. The default shows a
ul to me would be a minimal example of it working.
Thanks,
Tim
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Alex Loomis wrote:
> There is a way to make roman numerals here.
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=710
> Click on the image, save the wall of text you see as roman.ly, and add
>
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Tim Ringenbach
wrote:
> [...]
> But, I still wasn't able to get the pedal in the second ending to start out
> open. It always gave me a warning that the \sustainOff didn't have a
> matching \sustainOn for the last measure. It worked in the first ending
> though, wh
There is a way to make roman numerals here.
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=710
Click on the image, save the wall of text you see as roman.ly, and add the
line \include roman.ly after the version line.
As for the rest, I would have to see your code to see why it was acting
strange.
On Mon
t have a
matching \sustainOn for the last measure. It worked in the first ending
though, which I thought was a little odd since they were both in the
\alternative tag.
Eventually I gave up on that and let the pedal start on the first node of the
last measure, and end on the first rest.
Finally, I go
any ides?
Blessing in+,
Ming.
>
> From: David Nalesnik
>To: MING TSANG
>Cc: lilypond-user
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 6:12:52 PM
>Subject: Re: roman numerals
>
>Hi Ming,
>
>On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:56 PM, MING TSANG
Well that's just half-dim, but the other one is a good point. There are plenty
of
jazz chords with extensions that would be valuable to notate in roman numerals.
V7 #11 b9 for instance. #5, b13, whatever.
It seems like so much of this could be enabled just by allowing chord mode
to a
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:35 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> I was thinking of chords like a Cm7b9 and the like.
Well, that's an awful chord. I meant Cm7b5 which the example shows..
-David.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://li
Hi Curt,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Curt wrote:
> I'm just curious what other jazz-lead-sheet use cases that the current
> snippet might not be sufficient for? That might help with making a good
> feature request. :-) I've long thought that using roman numerals would
Hi Ming,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:56 PM, MING TSANG wrote:
> I try to download rN.ly
> from
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg69861/rN.ly
>
> and I got error 404.
>
I'm not sure why--I click on the link I gave in the other thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.or
I'm just curious what other jazz-lead-sheet use cases that the current
snippet might not be sufficient for? That might help with making a good
feature request. :-) I've long thought that using roman numerals would
be a good spruced up "nashville notation" for helping ja
eft hand of a piano
> part, for instance, has 16th note arpeggios but only one harmony, one needs
> to input \markup \rN {""} a huge number of times for each measure.
You don't need to go to all this trouble to skip notes to get the
Roman numerals where you'd like them to be.
e needs
to input \markup \rN {""} a huge number of times for each measure.
Anyway, now that we know who wrote it the code, thank you, David. Roman
numerals were the one thing that made me have to go back to Sibelius, and
now I don't have to.
--
View this message in context:
h
\translate #'(-0.7 . 0) {
\teeny \raise #0.4 \sharp 5 }
}
}
But this is hardly optimal.
I'll look into specifying alterations for the elements of the column,
and automating the alignment.
The function as it exists is designed to cover the majority of cases
you might
Kevin Patrick Barry writes:
> Thank you for the updated code; I can put an accidental in front of
> the numeral now just fine, but I can't seem to put one next to any of
> the numerals, or on its own (for altering the third above the bass).
> I tried various combinations of the following and the
er
and the time saved would be very helpful!
I agree about the problems with lyrics and with figured bass.
LilyPond has quite nice figured bass (with options for stroked figures
and everything like that) so it would be nice if one were able to
place figured bass columns next to roman num
Hi Kevin,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Kevin Patrick Barry wrote:
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:04:48 +0100
>> From: David Kastrup
>> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: roman numerals
>> Message-ID: <87sj83jmpr@fencepo
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:04:48 +0100
> From: David Kastrup
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: roman numerals
> Message-ID: <87sj83jmpr@fencepost.gnu.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Michael Rivers writes:
>
>> Sweet! Than
Michael Rivers writes:
> Sweet! Thank you so much for that code, and thank you to whoever wrote it.
> Open source is amazing.
"Dunno who I stole this from" does not meet the licensing criteria for
either Open Source or Free Software.
--
David Kastrup
_
Yes, this is what I ended up using. Works pretty well, a couple of images attached. It'd be nice if lilypond supported this natively someday. Most of what I need could be accomplished just by by chord mode allowing roman numerals as well as note names. Doesn't need to support tra
Sweet! Thank you so much for that code, and thank you to whoever wrote it.
Open source is amazing.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/roman-numerals-tp136585p136635.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
> The snippet posted in the original post doesn't work for me. I don't think
> \rN is a real command. I can't get 2.16.1 to recognize it.
>
> I have tried to add Roman numerals to figured bass in Lilypond with \markup
> commands, but it looks very wrong.
>
>
Dun
x27;t think
\rN is a real command. I can't get 2.16.1 to recognize it.
I have tried to add Roman numerals to figured bass in Lilypond with \markup
commands, but it looks very wrong.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/roman-numerals-tp136585p136632.html
S
of those symbols
> completely by themselves, with no staff or note above/below.
it's not so easy to see what you mean exactly - could you provide some
initial code or a scanned picture of what should result?!
thanks
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.na
Hi, what is the easiest way to notate a
V/V (probably looks just like that)
viidim7/ii (a vii followed by a dim circle superscript and a 7
superscript, then a slash then a ii)
iim7b5/vi? (either m7b5 superscript, or a half-dim circle superscript,
then a slash then vi)
It
Nils writes:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:03:37 -0500
> Bryn Hughes wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a way to have lilypond render bass figures that are any smaller? I
>> have been working with the \set fontSize = # command, but it doesn't seem
>> to do anything to the figures ( I can change the s
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:03:37 -0500
Bryn Hughes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to have lilypond render bass figures that are any smaller? I
> have been working with the \set fontSize = # command, but it doesn't seem
> to do anything to the figures ( I can change the size of noteheads, etc.
>
Hi Bryn,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Bryn Hughes wrote:
> I will, David. Thank you!
>
> This may be an ignorant question, but it is possible to reference your .ly
> file in another .ly file, so that it's easier to read the code I'm working
> on?
>
Sure, you can save the function in a separ
I will, David. Thank you!
This may be an ignorant question, but it is possible to reference your .ly
file in another .ly file, so that it's easier to read the code I'm working
on?
Thanks!
Bryn
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:42 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi Bryn,
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:32 PM
Hi Bryn,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Bryn Hughes wrote:
> This is wonderful! Thank you so much!
Glad you like it!
I should have an improved version fairly soon, and I'll be happy to post
that when it's ready. (Please let me know if you run into any problems, or
if you have any suggestio
Aha! Thank you so much!
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Nils wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:03:37 -0500
> Bryn Hughes wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there a way to have lilypond render bass figures that are any
> smaller? I
> > have been working with the \set fontSize = # command, but it does
es in
> this way. Ideally, the Roman numerals would include superscript figures,
> though to have the figures separate and simply smaller than the Roman
> numerals would work well too.
>
Attached is the file I use for my theory classes. It works best if you add
the analysis to a L
ave a template or resources for including
a Roman numeral/figured bass analysis underneath a staff (preferably a
piano staff)? I teach music theory and we routinely analyze chorales in
this way. Ideally, the Roman numerals would include superscript figures,
though to have the figures separate and s
fancy-format becomes the name for the ice-9 format function.
format becomes the name for ergonomic-simple-format.
So you can see that format is redefined to be simple-format.
Thanks Carl.
All is clearer.
So, by default, you should use "format" and reserve "fancy-format" for
specific uses (
On 3/17/11 5:04 PM, "Gilles THIBAULT" wrote:
> Just a comment :
> If you use "format" instead of "fancy-format" it works too.
> fancy-format doen't seem to be part of guile, so only a function added by
> Lilypond. I found it in output-svg.scm defined as follow :
> (define fancy-format format)
> So
On 3/17/11 5:04 PM, "Gilles THIBAULT" wrote:
> fancy-format doen't seem to be part of guile, so only a function added by
> Lilypond. I found it in output-svg.scm defined as follow :
> (define fancy-format format)
> So it is exactly the same !
> What the advantage to use fancy-format vs format ?
Right -- markFormatter needs to be a procedure, so you define it as a
lambda procedure:
\set Score.markFormatter = #(lambda (mark) (fancy-format #f "~@r." mark))
Haven't tested, but this is the general idea.
This lambda procedure needs 2 arguments.
With :
\set Score.markFormatter = #(lambda (m
On 3/17/11 9:37 AM, "Adam Good" wrote:
> Another tree to bark up and on a similar note, how to set roman
> numerals in Score.markFormatter as rehearsal marks via \mark \default
> ...
>
> \version "2.12.3"
>
> \relative c' {
> \set
Another tree to bark up and on a similar note, how to set roman
numerals in Score.markFormatter as rehearsal marks via \mark \default
...
\version "2.12.3"
\relative c' {
\set Score.markFormatter = #(fancy-format #f "~@r." 1)
\mark \default
a b c d
\mark \d
Completely awesome. Thank you guys so much for your help. Long live
Lilyponders!!
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk
wrote:
> On Thu 17 Mar 2011, 09:13 Adam Good wrote:
>> Carl thank you for the input! Unfortunately I get an error that I
>> don't know how to do anything with. Belo
On Thu 17 Mar 2011, 09:13 Adam Good wrote:
> Carl thank you for the input! Unfortunately I get an error that I
> don't know how to do anything with. Below is my input and output.
>
> If you or anyone can help this would be a nice help to me. Thanks!
> Adam
>
> @@@
>
> \version "2.12.3"
>
> #(de
Carl thank you for the input! Unfortunately I get an error that I
don't know how to do anything with. Below is my input and output.
If you or anyone can help this would be a nice help to me. Thanks!
Adam
@@@
\version "2.12.3"
#(define sequence-number 0)
#(define-markup-command (score-sequence
On 3/16/11 4:16 PM, "Adam Good" wrote:
> Hello,
> Considering that fretboard diagrams can use (number-type .
> roman-lower) how can I get scheme to print Roman numerals in place of
> Arabic numbers in the following sequence?
>
> Thanks
A quick search of scm
Hello,
Considering that fretboard diagrams can use (number-type .
roman-lower) how can I get scheme to print Roman numerals in place of
Arabic numbers in the following sequence?
Thanks
Adam
@@@
\version "2.12.3"
#(define sequence-number 0)
#(define-markup-command (score-seque
Michael Watts escreveu:
If you're "sharing it with the community", send it to the list as well!
Now it is shared. Thanks.
Hugo
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
If you're "sharing it with the community", send it to the list as well!
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Federico Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to have chord names shown as rom
ky, as the roman numerals
relate to the key of the moment.
It might be easier to add or define markups as you need them
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=309
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Federico Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to have chord name
Hello,
I would like to have chord names shown as roman numerals.
Ex: in the key of D minor
names roman numerals
Dm i
A7 V7
Gm7 iv7
I have a simple 4 bar example using the named chords posted online here:
http://casagrau.org/~donfede/lily
V V V4
>
> This kind of figured bass, appearing below the staff, is distinct from the so
> called "chord notation" such as
>
> Fdim F7 Cmin
>
> etc. Is there a way in lilypond to notate these Roman
> numerals in the figured bass?
I adde
staff, is distinct from the so
called "chord notation" such as
Fdim F7 Cmin
etc. Is there a way in lilypond to notate these Roman
numerals in the figured bass?
There is no direct support for it today. As a workaround, you could
typeset them using text scripts (I used to do that also for the
rom the so
called "chord notation" such as
FdimF7 Cmin
etc. Is there a way in lilypond to notate these Roman
numerals in the figured bass?
2. I use the kpathsea method of organizing TeX fonts. Specifically, beside the
system texmf tree in /usr/share I use a standard-structure tex
68 matches
Mail list logo
